Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
    • Hi, Please find letter sent to BMW with all evidence off issues which is a link from Audi. Unable to share the footage on this forum as I am not the best with tech BMW FAULTY CAR LETTER.docx
    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't check either. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price - I was concerned this declaration may have been used to single the item for theft. But now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through your huge document store of information, in addition to MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Charge Notice - Smart Parking - Asda


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My colleague at work has received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking, for parking on double yellow lines at Asda whilst she went to the cashpoint.

 

I read the forums here regularly, so understand that we may be able to successfully defend the legitimacy of their parking fee.

 

Can anyone outline, step-by-step, the process to challenge the ticket, or is it a case of 'Ignore' until/if they move to take it to court?

 

Edit: Just read updated advice on 'Ignore' and will pass that on.

Edited by Kaiserfarrow
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else to bear in mind is the nature of the car park. Our Asda car park has barriers, and there is a charge on the ticket to lift the barriers. However at 6 every night the barriers are raised and left open all night, I guess so they do not need to employ night time car park staff. Another cark park nearby has no barriers, and is open entry all round. I parked there and went to town to get money, and when I came back saw an £80 ticket on my windscreen. I decided not to pay as I felt they could not justify the charge of £80, simply for leaving the area. In order to offset this I purchased a couple of small items from one the shops on that site and kept the receipts in case of a claim. Never heard back.

They obviously need to justify their charges in relation to what is to all intents and purposes a 'free' car park. It's difficult to argue that they should have the right to charge you £80 for whatever their fee is on a free car park. As with the Asda car park if the barriers are lifted, and parking is free later, and long term visitors can leave for free after a time, then charging high sums would be difficult to charge for.

 

Apart from that do they even have the right to 'fine' you? So you parked on a double yellow in a private car park. Do they have any legal authority to charge you a large sum of money for doing so?

 

It would be interesting to see them argue any of this in court.

 

D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

My colleague at work has received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking, for parking on double yellow lines at Asda whilst she went to the cashpoint.

 

I read the forums here regularly, so understand that we may be able to successfully defend the legitimacy of their parking fee.

 

Can anyone outline, step-by-step, the process to challenge the ticket, or is it a case of 'Ignore' until/if they move to take it to court?

 

Edit: Just read updated advice on 'Ignore' and will pass that on.

 

What is the parking invoice issued for? If it says anything like 'parking on double yellow lines' then they don't stand a chance as all road markings on private property are meaningless

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

My colleague at work has received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking, for parking on double yellow lines at Asda whilst she went to the cashpoint.

 

I read the forums here regularly, so understand that we may be able to successfully defend the legitimacy of their parking fee.

 

Can anyone outline, step-by-step, the process to challenge the ticket, or is it a case of 'Ignore' until/if they move to take it to court?

 

Edit: Just read updated advice on 'Ignore' and will pass that on.

 

 

 

Oh Dear Dear Dear, It would appear that the lovely Smart Parking( formally TCP) are at it again!

 

One has sufficient knowlege of the world to realise that life does contain some very irksome matters.

 

As HOMER correctly points out, double yellow lines on private land is not applicable as it is not public highway or council and you were not causing obstruction. Please use the following to stop it dead in its track, adjusting to your needs as necessary and point out that the location is incorrect, so the charge is rejected and the debt is disputed!......Good luck.

 

  • Tcp / smart Parking - send cheque to apologise over speculative invoice debacle!!!!
     

    Here's another victory this year, this time Town & City Parking, ( now Smart Parking)............

    My partner received a £70 invoice on 16th Jan 2013 with regard to an alleged parking contravention on private land.

     

    The event allegedly happened in Asda, and we had never been issued with a
    pcn
    link3.gif
    and parking is free with a maximum stay of 3 hours.

     

    Will file drop all correspondence in order.....ENJOY.....
    biggrin.gif
     

    21 January 2013

    Town and City Parking

    5 South Inch Business Centre

    Shore Road

    Perth

    PH28BW

     

    To Whom It May Concern:

     

    parking charge
    link3.gif
    Notice Number: ********

     

    I refer to the invoice for £70 that you sent to me on 16th January 2013 with regard to an alleged parking contravention on Private Land. I note that you do not state what the alleged contravention is.

     

    I have complained to Rob Tippett, Store Manager of Asda Canterbury who stated,"He is more than willing to intervene if I hit a brick wall with you."

    I believe this matter falls under English Contractual Law because the matter does not relate to Public Highway or Council.

     

    My first point to you is this ... I have never received a
    parking charge
    link3.gif
    notice at Asda in Canterbury although, I do shop there at least three times per week, but on the day in question, I was elsewhere. Therefore, your charge is rejected and the debt is disputed. I now require you to provide me with all of the following evidence.

     

    • Photographic Evidence clearly showing the charge attached to my vehicle at the time of the event in question.

     

    • A Copy of the charge notice.

     

    • Photographic Evidence of myself either in or standing next to my vehicle at the time of the event in question.

     

    • A Copy of the contract allegedly entered into.

     

    • A Copy of your Lease Agreement with Asda.

     

    Failure to supply me with all of the above evidence in light of your proposed threats, I will consider an abuse of the Court Process and Failure to prove Liability as in East Kent Hospitals Vs Fagan 2013.

     

    My Second point is that you do not own the land in question, therefore, you have no legal right to enter into a contract with a land user on behalf of the landowner, and so it follows that I cannot possibly breach a contract that does not exist - VCS Parking

    Ltd Vs HMRC 2012.

     

    Even if by some remote chance, you manage to persuade any Court that I am liable; my third point to you is the charge ...

     

    The Charge is a Penalty by virtue of the value of the charge. Indeed that particular car park at Asda is free of charge for customers with a maximum stay of three hours. In view of the fact that the Landowner suffered no loss of revenue, to suddenly ask me to pay £70 is a penalty charge and thus not recoverable in law. Excell Parking Services

    Vs Hetherington - Jakeman 2008.

     

    I would also point out to you that the signage at that particular site is inadequate and therefore contrary to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1997.

     

    Now then ... Should you wish to escalate proceedings against me, I must inform you that I will consider this harassment to which I will seek remedy under Part V (40)Administration of Justice Act 1970.

    I will also be obliged to report your behaviour to the Office of Fair Trading.

     

    I trust that this concludes our business and it is the end of the matter, for which I would like confirmation by reply.

     

    Yours Truly

     

    ************************* ************************* ************************

     

     

     

    ...... Parking Charge Notice Number:*******

     

    Parking Charge Notice - Cancellation 12 March 2013

     

    Dear

     

    Thank you for your recent communication received.

    I have noted the points you raised and would like to confirm that we are cancelling the Parking Charge Notice.

     

    If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.

    Yours sincerely

     

    Smart Parking Ltd

    Collection Department

    Smart Parking ltd also trading as Town and City Parking Registered Office: 5 South Inch Business Centre,

    Shore Road, Perth, PH2 SBW Registered In Scotland: Company Registration NO.SC138255

     

    ************************* ************************* ************************

     

     

    Miss *******

    16 March 2013

    Smart Parking Limited

    5 South Inch Business Centre

    Shore Road

    Perth

    PH28BW

     

    Whoever this may concern

     

    Parking Charge Notice Number: ******

     

    I refer to your recent communication dated 12 March 2013.

     

    Thank you for the cancellation of the alleged parking contravention.

    I now require that you reimburse me for my costs associated in this matter which

    consist of:

     

    2x recorded delivery letters at £ 1.55 each = £3.10

    Stationary and telephone costs = £4.00

    Total = £7.10

     

    I expect your response within 14 days of this letter.

     

    Regards

     

     

    ************************* ************************* ************************

     

     

    21 March, 2013

     

    Dear******

     

    Parking Charge Notice : *********

     

    Thank you for your recent communication received.

    I note your comments and as the
    pcn
    link3.gif
    has since been cancelled for being incorrectly issued we attach a cheque in the sum of £7.10 in respect of your compensation claim.

     

    Please accept our sincere apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused.

     

    If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Smart Parking Limited

     

     


     
     
     
     
     

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...