Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank charge cycle I can't break


chrisde1982
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I Had £90 of bank charges due out on the 19th of this month, after some negotiation with Santander they removed £70 of those charges but they said the unauthorised bank charge of £20 stands. Now, I have gone from being weekly paid to monthly which means I am not going to receive any more pay until the 21st June. The £20 charge which went out of my bank on the £19th has taken me over my overdraft by £20.

 

I have calculated at £5 per day that I will build up £140 of charges now before I get paid again and as my charges go out on the 19th I will be well over my overdraft by £160 by the time I get paid. I have tried talking to them about this and have explained the situation with my job change but they are not having any of it. I even asked if they could increase my overdraft just enough to cover the £20 which would prevent the £140 charges at the end of June.

 

I don't know what to do, last month I got a letter from them saying I had received £700 of charges in total for 2011, I can't get out of this vicious circle. A few months ago I purchased an app for my phone which too me over my overdraft by 6p and I ended up getting a £10 charge for making the payment and then about £20 for being over my overdraft for x number of days.

 

I have cancelled all my direct debits and standing orders now to try and keep the charges down to a minimum. I know it's my own fault in a way but the only reason I am over drawn now and am going to incur these huge charges next month are because Santander have taken me over my overdraft...

 

Help or suggestions with how to deal with this would be welcome..

 

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain whats happened, explain how they have let you down (the fact that you've changed jobs) and explain what you want them to do. Have a read of No.14 in my signature. In a nutshell, BCOB's means that your bank should not treat you 'unfairly'.

 

Send it to:-

 

Ana Patricia Botin, Chief Executive

ceo@santander.co.uk

 

Some tips:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1242161/How--write-letter-complaint.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had exactly the same thing happen to me. On my two accounts with Santander, one which had a zero balance and was dormant for 6 months, have over the last 8 months attracted over £2000 worth of bank charges, most of it accrued as Santander would not instruct on my written intructings to stop paying direct debits as I'd changed my bank and moved my income to another bank.

I wrote a letter to Ana Botin, recorded delivery in September 2011 and have not had a reply, except for monthly statements mounting up.

I took it to the Ombudsman who ruled that I had no intention of ever moving my bank account and that Santander are fully in their rights not to respond to writen intrcutions as thats not their preferred means of correspondence, even though it's my preferred method.

I sent thempost dated cheques to pay off this massive debt, which Santander has refused to accept as they want the full amount in one lump sum,which I canot afford to do.

Santander are a law unto themselves and no financial watchdog is going to rule against them.

I wish you luck in getting a response from Ana, don't hold your breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am also in the process of writing a letter to Santander under BCOBS. At the moment I’m addressing 11 issues.

Quick overlay:2004 Opened a current account, throughout getting heavily charged in 2008 I walked into the bank who advised 'let’s start fresh, Close this down and open a new account' - (to which I now know was for commission/targets)

No letters received until 6/7 months later "DEFAULT NOTICE" there was £346 accrued in charges and going from that, they DEFAULTED me.

Took to the moon and back to resolve, they removed the charges... But not the default!4 years later, slightly strapped for cash and I go over 6p and get charged £50 to which leads to an on-going cycle of their charges taking me overdrawn every month for over a year (I could not stop as my budget was exactly my wages)

My card was then stolen. Was advised over the phone to go into the branch. The BANK MANAGER then ordered me a replacement 'CASH CARD?"!" so now, so any payments I had to make online/phone - I couldn’t do. So I March back into the branch "no apologies" and another card is ordered. Following week, Another CASH CARD is delivered!!!

I then go back (5th visit as 2 times I needed Cash / 3rd time about card) and again no apology and they order a new Visa Electron? (was debit) but to their surprise a Visa debit was ordered 4 days previously (even though I never called/visited the branch). So the recently ordered card would now replace the one currently in the post!! (Confusing I know)!And this is only 20% of the trouble with Santander, If my credit rating wasn’t so poor (thanks to them) I would jump ship... but no other banks will even take me on :(#RANTOVER

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...