Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome settlement incorrect


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am very new to this forum today in fact and make pre apology for any ignorance.

 

Also may I provide apology for the long and verbose post, I do feel that in the first instance information is king and assists in an informed response.

 

Please bare with me in summery I feel that Welcome finance have charged me far more than they should have for the loan

I am looking for any advice in dealing with what I consider to be an unfair trading practice resulting from a secured loan with a company called Welcome Finance.

 

Firstly, the loan is fully settled and there are no outstanding amounts.

 

I am also able to say that I am fully aware if I enter into a legal agreement with a finance company I am obliged to continue to honour such an agreement, regardless of my financial situation, thankfully, this is not a consideration in this matter.

 

I will firstly lay out as much information as possible

 

Background;

 

In October of 2008 I contacted a company being Bluesky Personal Finance, Located at Tinturn House, William Brown Close, Llantrnam Park, Gwmbran, ND44 3AB Blusky being a finance broker.

 

Bluesky providing me with details of a finance company that was able to provide me with a loan secured against a property that I owned.

 

I researched the company Welcome Finance, at the time Welcome Finance and its associated companies were correctly licensed and regulated by the Financial Services Authority having registration number 305742.

 

Specific details of the loan to be provided by Welcome Finance.

 

Initial request for total credit to be provided £5000.00

Additions to total credit (insurance premium) £981.51

Total amount of advance £5981.51

Period of loan in months 36

Acceptance Fee £235.00

Broker Fee £250.00

APR 31.17%

Rate of interest per annum 23.87%

Total interest charge over loan period £2375.91

 

The interest rate was very high, however in desperate need to clear outstanding debt as soon as possible, I was then contacted by Welcome Finance in late November of that year, them providing confirmation of my acceptance and them providing me with credit of £6466.51 this comprising of

 

Cash amount advanced £5000.00

Broker fee £250.00

Acceptance Fee £235.00

One off Insurance Fee £981.51

Total £6466.51

 

Welcome finance providing a opening balance date on this loan as 12 November 2008.

 

£245.62 to be taken from my account on or around the 16th of the month for a period of 36 months, the first payment in respect of this matter to be taken 16 December 2008

 

On Tuesday 16 December 2008 a direct debit payment was made to Welcome Finance for £245.62 as agreed with the terms of my regulated agreement.

 

I then continued to make regular monthly payments of the same amount between 16 January 2009 and 16 May 2011.

This amounting to 30 payments

 

In May of 2011 I I contacted Welcome finance and asked them to provide a settlement figure for the loan.

Online inquires; these showed that Welcome Finance were no longer providing financial products and were been investigated there regulator.

 

In mid May 2011 after making my contractual payment to Welcome on 16 May 2011 I contacted Welcome Finance, by telephone and asked for a figure to clear my loan with them, provide a settlement figure.

 

I had a rough idea of what I considered to be the amount in any respect I considered that it would not be greater that the total loan if it were to have run its full length another 6 months.

 

This assumption being based on Welcome Finance initial agreement

 

Loan amount £6466.51

Interest over term of loan £2375.91

Total amount to pay £8842.92

30 payments of £245.62

Total payments made £7368.60

Total amount owing including all

Capital and interest £1474.32

 

I spoke to Welcome finance who told me I owed a sum significantly larger than that owing if I were to continue to make regular payments of £245.62 for 6 further months.

 

Not being able to understand why this should be, I was told that this was interest to settlement, I then asked on more than one occasion to be provided with the calculations that derived these figures.

 

On each occasion was told this is not possible, as these figures were arrived at by a computer and were not based on simple maths.

 

I am able to state that I am unable to recall the exact amount to settle I can say that it was in excess of £1700.00.

I told the person at Welcome Finance, I was not able to comment on their figures as I did not have all the facts available.

In short I made numerous attempts to get Welcome finance to justify the figure them being dam right obnoxious.

 

I eventually told them that I would not continue to pay them until they provided information to substantiate there settlement figure

 

Welcom finance wrote to me on a number of occasions after this demanding payment until 30 September 2011, the wrote to me with a default notice served under S87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The sums described in this default notice;

 

Total amount outstanding £1491.94

Rebate of acceptance fee and charges £0.02

Rebate of insurance £0.00

Collections fees ` £12.72

Default Interest £21.48

Interest to settlement £1855.92

Now this is where I get totally lost.

If I had continued to make the remaining 6 payments of £245.62 as contracted to Welcome finance the total amount that would have to be paid give or take a bit of additional interest on the four missed payments surely would have amounted to simple arithmetic. £245.62 x 6 = £1473.72 plus the adjustments in the default notice £1507.92.

 

This amounting to total payments over the period of the loan of £8842.32 + a bit of default interest and such like. This reflecting the original agreement.

 

Any way I paid them £1058.00 not wishing to be in breach of the notice.

 

This leaving making my total payment to the loan £8426.60.

 

I assumed as the total amount of the agreement was £8842.92 + the add on’s of

Collections fees ` £12.72

Default Interest £21.48

Making a total of £8877.12

Less payments of £8426.60

 

Would leave a total sum to be paid of £8877.12 - £8426.60 = £450.52.

 

When I then asked Welcome for the final settlement in November they provided the following

 

Total amount outstanding £484.32

Rebate of Acceptance fees and charges £00.00

Rebate of insurances £00.00

Collection fees £22.90

Default interst £2.32

Interest to settlement £280.94

Settlement figure to pay £790.48

 

Needless to say I raised an objection to this and was told by Welcome tough, sick of the company I paid

.

Now I may have missed something or have I been made to pay £9217.08

 

After removing of misc fees and interest £91576.66

 

This some being £314.73 that the total contractual amount had the loan continued for 36 months.

 

Please help if you can as I feel that I must be really stupid and mist something

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I think the only way you get an explanation is to make a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998 to get all the data Welcome hold on the account.

There is a £10 statutory fee, use a cheque or postal order marked for statutory fee only, Welcome have 40 days to comply, there is a template in the CAG library for this.

 

Address this to The Data Controller at Welcome.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...