Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Transcom Worldwide/motormile finance uk/old simplyBe debt - says debt cannot be SB'ed!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You have it that's the letter'' belt and braces'' no risk yes include the statement in caps.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have only sent a letter to Transcom (S Woodward), should I have sent a letter to MMF too? It seems they are responding quicker than Transcom. Thanks

 

Please can I have a response to my last post (as quoted). It would appear that Motormile Finance are are admitting the debt is statute barred. I would rather hear it from them than wait forever to get a response from Transcom Worldwide. What do you think? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good MMF are admitting these debts are SB just leave TWW hanging do no more, I have started the complaint trail to the OFT, this not a small problem I think.

Leave TWW out of the loop, please let me know if TWW come back to you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I've also received one of these letters today, advising that they are collecting a debt for the amount of £361.97. I know I don't owe any money. My immediate concern is if somebody is out there using my name fraudulently. And...how come there has been no previous correspondence about the alleged debt? There must be lots of people out there receiving these letters and just paying the debt that this company is stating in the letter. I will follow the advice in earlier comments and send the "prove it" letter first and see what comes back.I will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK welcome to CAG, have TWW stated exactly what the original debt is yet?

Do you consider that ''IF'' the account was yours, if it would be statute barred(6 years, 5 in Scotland without any payment or acknowledgment in writting) it seems that many if not all of this tranch of debt aquired by MMF are very old JD Williams accounts covering many different catalogue titles.

 

I am preparing a mass report for submission to the OFT regarding the conduct of both MMF and TWW in regard to these debts, please send the prove it letter and keep us posted here on the reply.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK welcome to CAG, have TWW stated exactly what the original debt is yet?

Do you consider that ''IF'' the account was yours, if it would be statute barred(6 years, 5 in Scotland without any payment or acknowledgment in writting) it seems that many if not all of this tranch of debt aquired by MMF are very old JD Williams accounts covering many different catalogue titles.

 

I am preparing a mass report for submission to the OFT regarding the conduct of both MMF and TWW in regard to these debts, please send the prove it letter and keep us posted here on the reply.

 

I gave this some thought after reading this thread and the only thing I could think this is related to could be a debt with La Redoute. This was created as a result of fraud (they admitted liablity because they delivered goods to a different address), but that was at my previous address and it was at least 8-10 years ago? I haven't used any catalogs since then - just stick to credit cards and I'm up to date with all of my credit card payments. I posted the letter last night so - TWW won't get it until Tuesday. I will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sounds interesting, have you checked your credit files yet? If not it would be a wise move.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, have received a Transcom letter today asking for £155.78 on behalf of Arrow Global Gurensey Ltd.

Have no idea what it's referring to, the last debt I can remember was from a disputed account with Orange some 7 or 8 years ago when I was at a different address.

I'm looking through the thread to try and work out what action to take but I've not dealt with any of this before and nervous about making the wrong move - would be very grateful for any advice anyone can offer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG,

 

I think this is another of a tranch of statute barred debts being hawked around by the likes of Arrow Global and MMF, TWW have been assigned a large number of these, so 7-8 years no payment or written acknowledgment statut barred so send the followinh to:

 

Sarah Hayward

Head of Collections

TTW (UK) Ltd.,

 

Ref: As on their letter.

 

Dear Ms. Hayward,

 

I refer to your lettter dated xx xx xxxx in which you allege that I owe a debt for £xxx .xx , I have no knowledge of any such alleged debt and do not acknowledge and debt to TWW (UK) Ltd or any company you may claim to represent.

 

As I monitor my credit history closely I can confirm that any such alleged debt is STATUTE BARRED, therefore I will not now or in the future make any payment or offer of payment.

 

I am aware of the OFT Guidance 2003 updated November 2012 and the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debt.

 

I would suggest that you return this matter to your client and close your file on this matter.

 

Furthermore I must remind you that should you dispute my statement the onus of proof that this alleged debt is not statute barred lies entirely on TWW (UK) Ltd and your client, it is not for me to prove the alleged debt is statute barred.

 

Send recorded deliveru and check receipt.

 

I would expect you to receive confirmation of receipt on a template letter that states ''we can confirm that this account does not fall under the Limitations Act 1980 and therefore is not statute barred''.

 

IF/when you get the letter come back to me and I take the next step for you.

 

I am preparing a mass report to the OFT on the conduct of TWW and would like to include your case please.

You will now cease to process all data relating to me and remove it from your files immediately.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG,

 

I think this is another of a tranch of statute barred debts being hawked around by the likes of Arrow Global and MMF, TWW have been assigned a large number of these, so 7-8 years no payment or written acknowledgment statut barred so send the followinh to:

 

Sarah Hayward

Head of Collections

TTW (UK) Ltd.,

 

Ref: As on their letter.

 

Dear Ms. Hayward,

 

I refer to your lettter dated xx xx xxxx in which you allege that I owe a debt for £xxx .xx , I have no knowledge of any such alleged debt and do not acknowledge and debt to TWW (UK) Ltd or any company you may claim to represent.

 

As I monitor my credit history closely I can confirm that any such alleged debt is STATUTE BARRED, therefore I will not now or in the future make any payment or offer of payment.

 

I am aware of the OFT Guidance 2003 updated November 2012 and the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debt.

 

I would suggest that you return this matter to your client and close your file on this matter.

 

Furthermore I must remind you that should you dispute my statement the onus of proof that this alleged debt is not statute barred lies entirely on TWW (UK) Ltd and your client, it is not for me to prove the alleged debt is statute barred.

 

Send recorded deliveru and check receipt.

 

I would expect you to receive confirmation of receipt on a template letter that states ''we can confirm that this account does not fall under the Limitations Act 1980 and therefore is not statute barred''.

 

IF/when you get the letter come back to me and I take the next step for you.

 

I am preparing a mass report to the OFT on the conduct of TWW and would like to include your case please.

You will now cease to process all data relating to me and remove it from your files immediately.

 

 

Thanks very much, I will send this first thing tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please forgive me i am new to this forum, i received a letter from TRANSCOM today in my maiden name, (married sept 06) at my new address. Regarding a debt that has been passed from PROVIDENT to BCW group to motormile to TRANSCOM.

I have contact them regarding this supposed debt, that they are reporting was taken out in NOV 2006 i have no idea what the debt is, i stated that i have had dealing with provident prior to 06 but not during my marriage as my ex husband had everything in his name they have said they are going to request the details from their client but i am a little worried the amount being asked for is 69.60 but i have NEVER been approached before moving or since moving to pay this debt, i was told by JADE today that the account is not covered by something (sorry cant remember the word) because its doorstep collections and different rules apply

 

can anyone advise please

 

have just clarified with EQUIFAX that there is no trace of this debt against me

Edited by kat232
new info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a letter from Transcom myself chasing a debt for £326.59 the creditor allegedly being ebay. I have bo knowedge of this debt whatsoever so I gave them a call and was advised that the debt was from 2005. I did mention that the letter they sent was pointless due to the 5 year statute but I was advised that because it was an online account it was statute exempt.

 

I was also advised that I could either aknowledge the debt or they would report it as fraud.

 

Utterly ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome, I guess that you were told that ''this account idoes not fall under the Limitations Act 1980 and therefore is not statute barred''.

If what they about this alleged debt is not something you recognise DO NOT CONTACT THEM ESPECIALLY NOT BY PHONE!!

What rubbish!!

 

Check your credit reference files asap please, to see if it show!#

You mention 5 years limitation period so I assume you are in Scotland?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have checked mine with equifax and it shows nothing, i have spooken to them upon receipt of the letter this morning as i was baffled about what it was all about. please advise as to what i should do i asked them to clairfy the account and to prove the original signed documentation for agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...