Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Received the claimants Directions Questionnaire today.  Haven't had anything else through. N180_Redacted.pdf
    • Hi team, I should of really walked away when they said the vehicle had no v5 and I would have to complete v62. They only disclosed v62 form after all documents for finance was signed. However, I needed a vehicle as I was the only driver in my household and my sister was extremly ill and I had to take her to hospital appointments. I purchased a vehicle from big motoring world on the 31/06/24. After driving away the vehicle the very same day I could hear a very distinctive water sloshing noise come from the interior. I then decided to take the vehicle back to branch 15 mins after driving away. The manager came for a ride and said he could hear something but this issue was ‘minor’ and it was my psychologial thinking that made the issue even worse. Manager was very rude. I then took the vehicle home knowing full well it would give me nothing but grief. A day after the rear left tyre started losing air. I know they could say this was probably due to the driver however I believe the issue was present before purchasing vehicle. I called up Audi and my finance company and explained situation. Audi could accomodate me for the 13th for a diagnostic. Finance company told me to take to an independant garage and not BMW. Motonovo been helpful in this situation.  I took vehicle to Audi for a diagnostic. Unfortunantly, they done an Audicam and the technician somewhat resolved the issue without guidance from myself. No charge was applicable as this was a health check. However, I wanted the diagnostic. The car still has water inside. Audi are saying this is a common fault. However, I have no confidence in the vehicle. I have emailed bigassist with all my findings and commanded them to collect the vehicle. Audi shall also be sending me an email next week of the issues they discovered. This was issue pre exisitng. It is still below 30 days, can I still reject? Do i need to send a letter? I have been very direct to BMW that I no longer want the vehicle. please can we assist    
    • lies is all they have @dx to support their adoration of 'little feet'  like trump, farage and bad penny wannabe 'little feet' caligulas and neros, empty of anything worthwhile.
    • I bought my house 2 years ago. The previous owner had died. I continue to recieve parking fines and communication from DVLA in the name of the dead person, despite contacting DVLA via post to inform them I am the new owner of the property. I have sent them proof of purchase and ownership but the communications continue to arrive. Aside from using "return to sender", does anyone have any idea how to stop this and get DVLA to update their records? Not sure if relevant but the Tax class on the vehicle is disabled meaning that the price of vehicle tax is £0 per year. I assume someone is using this to get free vehicle tax which is up to them, but I'm bored of fighting with parking charge companies and getting threatening letters, as whoever is doing this is also not very good at paying for parking.
    • I haven't heard of them asking for photographic evidence in this way before – but I don't think it will really pose a problem. Have you got a history of sending parcels which were then lost and you had to claim for? When you send your letter of claim? Was the item properly declared? Was the item correctly valued? Please answer these questions and then take at least a couple of days reading very thoroughly the stories on this sub- forum. There are lots of them. Read some of the pinned topics at the top which will explain the principles and then read the stories to see other people's experience. Post up your letter of claim in PDF format so we can see what you sent.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EON want payment after saying I was not responsible


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been having a lovely issue with EON.

 

Towards the end of my tenancy at my shared accommodation two of the people

I was living with decided they had had enough of paying bills

and refused to pay their shares after the myself and my other house mate had paid ours.

 

I spoke to my landlord who said I should contact EON and see if they would put the names of the two

non-paying members on the account so they would be chased for payment not myself and my other house mate.

 

First of all I spoke to one of their advisers and told them what the situation was and how/if EON could help.

The person I spoke to said that if I posted a copy of the tenancy agreement

and letter with a brief explanation of the problem they would chase the two non-payers.

 

After about a month of not hearing anything I contacted EON who emailed me a response

saying the two listed were responsible and they would look for payment from them.

 

After 5 months my house mate received a letter from LCS ,at her new address,

saying she owed the amount and demanding payment of the bill plus a £95 admin charge.

 

 

After she sent them a copy of the correspondence I had had with EON

it transpired I had been put on an attached but separate account that owed no money

where as she was on the account owing money.

 

After a few phone calls from her I rang EON and explained the situation.

They said they would sort it.

 

 

After about an hour I received a phone call from a 'resolutions manager' who asked if i was in the property at the time,

I said yes and that I had explained that at the time and all the evidence I sent also clearly showed this.

 

 

He then said he would look into it as it sounded like a 3rd party issue

(something I am now aware of but was not told anything about

and they would also have been aware of it when they looked at the evidence I sent them)

 

After waiting all day for a phone call I rang up and the 'manager' who said EON's legal department

said they can change any advice or correspondence given when they like.

 

After a week this 'manager' emailed saying he was closing the complaint,

that it was 3rd party issue and that the previous correspondence didn't matter.

I then asked for this to go a stage higher, which to his credit he did but failed to inform me he had sent it up.

 

After a few days of waiting I received EON's 'final resolution' letter which was just a copy and paste job from the previous email.

 

I have now taken the case the Ombudsman and hope to hear from them soon.

 

What I want to know is,

can a company say you don't have to pay/aren't responsible for paying

then a few months down the line just say no you are now we have decided?

 

Also according to some bits I have read online firms like LCS aren't allowed or supposed to contact you

whilst the complaint is open,

LCS however have been contacting my house mate through out the process

and although she said only contact her at these times and via this number

they have continued to use another number at times she is at work.

 

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Oh and to say I will never have any involvement with EON again is an understatement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Please be patient I am sure the caggers will be along to give you there wisdom.

 

When the account with EON was setup whos name/s were the account in?

 

Were all Tenants staying in the Property on One Agreement or Separate Agreements?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long ago as this debt?

 

 

LCS as far as I know ARE E.ON's in house DCA anyhow.

they certainly have no legal remit to add ANY admin PENALTY fees.

 

 

something sounds fishy here

 

 

we have E.ON on board here

and they do a good job too

 

 

i'll alert them to pop into this thread

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CV21

 

I'm afraid, now you've received a final position letter from the Resolution Manager and gone to the Ombudsman, this isn't something I can really comment too much on.

 

As far as a general position is concerned, customers named on the account are the ones we'll chase for payment. From what you've said, this certainly sounds like a Third Party dispute.

 

One thing I would say is, whilst there's an open complaint on the account, all follow up should stop. If that didn't happen then you should raise this with the Resolution Manager looking after your complaint.

 

Sorry I'm unable to help further.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Stu

 

There was no name on the account. It was just called 'the occupier', the person I spoke to originally said they would use the info to put them as the account names and forwarding addresses.

The tenancy was a joint-separate one, but again as I sent a copy of the tenancy to the company they would have been aware of this.

Edited by CV21
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dx

 

The debt is for the account that was active between the August 2012 to July 2013. The two bills which owe money are the April one and final bill in July.

 

LCS have added a "recovery administration charge of £94.03" at least that is what the letter to my former house mate says.

Edited by CV21
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks E.ON, in understand that you can't say too much regarding the issue now its with the ombudsman.

 

Obviously I'm now aware that it is regarded as a 3rd party issue. However, as I said, originally I was told the two non-paying house mates were going to be responsible for the bill.

 

Thanks, they've tried to ring and sent her emails during the complaint process. I've informed the ombudsman of the activity of LCS but wasn't too sure how much use informing the resolutions manager was.

 

Can you give me any information regarding LCS and the admin fee?

Edited by CV21
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Cheers Dx!

The account never had a name and LCS only seem to be going for my housemate, I personally haven't had anything from them yet. My land lord is still chasing them for rent as well!

 

As in the above thread, LCS and eon have gained an advantage and created a 'contract' due to the my housemate talking to them. Nothing was ever signed and the only time I had any dealings with the company was when setting up the online account, letting meter readers in, submitting meter readings, paying the bills and when I contacted the company about the original problem.

 

RE: Back Billing. Although the account didn't have a name attached to the account it used my email to set it up and at one point listed my phone number, but I took it down when my number changed. The reason it was called the occupier was due me working away from uni and it meant any letters or bills from eon would be opened by my housemates.

 

Other than the name on the account part of the back billing article we fulfil all the other points. Should I mention this to the ombudsman?

 

I thought this was just customer service issue not something more but it seems LCS and eon have been trying to pull a fast one.

 

Again cheers. I will keep you up dated with anything new.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...