Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell chasing barclaycard debt under previous name - am i liable?


MsMT
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been receiving letters from Lowell Portfolio,

all addressed to my married name,

for about three years.

 

 

They relate to a credit card that I stopped paying in February 2009 when I moved

and couldn't get the address changed because I couldn't provide ID in that name

(I reverted to my maiden name in about 2002 after I separated from my husband but couldn't get the name changed on this account).

 

They claim to have taken over the account and, although I didn't receive any letter to this effect from the credit card company or a default notice,

these would probably have been sent to my previous address anyway.

I ignored the letters but they keep coming.

Every time I move house they stop for a while and then start up again.

 

My concern now is that the last letter I had is over a month ago which is an unusually long time

(although I have continued to receive their recorded phone calls every couple of weeks).

The letter stated that they were considering applying for a CCJ

and I am worried that they will go ahead with it.

Are they likely to do that?

 

Can they apply for a CCJ for a person that no longer exists or would they have to contact me under my current name first?

 

 

They have presumably been tracing me under my current name as I haven't had any accounts in my married name since that one.

There are no accounts in my married name registered at any of the addresses they have contacted me at.

 

Should I challenge the debt and thereby acknowledge being the same person or continue to ignore it?

 

I really don't know what to do for the best.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they certainly can get a claimform started leading to a CCJ

and serve it to your last known address

 

 

is this on your credit file?

 

 

whats the debt all about please

 

 

who

when

etc etc.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can sue you in either name...have you ever requested a copy of the agreement they refer to by way of a section 78 request ?

 

I would advise if not.....then the chasing will decrease.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

It was a Barclaycard credit card that I think I took out some time during the 1990s

but the last payment I made on it would have been February or March 2009.

Lowell contacted me a couple of years later, about 2011.

 

I cancelled my Experian membership a few months ago but,

at that time neither the Lowell debt nor the Barclaycard one were showing on my account.

 

 

Would they serve the claim on me at the address they last wrote to me at

or would it go to the last address I was living at when I still had accounts in that name?

 

I haven't actually ever contacted them at all.

 

 

The first letter I got from them stated that they believed rather than knew I was the person they were looking for

and I figured that if I ever replied I would be acknowledging that to be true.

 

Would I have to contact them under the name they use when they write to me or under my current name?

 

Thanks for the responses, I really appreciate the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the account is not showing on your CRA file

 

 

then it was prob defaulted more than 6yrs ago and has been removed.

 

 

however doesn't mean its not owed still mind

 

 

if you last paid in 2009, then it wont be Statute bared either.

 

 

cca time to lowells me thinks

 

 

and p'haps an sar to Barclaycard might be worthy too.

 

 

do you know if you have PENALTY charges or PPI levied?

reclaiming time?

 

 

how much does lowlife claim you owe?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It definitely wasn't defaulted before I stopped paying in 2009

which is why I am confused that it appeared to have just disappeared from my record without recording a default.

 

 

I still have the last statement I received from February 2009 but it is packed away ready for another move.

It was for a little over £500.

 

 

I haven't kept any of the letters from Lowell but I think they are chasing for about £650

so somewhere along the way there have been some kind of charges added

and I think I did have payment protection with them but this was probably way back in the early nineties.

 

Should I contact them under my current name?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could it that's its not showing because

all your old address do not show in the linked addresses section?

 

 

if you are moving again

 

 

it might be better to let the dust settle first.

 

 

then start the CCA & SAR requests.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did think that it was possible that the account might have become 'unlinked' from my record because there were no other accounts in that name at any of my newer addresses. It's part of the reason I am reluctant to confirm the connection because I am not sure they can be certain they have the correct person.

 

I guess the best thing to do it to wait for the first letter after I move and start from there (assuming they don't just go for the CCJ without trying to trace me again).

 

Thanks again for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could it that's its not showing because

all your old address's do not show in the linked addresses section?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I've now been able to check my credit file (via Noddle). All of my addresses for the past ten years are listed but the Barclaycard account doesn't show up at all. I don't know if a default notice was ever issued as they wouldn't change my address so I would never have received it. Can they seek a CCJ for a debt that doesn't even appear on my credit file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they can its not SB'd

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...