Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

*** caution hastings non fault claims will be met with resistance ***


jay david
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1) You must be the only person who works in the Insurance industry who would risk Insuring their car with Hastings

 

2) Google Albany to see how truely bad their reputation is and how Hastings passed you over to them for a commission of circa £350

 

3) If you had claimed directly off your own Insurance there's a very good chance you could have received £8500 for your car using this from the Ombudsman

 

"9. vehicles recently purchased second-hand

 

If the consumer only recently bought their car second-hand, we generally assume that they paid the market value price – although we will consider any evidence the insurer can provide that this was not the case."

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/motor-valuation.html

 

4) Hastings are good evidence you cannot polish the proverbial

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you again for posting an update about this issue. I am sorry that you feel my involvement in this has not helped to progress the situation. As previously mentioned I have been liaising with the claims team on your behalf to try and understand what the delay is and what we can do to speed up the process. As you remain unhappy with the service that has been provided I have asked that this be fully reviewed by our customer relations team, they will contact you separately once they have carried out their investigation. This will also allow you to refer your file to the financial ombudsman should you wish to do so. Again I am very sorry that you remain unhappy and if you wish to contact me directly to discuss this further please feel free to do so at [email protected] Many Thanks, Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

dacouc i totally agree i was naive however you can never measure an insurer truly until you claim. my partner works for a car insurer recently awarded insurance provider of the year. i wish we paid the extra even though the discount made it more expensive than other insurers to know i would have been treat fairly and a lot better than hastings. i just hope the more people this thread reaches the better. it has now been shared a few times on facebook and twitter so more the better. i understand the process of how hastings are making money off me on a non fault claim which makes it more the worse they are not acting in my interest. im sure when it comes to cancellation they will try harder to make more out of me at no financial loss to themselves.

 

jamie im sorry but this is a fart from resolved matter and even now i have not had a response asking why my engineer report is missing the most expensive part of the damage which is airbag replacement which the 3rd party require to settle with an accurate amount of my loss. its still going from bad to worse and yes thank you for involving customer relations as this is details that fos will need to see how hastings are responding to my ongoing complaints even if unsatisfactory

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't you cancel the Albany claim and claim directly off your Hastings Policy, you can then look for £8500 write off value as per the Ombudsman which I think you have a very very good chance of getting especially if the actual date of the accident is younger than eight weeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the car has arrived back from hastings salvage this morning and i am gobsmacked. the car is stinking dirty inside and outside and even has a half bitten off fingernail on passenger seat. we sent the car to them right after a car wash and inside was spotless now it needs a full valet. am more and more disgusted with how hastings are treating us. even took pics of car which will post if can find out how to on here. so the 3rd party engineer called this morning to ask can he see the car to evaluate it and guess what he was here within an hour. quicker than it takes hastings to even return a call. this evening he called with a offer of settlement including cash in lieu for the car. very impressed and this hastings should take note is how to deal with customers. the insurer are calling us in the morning to arrange payment. so within 2 days i have had an engineer visit give an offer and will start to process payment. it took hastings longer than this to even return a call. i will now cancel my claim with hastings and will also then cancel my policy which i am sure 100% they will become even more akward and start with obstacles in me doing so like asking to retain full premium even though they have no right too or will charge a cancellation fee. hope jamie takes not of this as i wont be happy if any of this happens and will indeed go into complaint to fos that is already growing day by day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...