Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Very Old Barclaycard Charges ***Settled by way of Tomlin Order***


tnook
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a reply from Barclaycard regarding my 1998-2003 SAR request.

 

They claim not to be able to find my statements and need more information.

I provided them with my name and the address the cards were registered to at the time.

 

Interestingly Barclaycard claim that the statements are not in their main system, but they state that they do have them.

In order to retrieve the statements they need my old card account numbers.

Alas I don't have these anymore.

Should I just push harder and insist that my name and address are sufficient?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sweeeet! I found a very old receipt with my original VISA card number on it.

 

Since Barclaycard have written to confirm they have my data and can only access it so long as I have an account number for them to reference it with, well I think they are snookered.

 

Bit annoying can't find any old receipts for the Barclaycard Mastercard I had at the same time.

 

Time to write back to them with the details they requested :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh damn the receipt was for a different card. Back to square one.

 

I have just found the Barclaycard internet account site id's for the old cards. But no card numbers and the account codes no longer work.

 

It does seem odd that the only way Barclaycard can access pre 6 years data is with a credit card number. Here is the letter they sent me:

 

Dear Mr Tnook,

 

I write further to your recent request for information (original enclosed).

 

Unfortunately we are unable to locate your account from the information you have provided. Therefore I respectfully request that if you have any more information that you can supply to help us locate your account (e.g. previous addresses, change of name, previous correspondence from us, account statements or any other account number held) then please send this for the attention of the Data Protection Team at the above address.

 

If the account has been closed it is possible that the information has been deleted from our main system. While we will have all of your statements available, we can only locate them by card number alone once an account has been deleted from the main system.

 

Upon receipt of the correspondence we will then be pleased to honour your request and the information will be forwarded to you.

 

Your sincerely,

 

Barclaycard Customer Services

 

 

Does anyone have experience of getting pre 6 year statements without account numbers?

Edited by tnook
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if they have information about me, their letter states that they do, then it is their responsibility to give me access to that information under ICO guidelines.

 

Barclaycard hiding behind the 'excuse' we organised the information in such a way that makes it impossible to access unless you have an account number shouldn't wash.

 

I suspect if a police investigation of 'terrorists' wanted information about credit card transaction of suspects they wouldn't have to supply card numbers, names and addresses would be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi, I sent BC a SAR asking for list of charges from my MasterCard and Visa from 1998 onwards. They replied stating that they likely had the information on microfiche but unless I can provide the account numbers for the cards they can't retrieve the information.

 

Is this right? Surely they'd index them by name/address etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

I asked for Barclaycard to give me my old statements from 1998-2005 quite some years ago. They replied that they had them on microfiche but needed the account numbers to find them. Which I no longer had. Was this ever resolved or are they still claiming its based on account numbers only?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for merging dx100uk :)

 

is it re a current thread of yours?

have you done a dsar. they should be able to tie up someones prior account numbers to their name

 

I did a SAR a few years ago and they flatly said they had the data on microfiche but needed the account numbers to access the statements.

 

Which I felt was a but off, they should have them indexed by name/address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Dusting off the old thread.

 

I put in a GDPR request to Barclays last month and just got a stack of papers (15cm think) of all my data. Well it seemed that way...

 

Finally Barclays have provided the account/card numbers for my ancient Visa and MasterCard. They had these on record but years ago claimed ignorance and they could not search for statements without them.

 

The GDPR stack came back with a covering letter with an interesting line:"

 

"Your rights don't cover manual records, or records held in highly structured manual files. So please bear this in mind if you've requested details of older accounts or information that's less likely to be stored in files covered by GDPR."

 

I looked at the ICO website and it seems to contradict this. Feels like Barclays don't want to be bothered going through the microfiches.

 

Anyone have any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely.

There are quite a few late and over limit fees from 1998-2003 on both cards.

I can also positively argue they concealed this since they had the account numbers all along and told me they couldn't find them....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just writing the letter to them pushing for the release of the data, now that I have the account numbers.

 

Interesting to note they seem to be arguing in the GDPR response that microfiche systems are exempt from GDPR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that the one. Thanks!!

 

Do you think I should try claim contractual interest? Have there been any successes?

 

I just used the spreadsheet and compared the Statutory 8% vs Contractual 19.9% on a single £25 charge from July 1998. The difference is staggering.

 

For 8% = £91.87

 

For 19.9% = £924.18

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading the Shelley threads. Wow, mind blown. You guys are a great help.

 

Was interested in the amount of interest to apply for restitution. Slick you mention 29.9% as good number. Crumbs if I apply that then a single £25 charge from 1998 will attract compound interest of £ 4,678.68. I expect I have about 30 to 40 of these charges, so the total claim could be over £150,000. This will no doubt attract a lot of resistance from BC. Plus won’t it put me out side the small claims track?

 

I’m willing to give it a go if you can guide me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read Johnhn's tread. Feel really bad for him and annoyed that a judge who is ignorant of the regulations and law can just do that.

 

The lessons I am taking from this are firstly I'll be sensible about settling if it's the right thing to do. Secondly learn everything about how credit card charges are not covered by the OFT vs Nationwide case, so that I can argue it strongly in court if needed.

 

Are there anymore recent examples of BC successfully defending claims?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time limitations.

 

I know we tend to rely on Kleinworth to overcome the 6 years limitation, but I was reading there is a 3, 6 and 15 year limitation which the banks will use to get cases dismissed. See links below from the MSE forum and practical law site.

 

Is this a problem for older claims?

 

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=571302&page=156#topofpage

 

https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/1-518-8770?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Defaul++t)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1&comp=pluk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It's been 3-4 weeks now and no reply from BC. I asked for the statements for the accounts but nothing, not even an acknowledgement. I guess this is standard. What's the next step go to the Information Commissioner or just straight to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to a lady who was nice but had no idea what was going on.

She checked the records and said they send a letter early July.

 

This was the original incomplete set of data.

No mention of my letter from mid July requesting they complete the request with the specific Visa and MasterCard information.

 

The lady said shel'll give me a call sometime next week if she hears back from the relevant department.

 

I don't feel super confident they will comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok called again, they haven't a clue.

 

I have now sent them my LBA giving them a week to get the statements to me.

 

In the meantime I have reported the breach to the information commissioner but I won't hold my breath on them doing anything useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok have reached the end of the road with asking Barclays nicely for the statements/data.

 

Call centre is adamant they only have 6 years of data. Letter back from Barclays saying they have already complied with the GDPR request and won’t process it again. However Iif I want to supply additional information they may look again. All the information was in my previous letters.o

 

Time to escalate it in the courts. I’ll start drafting my claim form tonight, can someone check it before I submit it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...