Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
    • Also, have you told us how much you paid for this vehicle? Are there any other expenses you have incurred – insurance, inspections et cetera? How far away from the dealership do you live?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marston & fees added to old court fine .- help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first time on the forum and I need help and don't know where else to turn.

 

I am having trouble with Marston Group Bailiffs.

 

In short I have just received a letter from my old address which was sent on 4th May this year saying I owed £220

which was an outstanding court fine of 135 plus 85 charges from marston.

 

I went to their website to pay the £220 on friday night and was told I couldn't pay it.

 

I rang Marstons yesterday morning to pay by debit card and spoke to a guy who informed the debt has now risen to 400 plus due to it being in the hands of the bailiff.

 

I was told the extra money had been added because they have had to make a visit.

 

Now as far as I am aware no bailiffs have been to my current house or my old address so how can they make the extra charge.

I am quite prepared to pay the 220 but can't afford the extra 215 for attending.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated as I am at my wits end with it now.

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you know about the court fine before you received the letter from your previous address

It looks like you did not receive the further steps notice from the court (if all correspondence has been going to old address)

 

this would mean the warrant is in your old address

 

you should file a statutory DEC with the court have a read of this thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?165753-MAGISTRATE-COURT-FINES.-Template-of-a-Statutory-Declaration.(1-Viewing)-nbsp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply hallowitch yes I knew about the fine and made 3 payments of 50 off it as arranged with the court as the woman I spoke to said the minimum I could pay was 50 a month even though I told her I couldn afford it. I know I should have got in touch with the court instead of burying my head in the sand but I am by nature a bit of an ostrich

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. I had exactly the same problem from Marston. I paid up all my fine only to be greated by a bailiff 2 weeks later to remove goods to the tune of £215. The police sided with the bailiff and I had to pay the £215 or have my goods seized then and there.

 

I don't mean to scare you but this is thier practise. The good news is it is illegal.

 

That £215 is only valid if a baliff seizes your goods. I would seriously do your homework quickly so when the bailiff arrives you are armed with a wealth of knowledge. The police mostly always side with the bailiff.

 

If you can borrow the money as I did and pay the bailiff on arrival. Then File a FORM 4 to the court that certified the bailiff for fraud by false representation.

 

That is what I am doing. Best wishes, I know it's awful x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blingbong.

 

Filing a Form 4 Complaint is a VERY SERIOUS MATTER indeed. By making such a complaint you are in effect asking the court to consider whether the bailiff is a "fit an proper" person to hold a certificate. Also, you cannnot make an allegation of fraud to a County Court. Such allegations must be made to the police and they have to consider the complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the replies. I have no chance of getting a loan and do not own anything in the house where I am at present as its my girlfriends house. My ex wife has all my stuff which even if sold would bring next to nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blingbong

 

I have to agree with Tomtubby about you making a Form 4 complaint against a scummy bailiff who has engaged in alleged Fraud by False Misrepresentation. The offence comes under the Criminal Law and, as such, can only be dealt with by a Magistrates Court or a Crown Court, not a Civil Court. You may find it is better to make a civil claim against H.M. Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) as they are 100% vicariously-liable for the actions of Marstons through the legal instrument of agency.

 

I would certainly recommend you making a formal complaint against Marstons to the OFT's Credit Fitness Team and your local Trading Standards Department. Marstons' bailiffs have been involved in a number of incidents recently, some of them serious, some of them very serious, and it appears OFT Credit Fitness Team are not happy bunnies. It is almost as if Marstons have pushed the self-destruct button.

 

Send an email to enquiries@oft.gsi.gov.uk and insert CREDIT FITNESS in the subject box. Give a clear and concise resume of your complaint. Your will need to include the following details in your complaint -

 

Company Name: Marston Group Ltd

Credit Licence No.: 333059

 

It is a good idea to print off the email and let your local Trading Standards have a copy of it. It saves them a lot of work and means they know that OFT Credit Fitness Team are also on the case. I am attaching copies of the OFT Debt Collection Guidelines and MoJ Regulations for Bailiffs to this post.

OFT Debt Collection Guidelines (2011).pdf

national-standards-enforcement-agents.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

from what i understand from your statement, you missed payments to the courts or were late or dodnt pay the agreed amount, you are in breech of an aggrement and the courts take action against you

the courts then issue a warrant of distress against you--- this is £215

bailiffs enforce such warrant-- admin fee £85

the whole amount is payable to the courts or the bailiffs

if the debt is returnt to the client, the courts, they will make a decision on what to do next

warrant of commital is the next stage up

 

their is no wrong doing so a form 4 complaint would be thrown out, and you possibly run the risk of cival action against you by the bailiff

 

hope you get this sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

and for your infomation if a warrant of distress is issued then the bailiff CAN force entry with or without your presence under the magistrates court act 2004 and the DVCV act

 

 

see bailiffadviceonline dot com magistrates courts fines

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sgt Bush,

 

The provisions you mention in your post apply to fines for criminal offences only. This is because a custodial sentence can be substituted for non-payment of such a fine by way of a Substitution Order. The forced entry does not apply to traffic fines or summary offences not carrying custodial penalties. Marstons have form for forcing entry illegally, their usual modus operandi being to assault people and lie to the police, even when people have already paid the fines in full. I am currently dealing with such a case on another consumer advice site and I can assure you that Marstons' actions are being taken very seriously by the relevant authorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am going through something similar,I have posted a new thread please help me.I shall be ever so greatful to you all.I am relying on some expert advice in this matter.

Search Marston group is harrassing me.Please help. in the search box.please reply soon before marston bully returns.Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...