Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cap 1 refuse to remove default after ombudsman order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ongoing issue with Cap 1 thought was resolved ages ago.....

 

I've had threads relating to it before here but it is still not finished!

 

Briefly, had Cap 1 loan with PPI added + interest. All paid except a portion of PPI that I refused to pay when I realised it was useless (self-employed). A/c in Dispute.

May 2008 took it to ombudsman.

Oct. 2009 result - PPI must be refunded + interest. Cheque rec'd for balance after witheld part of PPI deducted.

Aug 2011. Saw CRA report. Default showing from Cap 1 Nov 2008!!! No wonder my score was crap.

Referred case back to ombudsman (who had ordered the loan be reversed to how it would have been without PPI being added - it would have been in credit!).

Aug 2012 Ombudsman ordered Cap1 to remove default and pay me compensation (punitive, but something). Chq rec'd 4 weeks later. Default removed from Experian.

 

But not Equifax. They are refusing. Ombudsman told Cap 1 again to remove Default. Still refused. Even though I sent Equifax a scan of my letter from the ombudsman and various emails between us proving that they must.

 

My plan is to send a LBA to Cap1.

 

3 questions if anyone can help, please:-

 

1. The correct address to send the LBA to at Cap 1. The last address I had was in 2009 - has it changed? Cap1 PO Box 6750, Nottingham, NG2 3YA.

 

2. Because this has impacted my family life seriously, how do I calculate it in terms of compensation if/when it goes to court? The main thing was re-mortgaging. We had to get a buy-to-let mortgage on our property in order to raise funds to buy another house for us. Because of my 'bad record' I had to have my name removed from the deeds on OUR house we were renting out. The new mortgage was put in my husbands name only. The new mortgage for OUR house had to be in my husbands name only, too.

 

3. Does 'defamation of character' still apply these days? I certainly feel I have been discriminated against.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi workaholic.

 

Take a read of this thread it will convey the process for damages :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?291299-Durkin-v-HFC.-Anyone-tried-it&highlight=durkin

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I remember seeing a thread elsewhere about your troubles.

 

The court is generally much quicker than the ombudsman. Certainly you should be able to claim an easy £5K for general damage to creditworthiness at your local small claims court. You must also claim to have the default removed.

 

I agree you should receive much larger damages for defamation but this will involve going into the higher courts which is very stressful and where you're unlikely to recover all expenses.

 

If £5K's enough for you, you should be paid before Xmas.

 

Good luck.

 

Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're probably wasting 7 days given Cap 1's past performance.

 

I'd go to your local court in the morning and lodge a small claim. Let the court work for you.

 

You'll be surprised at how quick things can happen

 

For example, when they receive the small claim, they may well remove the default and offer a beer chit plus expenses in compensation. It'll then be up to you if you ride it out for another 4 weeks(ish) on your way to £5K.

 

Hope your problems are soon resolved.

 

Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right, of course. OK, is it N1 or MCOL?

 

Sorry if it's a stupid question but I've been searching so many sites and I want to get started online.

 

It's more the default removal but now it's got this far I want to claim for the damages this has caused.

Like you say, may aswell go for the max.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd really try and lodge a small claim live at your local court. There's a chap on here - Noddy, that has had terrible problems jumping through all these N1/MCOL hoops etc. online. I know nothing about it myself but suspect that Andy could advise you if necessary.

 

It may work differently in England but in Aberdeen you can simply get a short form from the Clerk of the court who can tell you what needs filling in. You'd then take the completed form and a copy back to the court for them to serve on the defenders.

 

Most of the time, you just sit back and wait for the defenders offer.

 

I'd like to see someone get this easy £5K though. Noddy seems like he might be the first.

 

That should simply be a matter of showing up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can file on line MCOL or use the N1.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both of you!

 

Found the N1 form, filled it in online.

 

Brief details of claim:- I've put (an approximation of details)

1.removal of default,

2. financial compensation re adverse impact on credit history resulting in unable to obtain mortgage, restrictions to business expansion.

3. incorrect data on CRA's contrary to data protection laws

4. refund of costs incurred by being forced to take this action.

 

Value:- 5k + costs

 

POC to follow.

 

Does this seem about right? What about character defamation? Is there still such a thing? Not sent it yet (I know, I'll have to re-type it all!).

Unsure about value? Should I make it under 5k?

 

With the mortgage refusal thing, it was the broker who insisted I was excluded as it was pointless even applying with a default. Might he have to confirm this in writing? How much do I have to 'prove'? Hard to put a figure on my 'losses' - all I know is that from being a confident business-owner, I became a mouse!

Link to post
Share on other sites

For general damages to creditworthiness (it's form of defamation in itself) you can get £8K without proving actual losses. All you need to show is that the default is there and the evidence that proves that it shouldn't be there.

 

Sadly the small claims court restricts us to £5K but I understand that this has been under review and will be increased.

 

I'd skip data protection laws unless you're willing to quote all the spiel that comes with it.

 

I'd print the form and take 2 copies to your local court. If you file it online you'll be adding at least a month to the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But not Equifax. They are refusing. Ombudsman told Cap 1 again to remove

Default. Still refused. Even though I sent Equifax a scan of my letter from the

ombudsman and various emails between us proving that they must.

 

equifax refusing? i know creditor has been ordered to remove default, but also note s159 consumer credit act. would that be of any help also?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Ford. Been through it all 3 times + now! (and that's only this latest round). Equifax keep coming back to me saying Cap 1 have been contacted and they say the info is correct and must remain. They say they can't remove info without direction from creditor. Then proceed to remove the note I placed......even though I sent them scans of the letter from FOS and emails between us....and after talking with a 'human being' in customer services for nearly 2 hours! She promised it would be solved quickly.....no such luck...goes round in circles, as usual. Each blaming/hiding behind the other. Pathetic.

 

Experian have removed ALL record of it - credit score SHOT up!

 

Thanks, Durkin, for the tip about going to the court in person. I can easily do that. Also, for your help in removing some of my waffle!

 

Really appreciate all this help! Thank you again. It does allay some of my accumulating frustration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you serve equifax a 'further' notice under s159, 3? if so, then they should've applied to ico for an order ss4,5? ie 'unless it intends to apply to the ico under ss5' then they should comply with the notice of correction.? failure to comply with any given order is an 'offence'.

anyway, creditor is the main issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Ford, that makes sense now. Experian told me to do the NOC for another a/c, BC, 'impasse' can't do more until/unless I take them to court. (I suspect that one was terminated - I accepted it in writing, heard no more, charges + int come to way more than bal now, so leaving be for now).

 

Sent a NOC to Equifax, too, same time, will check if it has been attached to report.

 

Didn't know it was section, s159,3. Do now! So, if Equifax refuse my NOC for Cap 1 they have to apply to ICO under ss4,5 ? (not sure what this is?) Presumably I can quote this at them? Will check my facts first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Durkin, for the tip about going to the court in person. I can easily do that. Also, for your help in removing some of my waffle!

 

 

 

 

If you are in England or Wales all money claims must now be issued through the Salford Bulk Centre or MCOL.

 

Your local Court will no longer issue a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Ganymede, saves me a wasted trip. Back to plan A, online it is.

 

Checked on Equifax report and as I suspected NO attachment of NOC to the other a/c. Re-sent it by raising an online complaint.

We'll see - they are SO arrogant! Do they think they only work for the lenders??? About time they got some come-uppance, I think.

 

Attached the NOC for Cap1 in a further request, this time quoting s159 and reminding them of ss4,5,6 if they don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going off-tangent for a minute. Whilst searching around for Monument 'payment break plan' (PPI in disguise) I came across this about PPI http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...read.php?61081

 

With this PPI reclaim from Cap 1 (relating to this thread) could I demand a further sum for repayment of the PPI as ordered by FOS? I got the sum of the PPI, added upfront to the loan, + 8% stat int. It was easy to calculate because it had been listed as a separate figure.

 

From this article, it explains that the PPI, added upfront to the loan, also attracts interest on the entire sum over the entirety of the loan. If this is right I suspect that there is a lot more to be reclaimed, by a lot of people, me included! I shall ask my husband to calculate it (mathematician) tonight.

 

At the time of accepting the 2nd FOS ruling (Aug 2012) I did ask for a different adjudicator to check the calculations by Cap 1 to make sure they were accurate. I guess this is still ongoing. Will do more digging. Hope this might help others to get more money. Will add it to my POC which I'm currently working on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the calculators, Ford. Sorry about the link - guess it was an old thread I stumbled across.

 

What I hadn't realised was that the interest, added after PPI and loan amount, should have been claimed back aswell as the stat 8%. No-one tells you that!

Another £500 there to add to the final bill!

 

How many others have missed out??

Link to post
Share on other sites

know what you mean. if compounded at the contractual rate then that should be paid back rather than just the stat int 8% (if its more of course :)), but it seems fos only do the stat interest? ims21 could help on this?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

quick question re £5,000 small claims. i've been having a look around - is it not £3k in Scotland or am I missing something ?

cheers

 

believe it is so currently 3k in the breakaway republic! how is this relevant to this thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

believe it is so currently 3k in the breakaway republic! how is this relevant to this thread?

 

thanks, thought it may be relevant as Richard has quoted £5k a few times on the thread. anyone looking for an "easy £5k" north of the border may find themselves heading to the main court if the limit in small is £3k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had an email from Equifax to say Cap1 have now removed the Default.

Great.

 

EXCEPT the missed payment markers are still showing which were recorded whilst the dispute was with FOS.

As I explained before (and why I had to go back to FOS a 2nd time), I had paid the loan in full + a fair chunk of the PPI. Nor had I ever missed a payment over the 4 years.

 

As I haven't got round to filing the court papers (mainly because FOS asked me to give them more time after she told them again to remove the Default) shall I still pursue it to get these markers removed? I have asked Equifax to remove them but, a)they take ages to respond and, b)they will probably pass the buck to Cap1 bleating on about it not being their resonsibility.....

 

I don't think it reflects my past record correctly at all. In fact, in my Final Letter Before Action to Cap1 I did say that merely a 'Settled' marker was not acceptable. And surely it affects my score?

 

It's not that I am afraid of taking it to court, I'm more afraid of it being too 'trivial' for the courts.

 

Experian removed the whole record from my report, as if it never existed. I would have expected Equifax to do the same. Am I right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...