Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sach45
      I Asher to say I was caught shoplifting and I’m scared for my life. Can’t breath

      By Sach45 · Posted

      Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • Ex expat3
      Idr/J&P Emirates NBD - credit card in Dubai

      By Ex expat3 · Posted

      I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • SPM87
      Advice and insight please

      By SPM87 · Posted

      I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • dx100uk
      Judge & Priestly

      By dx100uk · Posted

      depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
    • dx100uk
      ENBD/IDRWW/IDR Legal - letter of claim now statutory demand

      By dx100uk · Posted

      And? dx  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed

IS IT ME?

By IS IT ME?
in Mortgages and Secured Loans

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi Apple,

 

Firstly thank you and I am happy to be stuck with you and IS IT ME.

 

The Judge didn't introduce himself and to be honest I was so nervous I never looked at the list of who he was.

He said he had never heard of the Property Chamber and told me I needed to speak to them to see how long this will take them as he was not going to let this meander Long. Hence 14 days for defence.

The solicitor wanted him to read Paragon V Pender and pulled out the paragraphs he had highlighted.

The Judge said no talk of arrears as this was now a separate issue and he would not make a summary decision in 10 minute hearing after I had bought this to light and he hadn't read it before hand.

The possession was to be sort after if my claims were a red herring and not founded. Because their solicitor kept pressing He actually said that if the mortgage was indeed void and unenforceable then it would open up a lot of other things.

 

Their solicitor was adamant that SPML had the right to be on my deeds and he tried to talk around securitisation which the Judge did understand about, so really the only point I raised was why had the new note holder or people that had my debt had not registered this,as an interested party, the solicitor said they didn't need to and so I told the judge perhaps it might be also as they weren't regulated by the FCA and if done would also need to give me new terms and conditions which they couldn't do. The Judge said he wouldn't rule today on something that may come back and make him look foolish.

 

Thank you so so so much.

 

Allisono.... you did yourself and us all proud....well done.....the lender did not get what they wanted,,,,you came away with your dignity in tact....no need to worry about I & E.....you only have to submit a defence......the ball is in your court....not SPML's........

 

Your letter was enough to cause the judge to respond the way he did.........no Judge is going to risk his reputation in favor of some unscrupulous lender.....

 

To help me to help you further......anything you remember from the hearing today.....post it up......

 

The Judges name will come to you noted on the 'order' he gave today in the post......that in itself could take a while......so.....if you need it sooner.....which i think you will do......call the court in the morning - quote the case number and ask them the name of the judge who granted the order...ok?

 

Just remember......any talk of securitisation is NOT the issue....ok......The issue is the VOID DEED.......the defence will focus on that for you so that the lender understands that 'paragon' has nothing to do with that......

 

I will work on the defence......ask the site team to send it to you directly..........and we will insist that it is not posted on the thread until AFTER the outcome....ok?

 

This is the only way to avoid SPML being 'privvy' to what your defence is going to be prior to the next hearing......i'm just conscious that lenders are visiting the thread too.....and I don't think it is fair to you that they should arm themselves the way they were able to today by virtue of having been allowed to be privvy 'in advance' to your letter.....your application prior to the hearing....

 

Did the Judge set a new hearing date at the same time....just say 'yes' or 'no'......i will pick up on what's going on from your reply ok?

 

Just remember what the Judge told you:

 

"He actually said that if the mortgageicon was indeed void and unenforceable then it would open up a lot of other things" .... and this

 

"The Judge said he wouldn't rule today on something that may come back and make him look foolish."

 

Your in a good place right now.......you should be proud : )

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

alisono

alisono

Posted
Posted

Hi p.j.

 

They were try for a repossession order today. This was stopped pending the deed issue and my submission/defence to be done within 14days.

 

My deed yes stamped by my solicitor and signed by me and my witness, not in the presence of the solicitor just sent back by post.

The solicitor acted for both parties it was part of the deal the broker did, so deed sent back with mortgage offer, I don't actually remember signing a lot so I may ask for a copy of the agreement it just refers to the terms and condition booklet and my son then 17 had to sign something also. I have a copy of the mortgage offer also .

Link to post
Share on other sites
alisono

alisono

Posted
Posted

Hi Apple

 

Thank you.

 

No to the date. Just the time to file the defence. The only thing that he wasn't pleased with was my letter as he said it was not laid out as a defence. He wouldn't advise me on anything he said.

 

Only thing that really gave me hope was when he actually said that on the repossession next time the solicitor my Sk for one Nd they mY grant a suspended one as the solicitor kept asking for him to make an interim order on our payments till then.

 

Yes he said the above .

 

Thank you again , you have given me hope and I also think a lot of other people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
p.j

p.j

Posted
Posted (edited)

oh ok good news you got it stopped my turn next,had my letter from the chamber letting me know they received my letter and its contents have been noted they will contact me in due course where appropriate.

 

p.j

Edited by p.j
spelling

e-petition is live please sign it.. unlawful repossessions..!!!

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi Apple

 

Thank you.

 

No to the date. Just the time to file the defence. The only thing that he wasn't pleased with was my letter as he said it was not laid out as a defence. He wouldn't advise me on anything he said.

 

Only thing that really gave me hope was when he actually said that on the repossession next time the solicitor my Sk for one Nd they mY grant a suspended one as the solicitor kept asking for him to make an interim order on our payments till then.

 

Yes he said the above .

 

Thank you again , you have given me hope and I also think a lot of other people.

 

Gotcha......good.....No problem : )

 

i'll get back to you soon......

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Gotcha......good.....No problem : )

 

i'll get back to you soon......

 

Apple

 

Alisono.....remind me......you have an 'official' copy of your deed?

 

and......was their claim a 'standard' claim for possession?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
oh ok good news you got it stopped my turn next,had my letter from the chamber letting me know they received my letter and its contents have been noted they will contact me in due course where appropriate.

 

p.j

 

You'll be ok......just focus on the un-executed deed when you get to the hearing....

 

speak soon

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
IS IT ME?

IS IT ME?

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well done again another one to the list, wait until apple sends you the documents then GO TO THE COURT hand them in and ask them to stamp your copy just in case they go missing again.

 

DO NOT WORRY about this believe me I've been there and had it anjion the hearings because of this.

The next time you go to court would you like me to come?

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Well done again another one to the list, wait until apple sends you the documents then GO TO THE COURT hand them in and ask them to stamp your copy just in case they go missing again.

 

DO NOT WORRY about this believe me I've been there and had it anjion the hearings because of this.

The next time you go to court would you like me to come?

 

Hi Is It Me

 

You are a gem.......Alisono should take you along....it will definitely be 'case closed'........ ; )

 

Your knowledge and experience on-hand.....brilliant....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
IS IT ME?

IS IT ME?

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes I have offered and am willing!

The Judge knew about the property chamber as it is in there magazine so I think he thought Oh god I am not making any order here. lol

I notice Jabbba jabba very quiet now lol

Even with the application before the chamber he can not make any orders or rulings.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jabba the hut

Jabba the hut

Posted
Posted
Yes I have offered and am willing!

The Judge knew about the property chamber as it is in there magazine so I think he thought Oh god I am not making any order here. lol

I notice Jabbba jabba very quiet now lol

Even with the application before the chamber he can not make any orders or rulings.

 

lol I think I deserve time off, I have been very busy on here in the last few days.

 

We have been able to establish

 

 

 

  • After the LRA 2002 a borrower with a registered estate can in fact grant a charge (charge by way of legal mortgage) to a Lender.
  • The Lender must in fact be registered as the Proprietor of the Legal Charge, as a matter of law.
  • The powers within s23(2) of the LRA 2002 are in fact the powers of the Lender as the registered proprietor of that charge.
  • The fact that the Administration of Estates Act 1925 has nothing to do with the matter of if a Lender can be registered proprietor of the Legal Charge or not
  • The fact that Rule 163(1) of the LRR 2003 has nothing to do with this either.

I feel that some real and meaningful progress has been made in the last few days. :whoo:

 

 

 

Applications and defence's can now be amended and made stronger

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Yes I have offered and am willing!

This will be of use to those that are not confident to take it forward themselves..... : )

The Judge knew about the property chamber as it is in there magazine so I think he thought Oh god I am not making any order here. lol

 

Yes, it was just a blip i'm sure......he will come unstuck if Allisono requests a transcript of the hearing......i can hear the tape being edited as I type.....LOL

 

I notice Jabbba jabba very quiet now lol

 

I'm patient most of the time as you know....but, hey......i'm not going to take time going round in circles with Jabba when there are more exciting and urgent things going on..... no offence Jabba...lol

Even with the application before the chamber he can not make any orders or rulings.

 

That's a good point.....very good point......every borrower can rely on the response letter they get from the chamber to prove that the application has been made......that should stop possession claims moving forward in county courts..........

 

however, in Alisono's case......looks like the 'district' Judge wants to take over........what are your thoughts on that Is It Me?[/QUOTE]

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
lol I think I deserve time off, I have been very busy on here in the last few days.

 

We have been able to establish

 

 

 

  • After the LRA 2002 a borrower with a registered estate can in fact grant a charge (charge by way of legal mortgage) to a Lender.
  • The Lender must in fact be registered as the Proprietor of the Legal Charge, as a matter of law.
  • The powers within s23(2) of the LRA 2002 are in fact the powers of the Lender as the registered proprietor of that charge.
  • The fact that the Administration of Estates Act 1925 has nothing to do with the matter of if a Lender can be registered proprietor of the Legal Charge or not
  • The fact that Rule 163(1) of the LRR 2003 has nothing to do with this either.

I feel that some real and meaningful progress has been made in the last few days. :whoo:

 

 

 

Applications and defence's can now be amended and made stronger

 

Looks like I spoke too soon........ : )

 

Jabba....let it be known......We wish you well

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
caro

caro

Posted
Posted
...we have 'solicitors' who are site team members.....non of whom have come forward as yet to assist this scenerio......it is a new approach.....you only have 14 days......so, your stuck with me and Is It Me for now.........(no offence to our champion site team intended by this comment)

 

We will work on your defence .....ok?

 

Apple

 

Hi apple.

 

Just to let you know that I believe you are mistaken about site team members being solicitors. I'm not aware that any are. I don't know where you got that impression.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi apple.

 

Just to let you know that I believe you are mistaken about site team members being solicitors. I'm not aware that any are. I don't know where you got that impression.

 

No Problem......but I assure you there are solicitors at work on the CaG...non of whom have come forward to assist any Cagger with the issue to do with the deeds?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
caro

caro

Posted
Posted
No Problem......but I assure you there are solicitors at work on the CaG...non of whom have come forward to assist any Cagger with the issue to do with the deeds?

 

Apple

 

It has been known for people to try and add credibility to their posts by claiming to be legally qualified when they aren't, so if you are aware of anyone on CAG claiming to be a solicitor then please advise [email protected] so that this can be checked out, and we can ensure that they are posting within site rules.

 

Thank you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
It has been known for people to try and add credibility to their posts by claiming to be legally qualified when they aren't, so if you are aware of anyone on CAG claiming to be a solicitor then please advise [email protected] so that this can be checked out, and we can ensure that they are posting within site rules.

 

Thank you.

 

Gotcha......

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
alisono

alisono

Posted
Posted

Yes please I would like HI IT'S ME to come along with me,

On my deed I have a copy which is the copy I have always had, a copy submitted to the court last year.

It has my signature on, my witness and the stamp by the solicitor with date on. No term or anything else.

 

At the LR Office it's the same deed they have told me. SPML have point under title absolute that is a restriction saying I can't register any other charges. In the charges party they have Proprietor as name Southern Pacific Mortgage ltd This is interesting as at the time I had a secured loan with welcome finance but the registry says an equitable charge in favour of progressive financial services but this company actually went in to liquidation on the 13/03/13 so I have an application to send to remove this charge not sent yet.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Yes please I would like HI IT'S ME to come along with me,

On my deed I have a copy which is the copy I have always had, a copy submitted to the court last year.

It has my signature on, my witness and the stamp by the solicitor with date on. No term or anything else.

 

At the LR Office it's the same deed they have told me. SPML have point under title absolute that is a restriction saying I can't register any other charges. In the charges party they have Proprietor as name Southern Pacific Mortgage ltd This is interesting as at the time I had a secured loan with welcome finance but the registry says an equitable charge in favour of progressive financial services but this company actually went in to liquidation on the 13/03/13 so I have an application to send to remove this charge not sent yet.

 

Thank you

 

Hi Alisono.....

 

It is important that all Borrowers obtain the 'official copy' of the deed from HMLR......it is only the 'official copy' that is permissible in evidence and will assist the defence I am drawing up for you......

 

You need to apply for it in form OC2....this is a link to the said form:

 

http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/_media/downloads/forms/OC2.pdf

 

It also going to be useful for you to obtain a official copy of the title register...in form OC1.....this is a link to the said form:

 

http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/_media/downloads/forms/OC1.pdf

 

There is a fee of £11.00 for each...(I think...it may be that a copy of the 'title' is slightly less....that may be £7.00 I think)

 

We do not have much time....are you in a financial position to send off for it today??

 

If Not....don't worry.....you can send in the one you have on record with the Draft.....(I will amend the 'defence' accordingly)...but, get the 'official copies' anyway.....you can take them to any hearing you have to attend...ok

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted

Can a Site Team Member please forward an email address to take receipt of the 'Defence' drawn up for Allisono please......It is almost ready........

 

Thanks in advance

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
p.j

p.j

Posted
Posted
Hi Alisono.....

 

It is important that all Borrowers obtain the 'official copy' of the deed from HMLR......it is only the 'official copy' that is permissible in evidence and will assist the defence I am drawing up for you......

 

 

You need to apply for it in form OC2....this is a link to the said form:

 

http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/_media/downloads/forms/OC2.pdf

 

It also going to be useful for you to obtain a official copy of the title register...in form OC1.....this is a link to the said form:

 

http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/_media/downloads/forms/OC1.pdf

 

There is a fee of £11.00 for each...(I think...it may be that a copy of the 'title' is slightly less....that may be £7.00 I think)

 

We do not have much time....are you in a financial position to send off for it today??

 

If Not....don't worry.....you can send in the one you have on record with the Draft.....(I will amend the 'defence' accordingly)...but, get the 'official copies' anyway.....you can take them to any hearing you have to attend...ok

 

Apple

 

 

hi apple shall i get a oc1 ordered? my deeds say official copy of the original i also got a title deed from HMLR which was £3 pounds and is sent via a pdf to download it shows everything on it except signatures.

 

pj

e-petition is live please sign it.. unlawful repossessions..!!!

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...