Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Postie v Abbey :claim acknowledged


Postie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Encouraged by this group and the OFT ruling this week I've jusr posted off my letter to Shabbey demanding the refund of £202 in charges.

What particularly pees me off about the charges is that they arise from Shabbey sitting on my cash for a day.

I transfered some money from my business account into my personal Shabbey account. Under the BACS system the money is with Shabbey the next day but they don't credit your account for another 24 hours.

So, they hold the money back from my account for 24 hours forcing my account to overdraw and then charge me Shyloch like fees.

Is this taking the piss or what ?

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck in getting your money back.

 

Was this the preliminary letter requesting refund, or the actual letter before action? Either way, you have set a timetable, and you need to drive it - do not be deterred by the banks 'looking into it for 28 days' type responses...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's okay - you have given them 14 days to respond positively before you send a second letter before action.

 

For £202 you are likely to get a letter back offering half, which you are strongly urged to refuse...or at least accept it as part of your claim, but you will still be pushing for the rest. This is YOUR money - you want it ALL!

 

They will also fob you off with 'we'll get back to you in 28 days...' Fine, but that doesn't concern you...after 14 days send the second letter before action.

 

Good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received 2 standard looking letteres from Shabbey, shown below for the benefit of others.

 

I'm now moving to stage 2 and fully intend to take the bastards to court. I don't really care if I win, I'll just bog the bastards down in paperword and hassle.

 

Letter 1.

 

Dear Mr xxx

 

Thanks for contacting us and I'm sorry you've been so unhappy you've felt you must complain.

 

One of my colleagues will be responsible for investigating your complaint and I've enclosed our Customer Satisfaction Leaflet, which explains our procedure fordoing this. High quality customer service is of great importance to us at Abbey and we’ll do everything we can to resolve your complaint in a timely and satisfactory manner.

 

I know it's important to you that we resolve your complaint quickly but we want to do a thorough investigation and sometimes this can take time. We’ll write to you within the next four weeks to let you know what's happening.

 

Although I don't know what the outcome will be, I do hope we’ll be able to find a. solution that you're happy with.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Antony Turbitt Manager, Banking Servicing

 

 

Letter 2.

 

Dear Mr xxx

 

Thank you for your letter of 8 April 2006.

 

I'm sorry to hear you're unhappy about the bank charges. However, as stated in the terms and conditions of the account, it's up to you to make sure there's enough money available to cover any due payments.

 

With regard to your request for a refund of charges under Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations, we don't accept that Abbey's charges are unfair. It's well known that banks make charges and Abbey's charges are in line with those of other banks. The terms and conditions of the account and the charges that apply are clear and fair and were provided to you at the time that you opened it. You freely agreed to the terms and conditions and the charges when you opened the account. You weren't under any obligation to do so and could have gone to another bank if you didn't agree to our charges. Equally, you're free to move your account to another bank at any time if you don't agree with them.

 

In any event, we don't agree that the charges are disproportionate. They are reasonable and proportionate to the administrative costs incurred by Abbey in dealing with the matter.

 

If the complaint escalates into a claim in the County Court, we'll review each case individually and if we feel that our relationship with our customer has broken down completely, we may decide to give notice to close the account under the terms and conditions.

 

We've already shown some flexibility in reducing your fees in the past and I'm therefore, unable to refund any more on this occasion, I'm sorry.

An investigation of the charges relating to your complaint has been carried out. As they've all been applied in line with our current tariff of charges and haven't arisen as a result of a proven Abbey error, no further refunds will be applied.

 

Please be assured I've carried out a full investigation for you and I hope you feel I've offered a fair response to al! of the issue's you've raised. 1'11 keep your file open for the next eight weeks and if I don't hear from you within that time, 1'11 assume that everything is resolved and will close your file.

 

If you remain dissatisfied though, the leaflet you’ll find with this letter explains your rights and how to take your complaint further with Abbey. The leaflet also explains your ultimate right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Your sincerely,

 

Jackie Hammond.

Banking Servicing.

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Real letter before action sent today, taken from the templates section and reproduced below.

I guess I now have 14 days to read through the steps for issusing the claim in the court as I don't expect Shabbey to roll over.

 

 

Letter below;

 

Abbey,

PO Box 382,

Prescot Street,

London.

E1 8RP

 

Letter before action.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account number xxxxx

 

I note your reply to my letter dated 8th. April, 2006 and your refusal to refund the unlawful fees you have levied against my account.

 

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £190.00 in charges plus £12.88 in interest, total £202.88.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice. The will be no further communication from me.

 

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you send it First Class recorded Delivery (should cost £1), then you know they have received it.

 

Remember to wait the full 14 days even if you receive an answer before going on to court action (unless by off you all your money back!!!)

 

LOULA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Shabbey have acknowledged my claim (12th. June) in the court so they now have 14 days to enter a defence. From the time it's taken so far I assume that's 14 working days, so they have until 30th. June to respond.

I'm not getting any emails from the moneyclaim.gov.uk about this - is this normal or is my junk mail filter a bit over- enthusiastic ?

Also, from reading various posts are the banks getting a bit more aggressive ? They don't seem to be rolling over at the threat of a claim in the small claims court.

Great to see some really good results on the forum though, keep hammering the bastards everyone - some of the charges people post are criminal.

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from shabbey legal department today.

 

Normal waffle about 'without prejudice', 'no admission of liability' and the like but they have paid the whole £232.88 into my shabbey account (so it says). When I know it's there I'll close the account.

 

A 100% result.

 

I realise that my claim was tiny compared to some I see on this forum, but it was worth the trouble to get it back. I really did do exactly what the advice in the FAQ says and it realy did proceed as the FAQ says - brilliant.

 

So you people persueing a claim right now - hang in there, take a deep breath and follow it through to the end - it is worth it.

 

Anybody reading this and thinking my claim isn't worth the effort - it is. £200 is a lot of money and now I have it back. More to the point - the banks' are ripping us off left, right and centre - no way is £30 justified for processing a direct debit. They also rip us off in the way they deliberately take their time processing payments into our accounts (3 days) but take them out straight away.

 

Made my weekend. Thanks to the moderators for a brilliant site, a suitable donations will be made.

 

Happy Postie......

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven't even bothered to acknowledge srvice in my case so I hope I can get as good a result. Well done you!:-) :-) :-)

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Postie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...