Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can you appeal a PPI amount after you have accepted the offer?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I'm very new to this and forums so here goes.

My partner called RBS up to get details of PPI account numbers she had on a chain of loans.

She was given the information and the staff member took her through the process over the phone for claimback.

About 1 week later we received letter with 5 offers for each part of the loan chain.

We looked at the offer and the way it was presented looked reasonable. They stated on each offer that "the bank is prepared to refund the insurance premiums and interest that you have paid"

 

However, while chasing details for a mortgage with a different department the staff member said if we would like he would send us copies of all the ppi we have with RBS.

We received this today and the accounts (which I mention above and have accepted the offers and been paid) have much higher premiums paid that stated in the acceptance letter.

 

My question - at long last - is

 

We have accepted the offers and been paid - do we have any grounds to now appeal this on the grounds that

a) they didn't give us the entire facts

b) they stated in the letter that they were going to refund the premiums plus interest.

 

Any guidance would be kindly received

 

Mith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You only get back the proportion of the premiums you have actually paid over together with associated interest and your 8%.

 

There may have been PPI rebates given when the various loans in the chains were settled which would also have an effect on the redress awarded.

 

Have you got all of the paperwork for the loans including record of repayments and settlements etc?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case you should send them a Subject Access Request (SAR) to get all of the documentation they hold on you.

 

There is a template for SAR in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

The cost is £10 and they will have 40 days to comply.

 

Make sure you include a line that says that the SAR is to include copies of all and any agreements you have ever had with them.

 

From the information that comes back you should be able to check their offer to see if it is correct.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent them a SAR but they returned it including the cheque for £10 stating that I would have to send one to each of the different departments for full copies etc. They gave me addresses for loan, cc and mortgages etc.

That would be £30 in total...

 

I'm guessing my question is before i go to that expense : because we have accepted and received the offers, can we then go back to them and say "hang on I think you have made a mistake?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess that the acceptance you signed was in full and final settlement of all claims for PPI against the lender.

 

If that is the case then it might make it tricky.

 

Having said that, I am not the type that would let it go without a fight IF the figures turned out to be wrong and they have underpaid you. I might not be successful but I would give it a go.

 

The trouble is at the moment that you don't know whether their figures are right or wrong.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for replies.

 

I think what we will do is firstly give them a call tomorrow and see if they can explain this and if that doesn't work we will try and obtain the SAR again and see where it leads from there.

 

I will keep you posted for future ref.

 

Mith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Called RBS today and they completely skirted the issue and just asked us to put a complaint in a letter and send to them.

We will post this out today asking for complete disclosure to the way they came to their decision including a complete breakdown.

Worth a try i'm guessing.

 

Mith

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...