Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds Credit Card


MrPond
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I need some help with my Lloyds Credit Card,

 

I took the card out on 31.10.03 and

got into trouble with it around 2007 along with my Lloyds bank account.

 

I carried on making small payments until 11.1.2009.

 

This has now been passed on to Lowell who are now chasing me.

 

I have sent them a CCA and

 

now have statements and a signed credit agreement (separate page), terms and conditions

and a copy of a loan protection agreement.

I was self employed at the time.

 

Would be very grateful for some help.

 

thanks

 

MrPond

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims21,

 

 

Thanks for the quick response, Lowell have given me 14 days to pay and theirs no chance of that, Would the debt be enforceable in court? Just wanted to know the best route to take with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Lowell will have bought the debt from Lloyds and provided that the paperwork they sent you is on order are entitled to chase for the money.

 

You hint that there may well be PPI on the account. If that is the case and you are self employed you might like to get a PPI reclaim going which will mitigate the amount due.

 

Do you have all of the statements of account? If not send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to the lender to get all of the data on the account. There is a template for SAR in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green. There is a fee of £10 and they will have 40 days to comply.

 

You may have some unlawful penalties on the account which you can also claim back together with the associated interest.

 

Is this your only debt? If not can you tell us about any others?

 

Is there any form of dispute on the account?

 

How much is the debt?

 

From what we know at the moment, if they have complied with the CCA request then yes they could go to court. In addition you should be aware that Lowell could issue a Statutory Demand which is a precursor to bankruptcy proceedings.

 

Have you established that the documents you received as a result of the CCA request are compliant?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have screen captures of statements and these show some figures and abbreviation's by the side and doesn't make much sense. I also have a Lloyds current account with a overdraft and the overdraft limit was £900 now stands at £2300 and lowell are chasing me for that as well. I missed a few DD and the started getting hit by charges and could not recover.

 

 

Their is loan protection on the card as well.

 

 

Is it true that if a signed credit card agreement does not have the terms & conditions on the same page its unenforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these screen captures something that they have sent you or something you have downloaded online?

 

With a SAR you should get data for which, if they have used abbreviations, they must supply a sheet which explains the abbreviations.

 

If there are charges for late payment and being over your card limit then they should be reclaimed, as should the PPI if you are and were self employed.

 

There are prescribed terms which should be on the agreement but other T&Cs can be on a different page or even a booklet.

 

If it were me I would SAR the lender to get as much information on these accounts that you possibly can and start looking at a PPI reclaim. Going back to 2003 it could amount to quite a bit depending on how the card was used.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help ims21,

 

 

I've just received this paper work today so its quite a lot to take in but looking at the screen captures they have sent me its starting to come back to me. This agreement I now have is for a consolidation load and my credit card was moved over to the loan in 2003. sorry to mess you around.

 

 

Thinks its best if I send off for a SAR tomorrow

 

 

I had a credit card before 2003 do you think I could claim back anything that far back?

 

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can if you can get hold of base data going that far back.

 

However you may find that you will need to issue in court to go back that far as the other side are likely to argue that they are statute barred and you would need to counter argue on that point.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a side issue

i'd get a copy of your cra file [see my sigs]

 

its not clear if the debts have been sold to lowells

but I must admit, its unusual for lowlife themselves to just chase debts they don't own.

 

so somewhere along the line

you should have received Notice of assignment letters for the debt they are after?

 

its also quite a good indicator to that if they have been sold

theres something up with the debts

 

this would tally with your detection of PPI & PENALTY charges.

 

looks like if you can prove all this & the consolidation loan details...

you could be in for a rather large windfall here.

 

whilst you ae looking for paperwork

keep your eye open for default notices under section 87 of the CCA

 

those dates could be useful.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...