Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard Non Compliance with SAR - Court Action to enforce compliance


lukeman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

 

I wonder if someone might be able to assist on my POC.

 

Basically in Jan 2010 I made a SAR with Barclaycard and they only sent me statements and back in Feb 2010 I sent them a NON Compliance notice and they simply ignored it.

At the time I had lost my job and was going through tough time so I did not follow it up.

 

Fast forward July 2013 I sent them a new SAR request, again they sent statements only. Then I sent them non compliance notice and letter before action and still they had not responded.

 

I would like to get a court order to enforce compliance as per below kindly please review and advise ways to improve it.

 

I gather they are hiding something as the account was sold to Lowell and they don't have CCA and only sent me an application form. Further they issued 2 default notices, one in Dec 2006 and one in March 2009 when I stoped paying the token amount as I could not afford it.

 

I assume the last payment date (Jan 2009) would take precedence rather than the default notice being issued back in Dec 2006 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

POC - Please review the highlighted section

 

1. The Defendant is a Data Controller within the meaning ofthe Data Protection Act and is responsible for the processing of data of whichthe Claimant is a Subject.

 

2. The Claimant had an account number (49/ 53) ("the Account")with the Defendant which was opened on or around 21 Jan 1997.

 

3. On 20 July 2013 the Claimant sent a Subject Access Request, pursuant to Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to theDefendant.

 

4. The Defendant has failed to comply for the second time.

 

5. By virtue of the Defendant's failure to comply with the Subject Access Request the Claimant has suffered damage (and distress).

 

6. The damage (and distress) caused is:

 

Extra costs incurred in addition to court costs, due to the Defendants failure to comply - this includes the cost of additional correspondence and time spent preparing documents and seeking legal advice, I estimate this cost to be £495

 

On the Jan 2010 theclaimant made the first request for DSAR which the defendant failed to comply thus the reason the claimant made a second request on the 20th July 2013 and yet again the defendant failed to comply fully.

 

The defendant had defaulted on their obligations since Jan 2010 until now.

 

The claimant had incurred cost since the first request in Jan 2010 to date as the claimant refused to comply with their obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

7. The Claimant seeks an order that the Defendant do comply with the Claimant's Subject AccessRequest

 

8. Under the terms of Section 15(2) of the Data ProtectionAct 1998, where the Defendant contests that information requested under the Claimant's Subject Access Request is not included within the scope of Section 7of the Data Protection Act 1998, the Claimant requests that the Court inspects that information, and where it finds that the Defendant's opinion is unfounded,that it orders such information be included within the information supplied to the Claimant under the Subject Access Request.

 

9. Damages and costs within the discretion of the Court.

Edited by citizenB
formatted
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Agreement, is that what you are seeking to have the provide to you, Luke ?

 

I am a little concerned in that, the Information Commissioner has advised that they do not have to provide a copy of the agreement within a DSAR as it is covered under the Consumer credit Act Request (s78).

 

In respect of your Default notice. If one was issued in 2006 and you subsequently remedied that by either paying the arrears requested or even a token sum then they will be able to issue a further Default Notice.

 

I will have someone pop in to provide further assistance

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks CitizenB for the prompt response.

 

I made the SAR to get full disclosure from Barclaycard as I am entitled to. But all they want to give me is statements.

 

I gather something is up or might be trying to hide something.

 

Whats more I just had a letter from Lowell saying Barclaycard had complied with my SAR....... but I never sent them the original request and nor ever mentioned to them I made SAR to Barclaycard.... Why is Lowell responding on behalf of Barclaycard.

 

I think I would ignore Lowell as my request was sent to OC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I wonder if someone might be able to assist on my POC.

 

Basically in Jan 2010 I made a SAR with Barclaycard and they only sent me statements and back in Feb 2010 I sent them a NON Compliance notice and they simply ignored it.

At the time I had lost my job and was going through tough time so I did not follow it up.

 

Fast forward July 2013 I sent them a new SAR request, again they sent statements only. Then I sent them non compliance notice and letter before action and still they had not responded.

 

I would like to get a court order to enforce compliance as per below kindly please review and advise ways to improve it.

 

I gather they are hiding something as the account was sold to Lowell and they don't have CCA and only sent me an application form. Further they issued 2 default notices, one in Dec 2006 and one in March 2009 when I stoped paying the token amount as I could not afford it.

 

I assume the last payment date (Jan 2009) would take precedence rather than the default notice being issued back in Dec 2006 ?

 

Just hang on here before issuing any claim.

 

First a formal complaint to the Data Controller at Barclays, to give them a chance to rectify the non compliance, you can also make a concurrent complaint to the ICO.

 

The 'claimant' has not made any reasonable attempt to resolve prior to issuing the claim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier,

 

Please see the letter I sent them before, was it sufficient as per pre action protocol;

 

DataController

Barclaycard

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – DataProtection Act 1998

DearSir/Madam,

I am inreceipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my DataProtection Act information request dated 20 July 2013. The disclosure of personal data is incompletein that at least the following documents are missing.

You have failed to provide:

1) A complete list of transactions andcharges.

2) Full copies and transcripts of ALL correspondence in postal, email orany other format between Barclaycard and myself.

3) Full copies and transcripts of ALL correspondence in postal, email orany other format which you have entered into with Lowell Portfolio I Ltd whichcontains my personal or financial information, or which pertains to me.

4) A list of third party agencies to whomyou have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of theinformation you have disclosed.

5) The original signed, executed Credit Agreement/sand any terms and conditions that applied to the account/s at the time theaccount/s was/were opened.

6) Truecopies of Notice of Assignment, Termination Notice and Default Notices or enforcementnotice that you had allegedly sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage thatyou hold.

7) Full hard copy print outs of ALL my personal or financialinformation, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held inany archives, backups or other storage devices / locations includingmicrofiche.

8) Copies of ALL documents which include ALLof my personal information including copies of contacts or invoices, emails orcomputer records containing my personal information, or any records whichpertain to this information including Full telephone transcripts and fullscreen shoots.

9) Documents relating to any PPI added tothe account/s, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions,date/s they were/ it was added and deleted. (if applicable).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must make a section 77/78/79 request to legally request a copy of any agreement...not a DSAR

 

I thought I was correct. It is very unlikely you will be able to force them to provide a copy of the agreement via a DSAR.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks for your valuable contributions.

 

Just to clarify;

 

I know for sure there is no CCA as I applied for the Barclaycard at University open day and just filled up a form and got the card. Never signed a CCA. So I just addedthe CCA request on my letter to see their response. But most importantly I want all the information pertaining to subject data (yours truly).

 

I did not do the SAR to simply request CCA but for full data disclosure.

 

Hope this clarifies the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the items in your list do not meet the test for 'personal data' under the DPA. The courts have limited this concept to information of a biographical nature relating to an identifiable individual. You can't get generic documents through a DSAR.

 

I do not think you can enforce a right to items 5 or 9 under a DSAR. I think items 3, 4 and 6 are too wide. Copy of a CCA Agreement should be requested through a CCA request. Things such as proof of postage and details on PPI should be requested through asking for pre-action disclosure.

 

I imagine there is a CCA ... not likely you can accurately remember what documents you signed 16 years ago.

 

Your POC would need some work before it is issued. You have to be careful. If you issue it as it currently stands, it would probably not get allocated to small claims and you would end up with a bill for thousands of pounds in legal costs if you lose. For a cautionary tale refer to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?386041-Wandered-into-court-costs-minefield.

 

The courts have generally been quite hostile to use of DSARS where the real purpose is to obtain documents for use in litigation ... best to complain and see what their response is, and revert back for help with the POC before issuing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the items in your list do not meet the test for 'personal data' under the DPA. The courts have limited this concept to information of a biographical nature relating to an identifiable individual. You can't get generic documents through a DSAR.

 

I do not think you can enforce a right to items 5 or 9 under a DSAR. I think items 3, 4 and 6 are too wide. Copy of a CCA Agreement should be requested through a CCA request. Things such as proof of postage and details on PPI should be requested through asking for pre-action disclosure.

 

I imagine there is a CCA ... not likely you can accurately remember what documents you signed 16 years ago.

 

Your POC would need some work before it is issued. You have to be careful. If you issue it as it currently stands, it would probably not get allocated to small claims and you would end up with a bill for thousands of pounds in legal costs if you lose. For a cautionary tale refer to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?386041-Wandered-into-court-costs-minefield.

 

The courts have generally been quite hostile to use of DSARS where the real purpose is to obtain documents for use in litigation ... best to complain and see what their response is, and revert back for help with the POC before issuing.

 

Cheers Steampowered, much appreciated for your advise.

 

Let's see if they respond to my letter sent last week and will revert back as soon as.

 

As per POC, when the time is right I would need your assistant as well as the good folks here, Brigadier, Citizen among others.

 

Cheers

 

Taken all comments on board and look forward in working with you and the good folks here t

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify folks,

 

All I want from Barclaycard is my data..... And nothing more.

 

they could have atleast provided me corespondances, telephone logs including SMS, and any other identifiable data as I am entitled to.

 

I am not sure how they are going to explain refusing my request for the second time.

 

follks,

 

shall I try the ICO first and do you know how long they would take to investigate and respond to me ?

 

Or I should build a strong case by pursuing internal complaints for another 2-3 months...... To data controller and CEO.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I imagine there is a CCA ... not likely you can accurately remember what documents you signed 16 years ago..

 

I know for sure I never signed CCA just application form and card came through few days later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some applications can qualify as an agreement.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...