Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC loans with CCJ PPI reclaim


knights templar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folka,

 

HFC Bank ;

 

Defaulted on both loan due to unemployment.

 

HFc obtained a CCJ.

 

Payment in order since Court order.

 

Can I apply for refund of the PPIlink3.gif although there is a CCJ loan and how can I effectively do this.

 

 

Thanks for the quick response to my query;

 

I send an SAR but I am not quite what an SOC is .

 

can you help?

 

Brilliant response

 

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

 

Thanks dx100uk for your assistance and response,

 

sorry not to have mentioned you in my last response to your thread;

 

I was in a bit of a rush and just realised the mistake.

 

do you any chance have the address for HFC where I need to dispatch my SAR request

as I have lost all traces of their address and documentation.

 

I think the debt was sold to Debt collecting Agent called TBI.

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

soc is schedule of charges spreadsheet

 

see ims21's sig for a version

 

as for hfc address

have a look in the hfc forum stickis?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi Cags;

Received a letter today from HFC rejecting unlawful charges on grounds that charges were legit

because on groumds that payment was returned unpaid ; but was eventually paid and that charges were fair and reasonable.

 

They go on to quote OFT regulation2006 which they claim HFC did not accept

but then went on to say that for commercial reasons they accepted it ;

but that those chages did not affect charges that had already been applied.

 

Any comments on their reasons for rejection on my claim for default charges;

 

secondly HFC comment that my PPI application is being dealt with under separate cover.

 

Any comments?:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual rubbish

 

write back giving then 14 days before you start a complaint with the FOS

 

no co. will rollover on your first letter

 

esp HFC!

 

their charges ARE unlawful, they are a PENALTY.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

If you have County Court Judgment have you tried making a claim for the claimed debt to be repaid via PPI

 

The DISPUTE Resolution Rules 2010 for PPI as documented by FSA provide the ability for a potential claim on the PPI and for the PPI to payout the Debt.

 

This would clear your debt and the CCJ

 

I would very much like to know anyone that has tried this in Court.

 

PPI was to help everyone to repay debts rather than end up with CCJ but so far Banks winning

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will be worth more to reclaim it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi CAG, just received an offer letter from FOS advising that HFC can only settle charges and interest applied to account the amount offered by HFC is simply unacceptable ; in the first place the HFC sold the debt to TBI whilst defaults payments were being made to HFC ; secondly ; I do not have details of the agreement with me ; and thirdly since I do not habve the relevant documentation ; I am not in position to calculate the amount of charges and provisional interest made on the default ; do I contact the FOS to express that this offer is unacceptable in setlement of the said amount ?

 

Knights Templer:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CAGs received a settle letter from Fos; settlement letter unaaceptable ; do have details of agreements and default figures to calculate ; do I contact FOS to say this settlement figure is unacceptable and therefore escalate for further settlement consideration?

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

Good question ims21; do not have any documetation on loan and thereforefore difficult to caculate the precise difference between expectation and settlement ; besides this settlement is been made under the understanding that HFC does not accept liability and considers its charges to be fair and lawful ; I believe a settlement figure of £66.00 is a bit misery and unfair and a bit suspect to me; what do you think ims21 ?.

 

knights templar:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

Good point ; will write to FOS ; that offer of settlement is unaccetaple on this occasion and that a further review of data from the HFC under SRA be made and recalculated to show the actual a settlement figure ;in the meantime I will write straight to HFC to provide me with all data under SRA request ASAP; what do you think ims21?

 

knights templar:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

you were told to SAR them in sept 2011!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi ims21 ;

Received response from HFC Bank after sending SAR request ;

they require an identity specification like a driving lience or a passport;

frankly I do not drive and do not wish to send them my passport ;

 

I wish to write back and tell tham that ;

that my correspondence with them should form the basis of an identification profile;

also the FOS wishes that I accept HFC offer ;

but they sent a poor illegible breakdown with the excuse that they FOS ;

cannot investigate anything more than 6 years;

 

Is this ifo correct ?

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You can send a utility bill...continued failure to comply should be reported to the ICO.

 

You need to demand a legible breakdown and no it is not correct that fos won't look at anything beyond six years.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi; ims21

Sorry for the confusion ;

indeed this is all very confusing but it is not; two aspects to

this thread one for HFC Bank and one Nat. West. Bank ;

 

Nat West Bank made an offer of £2000.00 said they would offset this against loan repayment after my default ;

wrote to them that this was unacceptable no response yet;

sent SRA to seek basis of calculation ;

response received today that they cannot trace loan agreement and that other documenttion would despatched to me in due course.

 

Claim 2 ; aganist HFC; HFC refused to accept claim ;

therefore complained to ombudsman

;they made an offer of £65.00 through Ombudsman but again offer on condition that to be offset against default loan repayment ;

later SRA HFC ;

no response ;

ombudsman looking into matter as there is basis for calculation of £65.00.

 

You are therefore correct both Banks have not provided any basis for their calculations merely an offer which I am tempted to say this cannot br right ; I am therefore the basis of their offer challenge after you have made your comments.

 

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to split this natwest stuff out to another thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

this is your HFC PPI thread now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...