Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Statute Barred Accounts on Credit Files?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You shouldn't "threaten" anything. If you are not going to follow through with any "threats" - don't make them. Not only does it make you a laughing stock, it allows them not to take the next person seriously.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Calm down Charlie!

As CB says approach this by way of an appeal for goodwill.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charley,

 

Write to Ronan Dunne

CEO Telefonica UK

Executive Resolution

Suite K

Arlington Business Centre

Millshaw Park Lane

Leeds

LS11 0NE

 

You will get a prompt reply, the resolution of my problem was swift after trying to cancel a contract rolled over without notice.

 

Going to the TOP really does work.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any good Brig,

 

Dear Mr. Dunne,

 

I am writing to regarding an old account I had with O2 that was closed in late 2007/early 2008. It was an 18 month phone contract which was run immaculately for 14 months and then I ran into financial trouble as a student and unfortunately was issued with a default notice.

 

I am concerned at the actions of one of your employees when I purchased the phone at your store in Liverpool city centre in September 2006. In the process of buying the phone the employee had to run a credit check but your systems were not working and she asked me to wait. So I waited and we tried again and it still would not work, so she asked me to come back later that day to try to buy the phone again. She made it quite clear before I left the store that I had not purchased the phone. I did not return to the store later that day or at any other time, however a week later the phone arrive at my house. I was very surprised and was immediately struck by what I thought was an illegal act by your employee to later start the purchasing process again, run the credit check and complete the transaction using my bank details that she must have saved without my presence or permission. As I did not want to cause any hassle for myself or the employee I just carried on paying the contract.

 

It is not my intention to cause any problems for your company or the said employee even though there are legal questions to be asked about what happened. The default only has 4/5 months to run on my credit file and it was for a relatively small sum but it is making life very difficult for me. I would be very grateful if under these circumstances you would consider removing the default as a gesture of goodwill on your part.

 

I do not admit liability for this debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any good Brig,

 

Dear Mr. Dunne,

 

I am writing to regarding an old account I had with O2 that was closed in late 2007/early 2008. It was an 18 month phone contract which was run immaculately for 14 months and then I ran into financial trouble as a student and unfortunately was issued with a default notice.

 

I am concerned at the actions of one of your employees when I purchased the phone at your store in Liverpool city centre in September 2006. In the process of buying the phone the employee had to run a credit check but your systems were not working and she asked me to wait. So I waited and we tried again and it still would not work, so she asked me to come back later that day to try to buy the phone again. She made it quite clear before I left the store that I had not purchased the phone. I did not return to the store later that day or at any other time, however a week later the phone arrive at my house. I was very surprised and was immediately struck by what I thought was an illegal act by your employee to later start the purchasing process again, run the credit check and complete the transaction using my bank details that she must have saved without my presence or permission. As I did not want to cause any hassle for myself or the employee I just carried on paying the contract.

 

It is not my intention to cause any problems for your company or the said employee even though there are legal questions to be asked about what happened. The default only has 4/5 months to run on my credit file and it was for a relatively small sum but it is making life very difficult for me. I would be very grateful if under these circumstances you would consider removing the default as a gesture of goodwill on your part.

 

I do not admit liability for this debt.

 

Hello Charlie,

 

Yes that's good just split it in to paragraphs so it's easier to read.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Brig,

 

Finally got the statements from Lloyds, I've sifted through them and here's the outcome.

 

20th August 2007 - Overdraft limit of £1,500 exceeded, balance around minus £1,800 and never brought back into line. No payments in after this date.

 

Late November - Overdraft limit increased to £2,400

 

Late December - Overdraft exceeded again...balance now stands at minus £2,700. Last payment out, last activity on the account except for future fees and interest.

 

January 2008 - September 2008. Fees and interest accruing until account passed on to DCA. Final balance £3,800

 

 

 

Of the £3,800 balance £1,250 was charges applied once the overdraft was exceeded. So even without the charges I would have been £150 over my overdraft. In the 6 months running up to exceeding my overdraft I payed slightly over £150 in charges and interest. With these included I would have been just under my overdraft limit of £2,400.

 

Do you think we can do anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Brig,

 

I received a reply from Capital One basically saying that the default was placed 6 months after I missed the first payment and it's within the guidelines and they will not alter it ect. Any ideas on if it's worth writing back or should I just wait for it to expire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fletch70,

 

I wrote the letter to them acknowledging they acted in a timely manner but requesting they reset the default date to 3 months post instead of 6 as a gesture of good will. I've read that most banks reply they have to comply with the rules so I gave it a shot as 3 months is within the guidelines. I'm going to write back to them I just need ideas on what angle to take or maybe the address of somebody higher up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's only got a couple of months left to run before it is off?

 

No harm in trying ..I will leave it to the Brig although if I am totally honest I do not see a lot of hope (but stranger things have happened)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it needs to be whoever owns the agreement now.

 

hang on I see that this is for an OD . It all depends on when they made the demand for payment and closed the account. If you do not know that then a SAR to LLoyds would be in order (costs £10). This would identify when this happened

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh that's the crucial point here, wether statute barred in last activity by me or the date it was recalled. If it was the latter I'm best just leaving the thing alone because it's probably so close to the default date it's not worth attempting early removal. If it's last activity by me it barred in 3 weeks with another 8 months to run on default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?411313-Cause-of-action-statute-barred&p=4415336#post4415336

 

 

It will only be last activity if they had already closed the account and that was part of agreed repayment

 

I would suggest let sleeping dogs lie on this one unless they are being funny

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to get that default off as soon as possible so I can my independence back. After everything I have read and especially Brigs opinion I'm leaning towards it being barred 6 years after last activity. Especially as the account had been overdrawn for 4 months and they were demanding payments and applying charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'rule of thumb' is 3 missed payment results in a default.

 

Cause of action not ever making any more payments, so SB = date when a payment was due after which no further payment was ever made and no unequivocal admission of liability in writing over 6 clear years.

 

 

 

 

 

+

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...