Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OMG Just checked Noddle and have defaults every month for old debts PLEASE HELP


riply88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just checked my credit report on Noddle and i have 5 old debts, it has red D's on every month up until now. the original default dates range from 2006 until 2007. I have attached an example.. Is this right?? These are all from companies like lowells, cabot etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA entries must be an accurate and up to date picture of the conduct of the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

I have just checked my credit report on Noddle , and it also shows up the same as yours. I don't pretend to know anything about these reports, but it seems if your not paying the original monthly agreed payment on your loan , you get this red late payment stamp all over it ??.

Yet I have a bigger loan than this which is defaulted, yet does not even show up on my CRA.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I afraid that using Noddle is mostly useless it seems, the data is imo never up to date and often inaccurate.

Late payment markers will be placed each month the necessary payment is not made, which is correct all CRAs do the same.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I afraid that using Noddle is mostly useless it seems, the data is imo never up to date and often inaccurate.

Late payment markers will be placed each month the necessary payment is not made, which is correct all CRAs do the same.

 

Thanks. Although i have just checked Equifax and Experian and they do not do this for most of the debt each month, its just blank, with a red D on the default month. Also, with Experian i have an excellent Credit score, but Equifax is poor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noddle update once a month.

Correct Mike BUT the data is often old, not current and imo is misleading the data subject.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use all 3 regularly for professional purposes, so keep up with the data being processed, my own file shows data relevant to a period 8-9 months ago there have been changes and these have been reported by other agencie.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I afraid that using Noddle is mostly useless it seems, the data is imo never up to date and often inaccurate.

Late payment markers will be placed each month the necessary payment is not made, which is correct all CRAs do the same.

 

Thanks for the info Brigadier.I am also checking experian as well. Is there any ruling with regard to defaulted loans showing up after six years of default ..or is this an Urban Myth ??.

Regards,

Eddy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Brigadier.I am also checking experian as well. Is there any ruling with regard to defaulted loans showing up after six years of default ..or is this an Urban Myth ??.

Regards,

Eddy

 

The ''rule'' is simple ''ALL defaults are removed on the 6th anniversary of the default date PAID or NOT''.

 

So if an entry remains after that it should be challenged immediately by writting to the data controller of the credit reference agency publishing the file, all 3 main agencies should be checked and informed of the error.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally speaking DCAs do NOT actually default accounts, they are defaulted by the original creditors and the |DCA/ Debt Purchaser then updates the file with their details BUT the original default date must NOT be changed.

The ICO states that defaults should normally be placed within 6 months of the cause of action, there can be some acceptions, later placed entries can be challenged as unfair.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi check to be sure that this date is not just the date of the update by the purchaser.

If they have change the date then there is a breach of the DPA (publishing false data) and we can challenge it let me know which DCA and the exact relevant dates and I'll draft a complaint for you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...