Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no DCA is a bailiff end of neither do they have any legal powers whatsoever. i would write to everyone simply giving your current abroad address , inc proof of residency. that will stop all threats going to anywhere else.  
    • Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some questions, please: When you say nothing will happen, my 80 year-old mother is worried about potential DCA doorsteppers if/when the debts are sold on - she is a very sweet, quite vulnerable lady and she is worried she may be bullied and harrassed.  If they do come knocking, what should she say?  I told her to say she knows nothing about any of it and they have no right to come knocking on her door and to warn them police will be informed if they come back.  Problem is, I don't think she would be strong enough and can easily be bullied into saying more than she intended once the door has been answered. Next questions: 1)  Should I inform all my lenders that I have moved abroad before defaulting (to avoid the quirky English law loophole thingy that could end up in a CCJ or worse once a DCA gets hold of it)?  2)  Can/should I provide an alternative UK correspondence address to my lenders instead of my mother's home address e.g. my virtual office address for my business - would the lenders accept this as I live abroad now and don't live at my mother's address?  Can I just write and tell them, without any further ado and not get into any further questions about it and cease further correspondence with them and default?  And would this stop DCAs coming to my mother's house as it would not be my current residential address on the lenders files when passed to the DCA?  Do they doorstep previous addresses? 3)  If I don't provide a UK correspondence address will I be at risk of not being aware of any Letters of Claim etc and legal proceedings notices etc not reaching me (there's no reliable postal system in the developing country I've moved to).  Worried this would mean I could end up being taken to court without being aware of it and could end up in a worse situation. 2) What exactly will go on my credit file once I've defaulted, assuming no legal action is taken against me?    4) Should I contact any of my lenders and inform them I have zero assets.  TSB & Sainsburys already have I&E info from me which shows my income  @ £1200/mth is below the combined total of my debt repayments @ £1300/mth and that my income only just covers essential costs of living @ £1200/mth.  Could it be useful to be on my file that I have no assets, so that the DCA clearly see this when the debt is passed to them? Thanks again for any advice.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • paypal, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there is a certain time limit they have to refund you? thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP! with Endowment Shortfall please!??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi and thanks WMO3

 

I wrote july 2004 made a complaint they said they didn't think there was a problem ....... I then phoned and was told that it wasn't worth claiming so I left it. I then wrote in aug 06 and was told I only had 6mths so tough. I then phoned ombuds and they suggested to try again as a new claim. I id and got a reply asking why i didnt do it within 6mths so i went on to say father in law died previously to this and I was ill etc.. they then asked for further info I just gave them basic info, They have liiked into case and basicall said

Main Points

 

Firstly they cannot consider complaint 6mths later"

Unless exceptional circumstances

barclays object to them looking into complaint because it was over 6mths

They (ombuds) then reiterate the basic info I told them as above but I could exassebate illness??? my partner works in switzerland so he couldnt help they then go on to say however if I have any new points which would make significant difference let them know (ombuds)

 

So it looks as though there not ruling it out completely what do you think

 

Desperate

 

Maria:!:

Maria 1965:p

 

Abbey sent Letter 8/09/06

Overcharged £150 settled in full 15/09/06

 

Now commencing

Barclays (£995) 1st letter sent 17/09/06

16/10/06 Recieved answer offering £115 so sent reject Letter

 

Lloyds Prelim letter sent (£1425) 23/10/06

mhol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's definitely worth another letter. What I actually meant was, why do you think you have grounds for a complaint? i.e what reasons did you give in your original letter for it being a mis-sold policy?

 

A death in the family and illness ARE exceptional circumstances. By telling you to exacerbate the illness they are basically telling you to lay it on thick about how ill you were and about how affected you were by the family death etc.

 

The can consider the complaint 6 months later if you raise separate points and they have to. As they have mentioned timebarring you, when did you receive a letter from Barclays telling you that you had a problem? you basically have 3 years plus 6 months grace to raise your concerns.

WMof3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maria, PS, on a totally separate note, I noticed you have also complained to LTSB re bank charges. Be warned that LTSB are known to reject everything and hope that you don't follow it up. All you need to do is mention the Ombudsman in your follow up letter and that you are seeking legal advice and they will pay out in full.

 

Good luck with that:p

WMof3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi WMO3

 

yes the ombuds seems to support but i need exceptional circum for it to go ahead what should I say, for why its took so long inbetween complaints ,as for the grounds I just used a template off the which website last aug 2006 I cant remember what i put in original letter in july 2004

 

Lloyds ive only just filed on moneyclaim awaiting funds and other things I hope they dont come back with a fob off as its a while since I started initial claim

 

Thanks Maria

 

PS if you want to do this with private e-mail that ok:-|

Maria 1965:p

 

Abbey sent Letter 8/09/06

Overcharged £150 settled in full 15/09/06

 

Now commencing

Barclays (£995) 1st letter sent 17/09/06

16/10/06 Recieved answer offering £115 so sent reject Letter

 

Lloyds Prelim letter sent (£1425) 23/10/06

mhol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Had a giggle today, the mortgage company sent me there dicision and concluded that I had been mis-sold my endowment, but (what a suprise ha,ha,) the balance is the same as if I had taken out a repayment, therefor no compensation is due. having looked at ther calculations I went and made a cup of t, then finished watching the tv. 'cause I was none the dam wiser. should I go to a finacial adviser or not bother.

 

 

if only life was simple

Link to post
Share on other sites

That all depends on if you are thinking of switching to a repayment mortgage now or not. If you are, then as they have upheld your complaint they should have offerred to pay the fees for switching. This can be as much as £300 as solicitors are needed etc. So it's worth checking if you are thinking of switching.

 

Shame about the compensation.:p

WMof3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wmo3,

 

Its nice to have someone who has such good knowledge...:)

 

I am afraid to say that I buried my head in the sands, ignored the notices, hoping for a big win on the lottery...:mad:

 

Now I am close to 5 years away, I need to panic and work out if there is anything I can do. Last year I requested details from the ins companies, they provided these 3 policies and each politely told me that my financial consultant was the point of contact for complaints - he wasnt anything to do with them.

 

To cut a long story short, the FC was a friend of a friend, good at doing lots of business and made an excellent profit.. so much so that he was convicted of various offences, swindling his friend of his money etc etc, lost his business, wife, disappeared...

 

A few endowment get your money back people looked at my problem and didnt want to know... no quick easy profit for them, my only recourse is the Ombudsman I guess - unless you know otherwise.

 

One question which I must have missed - where is the legislation which requires you to complain in a set timeframe? who on earth proposed that? or is this an arbitary thing each ins company decided in order to limit their losses?? if there is no legislation, has anyone challenged it in court??

 

Finally, is there any case law where the insurance companies have been challenged re their alleged agents are not employees of the company??

 

Thanks

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew what a lot of issues!

 

I have attached a link to a great document produced by the FSA which answers a lot of your questions.

http://www.moneymadeclear.fsa.gov.uk/pdfs/endowment_complaints.pdf

 

In short, how your complaint is treated depends on the FC. Was he an independent financial adviser (IFA) i.e he worked for himself and sold a range of different policies from different companies or, was he an appointed rep for one company in particular?. If he was an IFA and has since gone out of business (you can do a search on the FSA website to check if they are still trading by following the attached link)

FSA Register__

 

You can't actually complain to the ombudsman unless your complaint has already been declined by the firm or person responsible for giving you advice. as the role of the Ombudsman is to adjudicate on decisions already made, not to make decisions in the first instance.

 

If your provider has timebarred your complaint, (and these rules came into force in June 2004) it means that they must have warned you of the date by which you must complain, the first link at the top of this post includes details of the rules.

 

Timebarring has been challenged in some local courts and cases have been upheld locally on the basis that the policyholder did not know that their policy was at risk, i.e. they had not received the timebarr letters as they had moved house etc and the Ins Co could not prove that the letters had been sent to the correct addresses. If this has happened to you, you may have a case. As far as I know, no one has sucessfully challenged the legality of timebarring itself. The FSA has recently reviewed how companies are treating timebarred policyholders and their report stated that in most cases the policyholders were being treated fairly and correct procedures were being followed.

 

RE - your final point, as stated earlier the person who sold you the policy must be either an appointed rep for one company in particular a good example would be The Prudential, their agents were called FCs and worked from home visiting clients in their own homes and selling only Pru policies. In this case the Pru would be wholly responsible for the advice given irrespective of where the FC is now.

 

OR a Tied agent the person would be an IFA who may have worked from an estate agent or building society and may have been tied to a particular company or been able to sell policies offerred by any company. If your Fc was an IFA and is no longer trading you can complaint to the FSCS (link in top document as before) They will make a decision on your complaint but will only consider it if you were advised after August 1988. The Financial Services act came into force in April 1988 and affords a lot more protection to you if your policy was sold after this date.

 

Hope this has helped.

WMof3

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...