Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
    • and speaking of cover-ups .. from the environment agency with collusion/negligence  from the ICO   Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture ICO - waffle Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests | Environment Agency | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture   Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill Exclusive The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary concern'    Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill INEWS.CO.UK The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary...  
    • As Dan Neidle pointed out on Twitter/X, pensioners used to have a higher personal allowance before they paid tax, but this government removed it a few years ago.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lowells statutory demand - **SUCCESSFULLY SET ASIDE - PLUS COSTS ** CHEQUE RECEIVED NOW **


d33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

up to you, you said before that the current cred who has issued demand said they cannot provide required docs?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

2 problems submitting my set aside forms yesterday :

 

went to the court yesterday, despite it being the one on the demand letter, it was the wrong court, and despite being told on the phone by someone from the court that i yesterday would be within the timescale (as the 18th day was a weekend), it appears this is wrong, even though the person checked with 3 people :roll:

 

I was told i would have to pay £35 enter another form explaining why for was being entered late, so i wrote 'wrong court put on the demand' i posted recorded delivery yesterday.

 

It seems these companies are deliberately entering wrong courts to confuse things,when people are trying to set aside, i dint get a chance to mention this on my statement, but will at the hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

i did mention that weekends would be inclusive! ie calender days.

anyway, yes use all that re lateness albeit a couple of days. hopefully a hearing will be set where it will all be heard, including the lateness. afaik, reason for any lateness can be entered on the same sd set aside form.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter back to day saying application to extend time for bringing the application to set aside was stood over by judge *****.

1) application needs to be amended to make application to extend time in which to apply to set aside.

 

2)the written evidence in support of application needs to state the reason for making the application out of time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

they havent sent back any paperwork, they have cashed the £35 cheque and i clearly stated on the form which was stamped by the clerk, that the reason was for being late was they had put the wrong court on the demand. Any ideas what i do now? does this mean i have to go all the way to the court to refill in this one form again? this is dragging on

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can set out the events exactly as they happened

 

SD was dated 11th Spetember

Received by you via normal post 2nd October

You submitted your 6.4 and 6.5 and accompanying documents on (date)

 

You can even state that you believe the creditor is deliberately attempting to abuse the process by not having made any attempt at personal service and then posting it to the defendant without any time to allow a set aside at all...

 

And claim your flipping costs back.....

 

It wouldn't be the first time they had abused the process !! there is another thread on here where the creditor appeared at a hearing and had not even served the petition !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the demand was delivered by the process server around 3 weeks after the date on the demand, ( from what i have read, the date of delivery is what counts)?, also on the late form stamped by the clerk at the court i put down that the wrong court was on the demand(didnt mention that they were deliberately trying to deceive me though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: lowells statutory demand

 

re #56, did they send that re form 6.5 or that 'extra' form you did?

 

the letter is vague, i think i will ring the clerk tomorrow to find out exactly what i need to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt put anything, because when i turned up to the court i thought i was at the right one and i was within the 18 days( i spoke to a court clerk the friday previous, who sounded like they were on work experience, to put it kindly who checked with 3 people that i would be in time if i submitted on the monday. On the monday i was told i was at the wrong court and i was given wrong information about the time to submit

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt put anything, ..

 

hence poss why #56! at least j has given further time to explain. could also refer j to that extra app'n you did?

as suggested, any app'n out of time needs to be explained, and extension requested, on 6.5.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

well, could include all this in your reasons and also refer to this 'extra' form that you were told to do

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

order says an 'amendment'? as 42man says, could just involve an additional/addendum. double check with court whats required, post back re what they say.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

the hearing date is set for next month. Just wondering what i need to prepare myself for, the judge i assume will have read through the statement, what i have sent is quite detailed.

 

will they just read through it and ask me questions, what sort of questions are they likely to ask?

i havent heard anything back from lowells regarding the set aside application, is quite likely that they wont turn up ?

Edited by d33
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...