Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

statute barred in scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi im needing advice on the only bad debt on my credit file

its small debt of 400 which is defaulted and has been brought by lowells ,now im aware of it being staus barred after 5 yrs as in in scotland ,that 5 yrs is in nov ,thing is my credit file is great at moment apart from that debt

what im asking should i make it status barred in nov or leave it other year and let it fall of my file?

if i do status barred does it stay on my file until 6 yrs are up which is nov 2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not acknowledged the debt in a 5 year period it will be Statute Barred, in Scotland the debt will then no longer exist, although debt collectors can still ask you for payment until you tell them you will not be paying it.

 

There is a template letter in the cag library for this but only send it if you are sure it,s Statute Barred.

 

As has been said the default will stay on your file for 6 years.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not acknowledged the debt in a 5 year period it will be Statute Barred, in Scotland the debt will then no longer exist, although debt collectors can still ask you for payment until you tell them you will not be paying it.

 

There is a template letter in the cag library for this but only send it if you are sure it,s Statute Barred.

 

As has been said the default will stay on your file for 6 years.

what happens if you send the letter and the debt is not statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it acks the debt.

 

pers i'd sit on this for a while unless you get any court docs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what happens if you send the letter and the debt is not statute barred?

Nothing the properly drafted letter does not acknowledge liability for the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a huge difference in Scots Law. One cannot merely be unable to bring an action in court as prescribed by the limitations act in England.

In Scots law" the obligation shall be extinguished"

Occurs to me that reporting a debt as in default when it is extinguished violates the requirement under the data protection act of data to be accurate.

Haven't been able to find any case law to either support or dismiss this argument, perhaps wiser people than I may be aware of such

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a huge difference in Scots Law. One cannot merely be unable to bring an action in court as prescribed by the limitations act in England.

In Scots law" the obligation shall be extinguished"

Occurs to me that reporting a debt as in default when it is extinguished violates the requirement under the data protection act of data to be accurate.

Haven't been able to find any case law to either support or dismiss this argument, perhaps wiser people than I may be aware of such

 

 

Reporting "historic" data as it would be in this case would not be inaccurate the default occurred and the report of this remains on credit files for 6 years SB, paid or not paid.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...