Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrongly convicted Horizon victims in Scotland to be exonerated NEWS.STV.TV Victims who faced wrongful convictions are to be exonerated the day after Royal Assent is granted.  
    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bicester1 vs Nat West **WON**


Bicester1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well joined the forum yesterday am. SAR off to Nat West for Bank Account and CC yesterday pm.

 

Game on!

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well won against MBNA so now for the Nat West.

 

Credit card and bank account.

 

Got all my statements from my SAR and calculate Baqnk Charges of £1878 with interest of £1211 at their unauthorised OD rate of 29.5%.

 

On the Credit Card £432 in charges plus £259 in interest at 18%.

 

So prelim letters sent mid Decenber no sensible reply just the usual drivel so LBA went off 7 days ago [yes I know but I did have a good Christmas ] Holding letter from CC this am saying we will write again in two weeks!

 

I don't think so!

 

Will spend this weekend drafting POC!

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Letter from Mr Mike Bailey re: Credit Card offering to refund the difference between £12 and their charges but no interest!

 

Anyone else had this experience?

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not with NW as I don't have a credit card with them, however I did have the same experience with my claim against Capital One. This seems to be pretty normal for credit card firms to offer the difference between the charges applied to your account and £12 maximum charged governed by the OFT ruling.

You should turn down this offer as you are entitled to the full ammount you are claiming. My Cap One claim made this offer to me twice and both times I turned it down, they have now offered the full ammount I am claiming and I just await the cheque through my door, I can't see it being any different in your claim.

  • Haha 1

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi deller1. Thanks that's what I felt and have written back saying so! One interesting point tho' in that in the letter they talk about their charge as "a fixed penalty notice" no mention of a fee for service! I have therefore written back and thanked them for at least admitting that they are applying penalty charges and not liquidated damages!

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CAGers

 

Reading the forum over the last 24 hrs, I think it's now fairly clear that NW are offering to settle claims sooner. In my case letter by return after my LBA for my £1800 in charges but no offer of any interest. Others seem to be getting an offer of full refund of charges, but no interest, after prelim

 

I had claimed their unauthorised rate of 29% but in view of their offer I have counter offered for charges and 8% and am now waiting for a response.

 

It does seem to me therefore, that they have abandoned their previous strategy of prevarication and if they assess the claim as well prepared, a good one and the claimant as determined, they are now offering charges back, more or less by return. The sticking point is interest. This has some important implications for new claims.

 

You cannot claim s69 interest till you get to issue a county court claim. Therefore, if you claim only for your charges in your prelim, expecting a sod off letter, but NW offer to settle in response, you are stuck, as I understand that you have to accept their offer. You cannot then go back and ask for charges plus interest, once they have offered to meet your demand for the repayment of the charges alone.

 

IMHO therefore it seems to me that the tactic must be to write your prelim asking for charges plus contractual and negociate from there!!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hate this post but mainly because I was going to say it myself. Personally, the issue is one that is one of the most difficult ones. A lot of people still ask about interest. I think most people should stick to the KISS principal- Keep It Simple Stupid. That means you get your charges back as a bare minimum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nattie

 

Yup! Always believed in KISS [no tongues tho'] but seriously this is quite clever by Nat West.

 

To reiterate; if peeps send in a prelim asking for charges, intending to ask for s69 later, as I did with my MBNA claim, they run the risk of being unable to claim any interest at all once Nat West reply, [as MBNA did in my case] by return, offering their charges back as they now seem to be doing. This means claiming for contractual from scratch.

 

This is quite a high risk strategy and will be divisive as individual attitudes to interest will vary. Someone did post saying that they thought some people were "optimistic" on their interest charges. Furthermore in general terms I do get a feeling, reading thro' this and other forums and I wouldn't put it anymore strongly than that, that the courts don't like contractual interest. I know that many will regard this as unfair after all that's what they charge us, but that is I think, the reality of the current situation. Furthermore the courts like negotiation and compromise, hanging out for contractual when an offer of a full refund of charges has been made rapidly, might be seen as unreasonable and could result in claimants loosing the lot!

 

The interesting question [as we all know] is of course, what the real cost to the bank is in bouncing cheques etc. It might be argued that the difference between contractual and s69 represents very roughly what it costs the bank to run your account.

 

People will need to take a hard headed look at their case and decide if the difference in £ is worth the agro of court and additional time expended. I think that will have to be decided on an individual case by case basis, but people will need to remember, as one of the mods said, this is not a get rich quick scheme! I think it will be more important than ever to make a statement allowing the court the option of s69 in the alternative to contractual in your POC, otherwise claimants will run the risk of defendants attempting to portray them to the judge as opportunistic carpet baggers. There is at least one post here where the judge took just that approach to a claimant.

 

Interesting times!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

In the post this morning from Nat West cc "decided to reduce your credit limit blah blah etc."

 

Puerile retaliation for the fact that I am claiming charges or what!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think as well, that because of such claims, litigation costs are rising and that maybe claiming a higher rate of interest than 8% could be arguable in casught since interest rates on overdrafts have varied and narrowing it down to the precise pounds and pence would take a mathematical genius. 8% on the other hand does not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some fair points raised here, always like a bit of debate.

 

My NW claim was filed on the 25th Jan with 29.5 contractual. But i also left some breathing space arguing 16.99 and 8 as alternatives..

 

I have recieved an offer today, some £600 short of my claim, which to be honest i am happy about. I can now pursue the ineterst, whichever it may be, in court.

 

However, if they had offered me the full amount i would have stopped the proceedings first thing Monday morning, on the simple basis that going to court just to squeeze the interest out of them is wrong and precarious..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nattie

 

Yes I agree. Reasonableness is however vital! [50% lol] If people really do want interest they are going to have to go after it from prelim stage I note that the template prelim letter in the library does not mention interest at all. Does this need modifying? Any mods out there? What do you think Nattie?

 

I guess NW have finally decided thy have no defence to people reclaiming their charges and so now it becomes a cynical damage limitation exercise in trying to limit the total cost by trying to avoid interest! Given that most solicitors will be charging £200+ per hour I am sure NW will calculate settling is probably cheaper, in most cases, than litigating! I am sure many claimants on this site will settle for the return of their charges without interest. How many will have the stomach for a long drawn out fight and relish the thought of going to court?

 

My guess is they will settle those claims which are just for charges, if for only a few hundred pounds, continue to defend up to the wire claims which include contractual and who knows what for charges plus s69. We should know in a few days when I get their reply to my counter offer.

 

It will be interesting to see if the other financial institutions follow the Nat West. What's the betting they do? I think this is a very important turning point in the battle, as Churchill said about El Alemain:

 

"This is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end, but it the end of the beginning!"

 

Probably a good time to go short on NW or other bank shares!!

 

Onward to Berlin or should that be Bishopsgate!!!

 

Bicester1

 

 

MBNA WON £623

:-)

GM Card Won £580 :-)

Barclaycard LBA :-x

Nat West Bank offer received negotiating :p

Nat West CC offer received negotiating :p

Lloyds PPI prelim:wink:

 

 

Any advice is given informally. I am not a lawyer. Consult a trained professional if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Josamolly,

 

Interesting. Does the £600 short mean short of charges, or charges + 29.5% interest?

 

If the offer equals charges plus s69 you need to get some advice. Whilst I understand that payments into court don't happen in the small claims court if they have made a "reasonable offer" the case might get interesting.

 

I wonder if their tactic will be to move strike out on the grounds of claimants unreasonableness in rejecting a "fair" offer.

 

This will get very interesting. Do keep us informed!

 

Bicester1

 

 

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bicester1,

Very stirring statement. At least all us CAGGERS can prepare for their new tactics. :p .Thanks to the open debates on this wonderful site. Forewarned is forearmed.So

on into battle.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Josamolly

 

Sorry that's me being thick! It's interesting that they have not offered you the full amount of your charges. Can you tell us how much you claimed? I got an offer for my full £1800. I wonder If they have a cut off point? Maybe 2 or 3K.

 

I think that as long as you give the court the options in the alternative for interest, between s69 or contractual, in your POC there should be no probs.

 

Do keep us posted.

 

 

Bicester1

 

 

MBNA WON £623

:-)

GM Card Won £580 :-)

Barclaycard LBA :-x

Nat West Bank offer received negotiating :p

Nat West CC offer received negotiating :p

Lloyds PPI prelim:wink:

 

 

Any advice is given informally. I am not a lawyer. Consult a trained professional if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bicester1- I think we are having an impact and I think from the letter which was on another thread you can now see that the fact that people are clued up means that IMHO that the solicitors may well find that arguing interest ONLY is easier than arguing on the charges itself which is a good feeling for those not pursuing it through NO WIN NO FEE vultures. It also means those people who feel a little intimidated by the whole process will feel easier in their ability to claim back charges without needing a PhD in Maths to argue the interest bit before a judge although 8% should be easier to argue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nattie.

 

Agree completely! This is just snowballing. The mainstream media are at last picking it up. Even the Daily Telegraph is encouraging its readers to claim back [ Do DT readers get charged!? ]

 

I guess that's the calculation NW have made. I guess at least 50% of claimants will settle for charges only and no interest. I wonder if there is an upper limit above which they will automatically defend or should I say prevaricate!?

 

Bicester1

 

 

MBNA WON £623

:-)

GM Card Won £580 :-)

Barclaycard LBA :-x

Nat West Bank offer received negotiating :p

Nat West CC offer received negotiating :p

Lloyds PPI prelim:wink:

 

 

Any advice is given informally. I am not a lawyer. Consult a trained professional if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think they would defend on the interest bit alone, but if it is 8% then I see no problem of a win after the usual of test the water, ie defend claim, nervous sweating, defendants AQ and then pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bicester1,

My claim is for over £9k, which includes the court over £2k in court 8% interest. Makes good commercial sense to settle before court interest comes into play.:rolleyes: So if it is a straight forward claim. No limitions act or any other winable complication involved. They may go to any limit to try and limit their costs. In my case alone they

would be saving over £2k and legal fees @ £200 per hour perhaps.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nattie I agree.

 

Let's see what they come back to me with! If they can aviod contractual by settling early then I guess that will reduce their liabiliies by at least 30% on the basis of my own claim.

 

I think that s69 is a right in a sucessful claim but contractual is at the courts discretion and as I said above, I think there is some evidence they don't like it.

 

Do you have any thoughts about any upper limit cut off point for claims?

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parkvale Hi

 

Will be very interesting to see how they play it. As I said above this is now going to be a case by case process. I don't think its going to be impossible to advise individuals because everyone will have different priorities. Do you the want the money now or are you willing to wait in the hope you get more later!?

 

As I said this is were it gets interesting - a few poker players might be useful! Have they made you an offer?

 

Bicester1

 

 

MBNA WON £623

:-)

GM Card Won £580 :-)

Barclaycard LBA :-x

Nat West Bank offer received negotiating :p

Nat West CC offer received negotiating :p

Lloyds PPI prelim:wink:

 

 

Any advice is given informally. I am not a lawyer. Consult a trained professional if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bicester1,

As good old nattie has already said it is each persons Deal or No Deal.

As i have said before Courage is losing your Fear and Fear is losing your Courage.

Which one is it to be?;) No i have not received an offer yet.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...