Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I had a parking fine of £75.00 that went to Ross and Roberts to collect, but the cost rose to £174.04 with their charges etc. I didn't get a breakdown of their charges.

 

I didn't argue the case with the bailiff but agreed with him to pay £74.04 immediately and set up an agreement to pay 2 x £50 to settle the balance.

 

Unfortunately I missed the agreed payment date by 3 days but did make the £50 payment, but now they are trying to hit me with a £140.00 Default Charge for paying late.!!

 

Does this sound like I'm being shafted?

 

B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff telephoned me to say I had missed the agreed payment date to which I replied "I paid £50 online yesterday, please check with your office".

 

He called me back 10 minutes later and said the payment had been received yesterday but it was 3 days late so I would have to pay them £90 today to restart the agreement.

 

When I questioned him further he said that there was a default fee of £140.00 and they would take my £50 payment off that £140.00 leaving £90 to pay today to reset the agreement of £50 x 2 months to settle the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ploddertom & Tomtubby for your speedy help.

 

I will be on to R&R first thing in the morning asking exactly what you suggest.

 

I have also just checked the Certification list and can't find this particular bailiff listed anywhere so that will also be a big focus of my questioning.

 

Am I right in assuming that without certification he would be working and levying illegally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will find that out.

 

There is another area that they have made a big mistake on...they have levied on my car which is already levied on for a Council Tax agreement that is in place, so I'm pretty sure the walking possession is void!

 

Let the fun begin :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another area that they have made a big mistake on...they have levied on my car which is already levied on for a Council Tax agreement that is in place, so I'm pretty sure the walking possession is void!

 

Let the fun begin :-)

 

Have you told them & provided proof of this?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are up the creek with the default fee, perhaps it is time for a Formal Complaint to Council copied to Ross 'n Robbers Council CEO, and Elected leader, regarding their unlawful default fee and duplicate levy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are up the creek I reckon.

 

I have the name and contact number for the Head of Collections at the Council Offices and will be speaking to him following the inevitable visit from R&R.

 

Should be an interesting meeting now :-)

 

Thanks Guys for all your input, its given me the will to fight Ross & Robbers all the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A quick update which I could do with some feedback on please.

 

I now have a breakdown of the fees and charges applied to the PNC Warrant;

 

Warrant £82.00

DVLA Check £2.50 (I've seen from other posts that this is not allowed for in the Schedule, is this correct?)

1st Letter £11.20 (Don't recall ever seeing this letter)

1st visit fee £28.00 (as per schedule for under £100)

2nd visit fee £35.00 (bailiff claims they can total the warrant, added fees, vat and then make a charge of 28% as per the schedule?)

 

This totalled up as;

Warrant £82.00

Fees £76.70

VAT £15.34

Total £174.04

 

I paid £74.00 on first visit and made arrangement to pay 2 x £50 to settle.

I then paid the 1st £50.00 4 days later than agreed date.

 

Just had another visit (I wasn't in unfortunately) and now have a letter showing;

Visit fee £140.00 + VAT @ £28.00 = Balance outstanding £218.00!!

 

Even though I have spoken on the phone with the bailiff and made him aware that I know the £140.00 fee is illegal he is pursuing his claim.

 

What should my next steps be?

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...