Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lets draw a line under this. I'm not saying I won't upload documents to this site Consumer Action Group, and I'm not saying that I take issue with with CAG data security. I said, "Can you recommend a free offline pdf editor" this is so I can merge the pdf's into one file as requested. Online utilities can be helpful, but we only have their word that they shall delete the uploaded documents in a given timeframe, but have no means of validating this, neither can we confirm that their security is up to scratch, if they were hacked and they weren't deleting as they claimed, then- And so, as I do not wish to upload my documents to a free online pdf merge utility, and that bona fide tools such as Adobe quite rightly aren't free, and you have a maximum upload of 4.88MB, I offered my website - a source that I can control as a viable alternative. From there we seem to have descended into a chaos of misunderstandings and half-truths
    • We have both a savings account and a current account, so thought we would get the £100 fairer share bonus - but we won't. Why?View the full article
    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Two Defaults for the Same Debt - Lowell / Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3782 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lowell has issued me with a county court claim for an amount left on an old debt. They state they purchased this debt from Halifax earlier in 2013. I have another thread open in relation to the court case, access to info etc.

 

I have just accessed my credit report (experian). It shows two entries for the same loan.

 

1. It is recorded as Lender: halifax. Balance: '£xxx and Status: Default. Default date is 11/02/2011. This has not been updated since 2012, which makes sense if they sold it on. It is also in my married name.

 

2. Lowell Portfolio. Balance: £xxx (slightly different amount) Status: Default date is 16/02/2011. It is in my maiden name.

 

Can there be two defaults for the same debt? It reads like I have two loans, both of which I have defaulted on, when it's the same loan and there is nothing to link the two.

 

I get that Lowell are now the owners and therefore are going to be adding their input onto my credit file, but how should this be recorded, to show that there are not TWO defaults (different amounts, different default dates would suggest to a third party that I had two loans at the same time, defaulted on them both rather than one loan balance being sold to another company).

 

Is this wrong, and if so, how do I go about getting it amended?

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pavlov

 

There should only be one default, for the loan. If the debt has been sold then the Original Creditor should have closed their entry on your credit file, so it appears under 'Closed Accounts'. That's my understanding of what should happen. It looks like you have wrong information on your credit file. There should only be one default date.

 

Lowell has issued me with a county court claim for an amount left on an old debt. They state they purchased this debt from Halifax earlier in 2013. I have another thread open in relation to the court case, access to info etc.

 

I have just accessed my credit report (experian). It shows two entries for the same loan.

 

1. It is recorded as Lender: halifax. Balance: '£xxx and Status: Default. Default date is 11/02/2011. This has not been updated since 2012, which makes sense if they sold it on. It is also in my married name.

 

2. Lowell Portfolio. Balance: £xxx (slightly different amount) Status: Default date is 16/02/2011. It is in my maiden name.

 

Can there be two defaults for the same debt? It reads like I have two loans, both of which I have defaulted on, when it's the same loan and there is nothing to link the two.

 

I get that Lowell are now the owners and therefore are going to be adding their input onto my credit file, but how should this be recorded, to show that there are not TWO defaults (different amounts, different default dates would suggest to a third party that I had two loans at the same time, defaulted on them both rather than one loan balance being sold to another company).

 

Is this wrong, and if so, how do I go about getting it amended?

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, but wasn't sure who it should be recorded as. Lowell also own a debt which is like £20 from 3 mobile. I got a letter today about it which is why I checked my credit file again for first time in a while, and that debt is not there twice, so it made me think that this other debt shouldn't be.

 

So. The question is, how do i get this other one removed? And, if the default dates are wrong here, does that have any bearing on the court claim, or can that just be down to simple admin error or something? I worry that Lowell will make up a Default letter, and put their date down, I wonder if Halifax's own date on the credit file will demonstrate that the letter is not a copy of the original default letter.

 

Either way, I want it removed, as I presume that two defaults affect my credit score more negatively than just the one from this loan?

 

Thanks for replying Rebel11

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel11, it is an unsecured loan which I took out in 2004. I paid most of it off and then due to other stuff going on missed the final few payments. I dispute the amount owed though, it is much too high. So, I have not yet acknowledged it and stated that I will defend, but I was going to defend on the basis that I don't believe the amount to be right and have no information to defend myself with.

 

I had asked on my other thread about accessing the info, and Andy has suggested I use the CPR 32.14 (?) to get documents stated in particulars, Section 77 for the agreement, and SAR for everything else. I was planning on doing all this at the weekend, and then, if no information has been received by the date my defence is due, then I was going to state that the information needed to defend myself has not been made available.

 

I am bothered by there being two different default dates, as it means someone is lying. I don't recall getting a default letter at all (doesn't mean I didn't, wish I had kept all my documents now)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pavlov

 

Andy has given you great advice, information is really the key here, so lets see what they send. As it stands, concentrate on sorting out their court claim.

 

yep! feel free to comment if you have anything useful to add that will help me get everything in the right order.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...