Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aktiv Kap/hassall SD *** old MBNA Card **Resolved by Tomlin Order**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have just had a letter delivered to me personally by a guy at my door and its a statutory demand under s.268 of the insolvency act 1986. Debt for liquidated sum payable immediately.

 

HELP !! what is this, are they forcing me to go bankrupt ??? it says i have 18 days to apply to court to set aside demand.

 

This if for an old MBNA account that I CCA'd and they sent a copy application form so I have not been paying it - its a really old account ive had it since probably 1990 and its for £14,727.

 

Im really worried that they are going to make me bankrupt so any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

cw

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Don’t panic! As you have seen, you have 18 days from now to respond to this, to apply to have the SD set aside.

 

Please tell us the history of the account. Has it been sold/assigned to a third party?

 

When did you send a CCA request and who to? What exactly were you sent in response? When did you last make a payment? Why did you stop paying?

 

Tell us all you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think this card was taken out early 1990's. In Dec 2009 I was going through a divorce and asked for a cca because there was some dispute between my ex and myself and they didnt send me one. They sent me a letter in January 2010 saying they aplogised for the delay responding and that they hoped to write further in due course. I sent them a letter saying they had 28 days to produce CCA. I actually dont think that Ive ever received anything from them regarding CCA, not even application form. I stopped paying because they couldnt send me CCA and basically I couldnt afford the repayments anyway because of divorce. I have made payment arrangements with other creditors i had and if they had been able to produce the document I would happily have initiated a payment plan.

 

They then sold the debt to experto credite in Aug 2010. I wrote to experto credite and advised them that I had not had copy CCA and on 15 sept 2010 i got a letter off them saying they were contacting MBNA regarding the copy agreements and would contact me once they had heard. I never got a copy but kept getting letters off them, the usual debt collector letter, then I think they sold it to Aktiv Kapital which is who this demand is now off via Wright Hassall.

 

Im a bit shocked because I didnt know they could do this.

 

Thanks

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right have checked through my paperwork properly (as was panicking) and they did respond for that particular account in Feb 2010 they sent me a copy of the application form that I had filled in and a separate copy of conditions of use which they said was printed on the reverse of the application form and with it they sent what I think is a recon of terms and conditions with my name and address on but not my signature.

 

I replied with a letter saying that it was an application form and that I would like the original CCA with my signature on . . MBNA wrote saying they were satisfied that the agreement they had sent me complied with all requirements. I did all this following advice on debt forums regarding CCA rules. I was under the impression that they could not enforce this debt. Anyway, the debt got sold on and letters came from experto credite.

 

Ill be honest and say that I didnt take much notice of any further letters because I just assumed that this was still in dispute because they couldnt produce the original.

 

Thanks.

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given it’s an MBNA account, the likelihood is that any Default Notice they issued was faulty. Do you have copies of any DNs?

 

Have you done any research to establish whether the reconstituted CCA is accurate?

 

Complying with a s78 request is not the same as being able to enforce a debt, but I think that applies to enforcement via a claim in the county court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have done some research but there are many conflicting opinions on whether a reconstitued CCA is accurate and I think that probably only a court could decide in the end, I think some cases have been lost and some have been won.

 

Ill have a look through my letter for a default notice.

 

Thanks

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will still need the original CCA or copy of to enforce the debt in any court, for an account of this age. So you will have to apply for the set aside, as you have no choice. It does not cost you any court fee to do the set aside and if you win they cannot then proceed with a bankruptcy petition.

 

There are loads of threads on here, showing you what you need to do in regard to completing the set aside forms. Have a search and if you have any questions, then post back.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ive checked for default and I have letter dated 23rd feb saying important default notification, basically stating that i am in breach of terms and failure to pay will result in default. I then have one from 1st June 2010 sayin a default is due to register in the next few days. I then have one from 3rd June saying account due to default at the end of the month. My statement from march 2010 has late default sum and over limit default sum on it (both £12) and a notice of sum in arrears. I cant actually find anything that says I have been defaulted but I cant guarantee that I have every bit of paperwork - they may have sent one and for some reason its not with rest of paperwork although I would have thought that I would have kept one with other letters.

 

 

If i apply to set aside and loose what happens ?? do they just make me bankrupt straight away ?

 

thanks

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42405[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42404[/ATTACH]

 

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42403[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42402[/ATTACH]

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42401[/ATTACH]

 

I think these might be a bit rubbish !!!!! ill try and get access to a scanner.

 

No I cant actually find anything that says default notice, only letters saying its about to default.

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Help !! i have mistakenly posted the pics in a post that I was reading earlier today (no idea how I did it !) its a post called lowell/hampton statutory demand won + costs - could somebody tell me how to move the post to this thread please ?

 

thanks

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help !! i have mistakenly posted the pics in a post that I was reading earlier today (no idea how I did it !) its a post called lowell/hampton statutory demand won + costs - could somebody tell me how to move the post to this thread please ?

 

thanks

 

CW

 

Ask the Site Team my dear fellow (try dx) and try to remain calm (easy, you might think, for me to say, however, it really is not that easy for me to say)

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help !! i have mistakenly posted the pics in a post that I was reading earlier today (no idea how I did it !) its a post called lowell/hampton statutory demand won + costs - could somebody tell me how to move the post to this thread please ?

 

thanks

 

CW

 

I have alerted the site team. The pictures are too small anyway to read. It looks like the application form, which as bits which could be a CCA, but is possibly not that actual CCA that you would have been issued with, once your application had been accepted by MBNA.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1990's agreement - the Wilson v Fist County Trust - House of Lords Decision may apply RE sec 127 CCA 1974 (BEFORE 2006 AMENDEMENTS), that is to say, improperly executed credit agreement means that the same cannot be enforced by virtue of said sec 127 CCA 1974 - irrefutable.

 

Further, failure by a creditor to serve a valid statutory default notice = no enforcement action cvan be taken against the creditor - irrefutable

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you !! So my reason to set aside would be that the debt is still in dispute because of the agreement and also I have never received a default notice ??? What then happens if the judge doesnt agree and set it aside ?

 

with regards to the default notice, I have checked my credit report and the default is on there - does that mean that it is assumed they have served me a notice ? Also, does the agency that bought the debt i.e. aktiv capital who bought if off experto credite, have to serve another default notice ? i.e. does one have to be served each time the debt is sold ?

 

Thanks

 

CW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you !! So my reason to set aside would be that the debt is still in dispute because of the agreement and also I have never received a default notice ??? What then happens if the judge doesnt agree and set it aside ?

 

with regards to the default notice, I have checked my credit report and the default is on there - does that mean that it is assumed they have served me a notice ? Also, does the agency that bought the debt i.e. aktiv capital who bought if off experto credite, have to serve another default notice ? i.e. does one have to be served each time the debt is sold ?

 

Thanks

 

CW

 

If the agreement is pre-1990's and improperly executed for the purpose of sect 61 CCA 1974, then the lower Court Judge in these Statutory Demand proceedings cannot argue against the House of Lords judgment handed down in Wilson v First County Trust (you ought to search this case, print the transcript thereof off and peruse the same).

 

Further to the above my dear fellow, if your creditor has not served a valid statutory default on you pursuant to sec 81 CCA 1974, then your creditor cannot seek to enforce this agreement against you.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for that , i will search case and have a read through

 

thanks

 

CW

 

Good stuff

 

In the meantime do not lose sight of the timescale upon which to file your Response to this Statutory Demand ("SD"). Check with your local County Court and ask if they deal with these Statutory Demands.

 

I will send an SOS Site Team member 42man.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help !! i have mistakenly posted the pics in a post that I was reading earlier today (no idea how I did it !) its a post called lowell/hampton statutory demand won + costs - could somebody tell me how to move the post to this thread please ?

 

thanks

 

CW

 

Post with pics moved to correct thread. :-)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...