Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

IVA with Churchwood/Kingsgate Insolvency. Money Gone Missing?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

probably nothing at all to do with you last letter

just std stuff they send out

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 292
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

probably nothing at all to do with you last letter

just std stuff they send out

 

 

dx

 

 

No its definately in response to the letter that I sent last week,

 

 

in my letter I wrote that NR had not provided me with all information held in my wifes name despite the SAR we had made to them.

 

 

The MArlin letter I have received today makes direct reference to this part of the letter by stating

that they (Marlin) have not had a SAR from us (which they havent as I just sent a request for the CCA to them).

 

Their latter also makes reference to my request for the NOA and the statements telling me to go to NR to ask for them.

 

 

THis is why I began to think I had sent the letter to the wrong place before I realised that I hadnt. The full letter is below

Link to post
Share on other sites

then NR still need to honour the SAR and give you the statements you need

 

 

why not phone them and ask why they fwded the letter to marlin when they j know marlin will not have had the data

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then NR still need to honour the SAR and give you the statements you need

 

 

why not phone them and ask why they fwded the letter to marlin when they j know marlin will not have had the data

 

 

dx

 

My question is why did NR forward the letter in the first place? They honoured my SAR ams as you say they would know that Marlin don't have the statements so what was the point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

give in..not worth worrying about.

 

 

legally NR must hold them

its within 6yrs.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell Marlin in writing that the ac is in serious dispute with NR,

 

and demand that they place the ac on hold pending resolution

 

Quote them this from the FCA

 

CONC 7.5.3

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must not ignore or disregard a customer's claim that a debt has been settled or is disputed and must not continue to make demands for payment without providing clear justification and/or evidence as to why the customer's claim is not valid

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

 

though I suspect they already know!!

 

 

if they've had your letters

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

 

though I suspect they already know!!

 

 

if they've had your letters

 

 

dx

 

New request submitted to NR so let's see how we get on this time. Assuming worst case scenario they do not send me the information for whatever reason what will be my next course of action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting on the statements, in the meantime are any of you able to help with another problem.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440259-Housing-Benefit-Cancelled.......Help-Needed-Urgently

 

Sorry if posting a link here is not the done thing but it's a rather urgent issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so we got the reply back from NR today and it was about has helpful as a punch in the face.

 

Heres what they had to say -

 

We have received an urgent reminder/failure to comply from you regarding the subject access. However I can confirm that all documents held by NRAM were provided as part of your original request which was sent out on the 17th December 2014.

 

If you would like to discuss this further....etc etc

 

So they are saying that they have no statements relating to this account which leaves me right back at square one I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring them on the number on the letter

 

ask them directly the question:

 

WHY do they not hold statements from 29/4/2009 onwards

 

it is a legal requirement that they keep data for 6yrs.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but there was movement.payments.thru the DMP?

 

 

so they must hold the data under data rules.

it is within 6yrs.

 

 

where are they?

 

 

if there were no payments then not statements would have been produced

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it a case that NR are saying that they have no documentation regarding the periods discussed as the account had defaulted and was then in DMP and then IVA?

 

from memory in the sar narrative it gives dates of statements and nosia's sent (NRs sar)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read your SAR pages 10/11 under

 

Statements and Arrears

 

From29/4/2009

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking through the event history from NR i see multiple letters that it says theyve sent including Low risk letter, NR default No, Confirm Accep, First installment, CC4650 letter, Rej Mail Dfer, 1st Note Arrears etc

 

Should NR be producing copies of all these letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just having a look at how to get in touch with NRAM in any way other than writing yet another letter to them.

 

I have looked online for an email address but can only find a contact form which I dont think will be much good.

 

The letter I have received from NRAM does have a telephone number but Im not about to waste more money calling an 0844 number and being on hold for god knows how long. THe letter does have an alternative way of getting in touch them and gives a web address of http://www.bbg.co.uk/accessibility but al that offers is a variety of alternative letter methods for the disabled, and is only for Bradford and Bingley or Mortgage Express customers so it is no help whatsoever.

 

Do you guys know of an email address I can use as a back door to getting hold of them or am i going to have to write to them again?

 

I have in the meantime filled in the contact form and requested they provide me with an email address so that I can contact them or I will take the matter up with the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whatever method of contact you use

 

to confirm, we need copies of ALL correspondence

 

statements, notice of sums in arrears, as listed as sent in you SAR

 

from 24/04/2009 to 7/08 2013 from Northern Rock

 

once you obtain these we can move forward with complaints

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got through to nr who have emailed me back with the following -

 

I can confirm that all information and documents held on our systems have been provided in our previous correspondence, Our records show that this loan transferred to Marlin Capital on 28 October 2013 please contact them at;

 

So what can i do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...