Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Being Invoiced Monthly by Owners


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was looking for some help with regard to a letter we received over allocated parking spaced.

 

We have received a letter to say that in order to regularise matters going forward they are enclosing an invoice for parking charges due in the sum of £147 plus VAT to reimburse for the period following notification up to the end of October 2013 and charged at £3 per day. Whilst the additional space continues to be used we will continue to invoice you for its use.

 

At the moment we are using three bays for parking because we have two broken down cars which we cannot afford to get fixed. The person who owns the land, which is a company, came round on 12 September to say that their gardener could not get to the grass and we would need to move the vehicles to allow him access and in any event we should move the broken down vehicles. At no time was any dates mentioned to remove the vehicles and no notice period was given when they should start charging for the parking space. Matters were left that we would make arrangements to move the vehicles as we realise we were taking up more bays than we were allocated and rightly so I agreed that I would move the vehicle.

 

Can anyone let me know how I should go about replying to this letter. My main worry is that we were not given a time period in which to do any of this and obviously we will do all we can to resolve the matter but I cannot see how they can charge us for something that we have not entered into. They say that they can revoke this temporary arrangement at any time.

 

Can someone please let me know whether they are entitled to charge us £147 plus £3 a day until the vehicle is removed since no agreement was ever made in this respect.

 

PS. we have been at the property for five years without any problems.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you have one properly allocated parking space and are then using 2 others then then you must expect to be charged for the extra spaces.

Using spaces for storage of broken down vehicles is usually prohibited in private parking areas.

 

There is also a problem if these vehicles are not reported to DVLA if untaxed as 'stored off road' so if the vehicles are untaxed, no MOT, no insurance I am surprised you have not been ordered to remove them.

In this scenario the landowner could have them removed at your expense.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that you were asked on or around the 12th September to move one or more vehicles? How many spaces are you entitled to use, and how long have you been using the extra space(s)?

 

How much inconvenience are you causing - is it just blocking the gardener's access or are you blocking someone else from parking?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have 2 parking bays and three cars, one is broken down and we cannot afford to fix it at the moment.

 

I did say that I would move it as really we cannot afford it anyway.

 

The vehicle does not cause any nuisance whatsoever, it does not block any other vehicles.

 

The gardener has been coming for the last five years and it over hangs about an inch onto grass that he cannot cut! and now this is a problem.

 

We have been using the extra space now for about 4 years! The vehicle was going in the four years we were using the parking bay but recently in the last six months or it has been sorn off road until we decided whether to fix it, sell it or just get rid of it if neither could be achieved.

 

Thanks for your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to dispose of the broken down vehicle urgently then write to the landowner saying this has been done.

 

Either ignore the invoice and hope they're satisfied with that or ask them to justify the charges when there is no contractual basis for them. Alternatively if you want to 'keep friends' perhaps offer to pay half in recognition of any inconvenience you may have caused.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can certainly charge you £3 a day from the day after they gave you the letter so you must decide how long you want to pay the 3 quid. The important point is that the owners of the land have instructed you to do something and you have agreed to their terms by saying you will move the dead cars. No they dont have to say when you need to move the cars by as you have been contracted to pay the money by keeping them there after the notice date.

The entire point about the argumants on this board is that the PPC's DONT have the authority to tell you what to do and that they (try to) enforce an unfair unilateral contract. Yours is a bilateral one and thus not really any room for getting out of it unless you can prove in writing that the agreement is revoked or annuled by the action of the landlord. They would have to be breaking the law somehow to get that one to stick.

Best move is to get rid of your junk by selling them to a scrappie for £20 and offer that to the LL as settlement. I would imagine the money is less important than ridding themselves of eyesores that have obviously caused complaints by your neighbours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...