Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I absolutely will, I cannot thank you all enough for always being on hand with sound advice. I couldn't have done any of this without you, genuinely.  I cannot afford to donate much right now, so please do not think the amount I have donated is in any way reflective of what I feel is right because it isn't. I don't have a million pounds to donate right now, nor will I ever most probably, but I do promise that when I am back on my feet a bit more, I will donate again x
    • Sorry - Spoke to soon...    So great news!  - They should remove it in 28 days. Hopefully it should be enough to ward off any further issues with account closure etc  What you need to do is keep this letter and use it should any further account be closed from this further point. You can actually challenge it and provide the evidence - Should give the provider course to reconsider. May even beable to take it to your old bank etc     Also ask for confirmation from MCB that they will not be placing another CIFAS marker going forward to cover all bases.    Also one more thing,  - Please consider a donation when you get a chance Glad we could have been some help  
    • There has been a development Submitted the N225 application yesterday.   MCOL now states: A Bar has been put in place?? (Take it that means cannot enforce judgement) A defence has been filed with the court This has all happened on the 34 day, so a day late the defendant's submission.??? Options???   Please note that the defendant can still reply to your claim until the court has processed your request. If the defendant’s reply is late but arrives before or even on the same day as your request, it will have priority.  
    • Will do  I know I still have the debts to tackle but now that marker is off I can breathe and focus on getting a plan in place and being debt free in a few years (with the help from this group of course) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Buying a house that is under threat from repossession


mitford
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4172 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

We are in the process of buying a house which is now under threat of repossession, the current owners have done an extension which has not had its final building regs sign off due to some minor work which needs completing and our mortgage company have now put a full retention on our offer until the building regs certificate is issued.

 

The current owners had a repossession hearing on the 3rd of this month and have been told to come back again on the 3rd of next month for another hearing.

 

After the hearing this month they have managed to borrow the money to get the building regs signed off which will be done this week.

 

Due to Christmas being just round the corner and knowing how long our mortgage company will take to remove the retention from our mortgage offer ( upto 10 working days once they have received the certificate) this will take us past the 3rd of january when they have there next court hearing.

 

once the retention has been removed we are all ready to exchange contracts though this will probably be after there next court hearing but only by a few days i imagine.

 

So my question is how likely is it that the court will issue a repossession order as this is the second hearing?

what is the likelihood of them taking into account that we are ready to exchange contracts?

 

sorry for the long post and thanks in advance for your help

 

Jamie

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for the quick reply, apparently they have allot of equity tied up in the house which will clear the debt and leave them with a nice lump sum, they are keen to sell it to us rather than going down the repossession route as they get more money by selling it

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for the replies, i have one more question

 

if they get given a possession order when they go back to court on January 3rd is it still possible for us to buy the house from them before the eviction date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

reading this on the gov.uk site on possession orders

 

"Outright possession order

 

This gives the lender a legal right to own your home on the date given in the order and is sometimes called an ‘order for possession’. This is usually 28 days after your court hearing.

 

If you don’t leave your home by the date given in the order, your lender can ask the court to evict you"

 

 

 

reading that(worst case scenario) we would have 28 days to push the sale through no?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news we got the retention removed yesterday, though the solicitors are now closed for christmas typicall. Does anyone know if it is possible to exchange contracts before the 10% deposit has cleared? the reason i ask is they go back to court on the 3rd an solicitors open on the 2nd so it would be good if we could exchange before they go back to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the current owners take a letter from their conveyancing solicitor along to the hearing the judge will extend untill completion.

  • Confused 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Great news :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...