Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Again Guys

 

well another day, another issue that bites from my previous life....

 

I have today received a letter, diverted from my old personal address, from Marston Group Limited. The letter is in reference to a "high court writ" against a company i used to own.

 

I had no knowledge of any court action against this company.

 

The letter was threatnig to gain access to my property (my previous property) to collect goods. The letter is addressed to the company name, but at a personal residential address.

 

The company is currently non trading and hasnt traded since june 2012, and there is an application into companies house to have the company struck off. The creditor who has issued the court action against the company was aware of this 12 months ago and has received a letter stating such.

 

Anyway, I have called Marstons on receipt of the letter to inform them that I dont live there any more and the person who does had nothing to do with the company. I also informed them that that address was a personal residential address and that it never was associated with any business or traded from there. I also explained the status of the company.

 

The lady, awfully rude, then asked me for my new address, which I refused to give. SHe said she would trace me, find me and attempt to remove goods from my new home.

 

I explained that this was unacceptable and that the business had no assets and everything in the house was either mine, my childrens or my new partners. She said they would still send the baliff anyway and attempt to collect and that I had to prove, with receipts, that the goods in the house were not that of the business and would have to provide receipts.

 

Any advice on where I stand with this? I havent seen any court paperwork or dont know who to speak to to stop this harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the writ is made to your former company and you never signed a personal guarantee for the alleged debt, they can only call on your current address if they can show 'reasonable' evidence suggesting the former company has goods at that address.

 

You appear to have provided everything required of you to the them and the creditor so let them have the expense of tracing you then tell them to take a hike.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, went to a solicitor yesterday and got my free 30 mins consultation.

 

Advice was to let them find me, the creditor in question was sent a letter last July to inform them the company had ceased trading, so as you suggest, I have done everything in the correct manner. The advice given by solicitor was that it would be for Marstons to give good evidence that they believe theat their are assets of the business in my personal property, which there clearly are not.

 

I have advised Marstons of this, who were incredibly rude and aggressive, told them that should they wish to waste theirs or their clients monies trying to pursue this then that was their decision should they wish too, but any visit to my personal property would be met with a call to the police and that I would be happy to attend my local court to inform the judge that no business assets are in my rented house, as the business stopped trading 12 months ago with no assets

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

I have just heard from companies house that the company is now dissolved!!!

 

So I am going to take the greatest of pleasure in allowing these scumbags and that awful woman trying to trace me and spending and wasting their time and money to do so.

 

I will also, should any correspondence arrive at my doorstep or indeed a bailiff, be reporting any party for a clear harassment of a director by a creditor, which is illegal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...