Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tower Hamlets - Suspended Bay ticket **Cancelled**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm new to the site so please excuse my ignorance.

 

In August I received a ticket from Tower Hamlets as I'd parked in suspended bay.

The reason I didn't see the sign was because a Waitrose delivery van had parked in front of it,

obscuring the view from where I had parked.

I use a blue badge owing to disability so didn't bother paying at the machine.

 

I subsequently appealed within the 14 day frame and heard nothing.

 

I then contacted TH in October to ask whether my appeal had been successful and

they told me it hadn't and that they'd written to me already and I should wait until I receive further correspondence.

I explained that I had not received any correspondence from them.

Nothing came once again until I received a Charge Certificate a couple of weeks ago stating I now owed them £195.

 

 

The original fine was £130 - or £65 if I paid within 14 days.

They had added an additional £65 on owing to a charge certificate increase.

 

I contacted TH immediately and asked to speak to the head of the department.

Upon speaking to him, I explained the situation and was told to write in and explain what had happened.

I did so immediately and

 

 

on Friday received another letter explaining that "as a gesture of goodwill" they were willing to accept £130 from me.

 

 

My other alternative would be to appeal and enclosed was a form from the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service.

 

Please could someone kindly offer me some advice, namely the following:

 

1) Does anyone know where I can go to find out whether the suspended parking bay was valid,

i.e. had been applied for, for on or around the date I received a ticket?

 

2) Whether I should appeal either way to the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service

on the grounds that I did not receive any correspondence and could not, therefore, pay at the reduced rate.

 

I have only recently started working again this year owing to my disability

and to say money is tight would be an understatement.

 

 

I also offered to pay in instalments in my original appeal and this too has obviously been ignored.

 

Many thanks,

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do nothing for the moment, you should receive an Order for Recovery over the next couple of weeks. With it will be a form to file a Witness Statement, contesting the progression of the PCN. You should do that - complete it, ticking the box saying you did not receive a reply to your representations. Fill in all the details, and you should get the PCN reverted back.

 

(It would be worth phoning them to check if/when the Order for Recovery has been sent - don't just wait and wait in case it also goes astray in the post.)

 

When the PCN is back at the appeals stage, you can do what you need to - appeal it (again) or pay at the original rate.

 

The idea that the suspended bay was not properly valid is pretty unlikely, but I'm guessing your appeal is more to do with the fact that the sign was obscured on the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I haven't seen it of course but if it's an application to PATAS then no, it's not the same. PATAS are an adjudicator, whereas I was suggesting that you try to put the case back to the appeals stage again, as I described.

 

Are you satisfied that the Council considered your appeal, and you have seen their response and still think you have a winning hand? If so, then take it to adjudication.

 

If you play it my way, you'll be back in the appeals loop and will be able to try another appeal first, maybe with some new arguments. Up to you though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Missing out on the reduced fee will not win at PATAS, nor will authorisation for the suspension. The ability to suspend the bay at any time lies in the current traffic orders they simply have to pop up a sign.

You have been given the option to pay the full amount or go to PATAS, going to PATAS is a no brainer as the cost remains the same. Wasting time and possibly missing the appeal deadline writing a complaint to the chief exec because a letter got lost in the post is pointless. At the end of the day you told them you didn't get the letter so they gave you a second chance to appeal, which they did not have to do which is hardly grounds for complaint.

I would just stick to the facts and go to PATAS with the original appeal that the sign was obscured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

 

I am writing an email to the chief executive of the council now - i've lost all faith in their parking services team.

 

I appreciate your help.

 

The advice I gave was to choose between taking it to adjudication or filing a witness statement to get back into the appeals process. I do not advise you email anyone. There is a standard procedure - follow it! Otherwise you'll fall foul of the process and end up with a massive charge to pay.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As per post 2 above - wait for the Order for Recovery, and the forms will be with it. If they aren't, you'll need to get some from either the council or the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court (Google them and you'll find their website - I think you can download the forms there, but I'm not certain).

 

If you need advice on what to put, then feel free to ask.

 

Complete the form, sign it, and send it off to Northampton County Court as per the instructions on it.

 

The form has the code number TE9.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now i'm confused. They sent me a PATAS application following my final letter to the head of parking.

 

Please could someone advise whether I should fill this in and send it off or do something else. I promise I won't hold anyone responsible for offering advice! :)

 

I subsequently sent an email to the Chief Exec of the council and he hasn't responded.

 

Many thanks

Edited by JMCDJ
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you want to go to an adjudicator and argue your case in person? If so, apply to PATAS.

 

Or do you want to get back into the appeals stage so that you can try a written appeal again? If so, Witness Statement.

 

The former might run into problems if a Charge Certificate was issued - it's not clear whether the council have followed the right steps. It seems they issued a Charge Certificate then extended some "good will". PATAS may or may not hear the case, depending what happened. Also, following the latter course will buy you more time to decide what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...