Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome debt sold to Aktiv Kapital


d006
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently completed a SAR request with Welcome Finance. I wrote to them to challenge the charges on the account, and their total charges are pretty much the full value of the outstanding amount so I was hoping to finally rib myself of this debt.

 

I received a letter from Welcome saying it would take 8 weeks to process the complaint (fairly standard from seeing other posts on the forum).

 

But I also received a letter saying the outstanding balance has been sold onto Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd!

 

Does anyone know where I stand now? What happens if a debt is sold but the charges on the original debt were unfair/excessive, how can that be challenged?

 

It seems unreasonable to me that to get out of refunding charges all a company has to do is sell the debt on, but also who do I fight now? Welcome who have sold the debt and I am not apparently dealing with. Or the new company that hadn't actually charged those fees?

 

Does anyone have experience with this sort of situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently completed a SAR request with Welcome Finance. I wrote to them to challenge the charges on the account, and their total charges are pretty much the full value of the outstanding amount so I was hoping to finally rib myself of this debt.

 

I received a letter from Welcome saying it would take 8 weeks to process the complaint (fairly standard from seeing other posts on the forum).

 

But I also received a letter saying the outstanding balance has been sold onto Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd!

 

Does anyone know where I stand now? What happens if a debt is sold but the charges on the original debt were unfair/excessive, how can that be challenged?

 

It seems unreasonable to me that to get out of refunding charges all a company has to do is sell the debt on, but also who do I fight now? Welcome who have sold the debt and I am not apparently dealing with. Or the new company that hadn't actually charged those fees?

 

Does anyone have experience with this sort of situation?

 

 

Hi, Welcome have 40 days and no more to comply with a SAR. Did you send the £10 statutory fee?

 

 

You cannot combine a SAR and a Formal Complaint, is this what you have done?

The time scale for the complaint is 56 days after which if you have not had a satisfactory response you can complain to FOS.

 

 

You can still reclaim PPI and penalty charges from Welcome

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't combine them. I requested and received the response of the SAR and then wrote a formal complaint letter.

 

After sending the formal complaint letter I received the response from them that it will take eight weeks to process, and a separate letter saying they have sold the debt.

 

Essentially all the remaining debt (which they have sold) is made from unfair charges. I am unsure how to proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

There is a window of 8 weeks allowed for a response to a formal complaint. If within that time you receive a final response letter then you can escalate to fos. If you receive no response within the 8 week deadline then you are again free to lodge a complaint with fos.

 

However, with a charges claim it is rarer than hens teeth for fos to side with the claimant.

 

If you read around the forums you will see that the vast majority take their claims for unlawful penalty charges through the small claims court.

 

There is work involved so it really does depend on how much you want those charges back.

 

Your claim for charges would be against Welcome. The process in simple terms would be to prepare a spreadsheet of the charges and associated interest that you wish to claim back. Then send a preliminary letter giving them, say, 14 days to refund the charges and interest to you. If they fail to do so then you send a 7 day Letter Before Action and if the still fail to pay then you would issue in court.

 

Some institutions settle before a court hearing while others don't.

 

You would need to do a fair amount of reading around the forums but all of the information on how to put together a court reclaim for charges is on CAG.

 

In addition to the charges, was there any mis-sold PPI on the account? If so you can reclaim that as well together with associated interest etc. That claim would also be against Welcome but is a different issue to the unlawful charges claim

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...