Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This must be part of the new tactic from Evri.  They know they are going to lose. They take it to the wire and then don't bother to turn up in order to save themselves costs and of course they don't give a damn about the cost to the British taxpayer and the extra court delays they cause. This is a nasty dishonest company – but rather in line with all of the parcel delivery industry which knows that their insurance requirements are unlawful. They know that their prohibited items are for the most part unfair terms. They know for the most part that a "safe place" is exactly what it means – are not left on somebody's doorstep in full view. They know that obtaining a signature means that they have to show the signature not simply claim that they received a signature. They are making huge profits especially from their unlawful and unenforceable insurance requirement. Although this is less valuable than the PPI scandal, in terms of the number of people who are affected nationwide, PPI pales into insignificance. I hope the paralegals working for Evri are proud of themselves and they tell their families what they have done during the day when they go home.
    • Your PCN does not comply with the Protection of freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9[2][a] (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The only time on the PCN is 17.14. That is only  a time for there to be a period there would have to be a start and and end time mentioned. of course they do show the ANPR arrival and departures  times but that is not the parking period and their times are on the photographs not on the PCN. They also failed to comply with S.9[2][f] as they omitted to say that they could only pursue the keeper if they complied with the Act. That means that they can only pursue the driver as the keeper cannot be held liable for the charge. As they do not know who was driving and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person they will struggle to win. Especially as so many people are able to legally drive your car and you haven't appealed giving them no indication therefore of who was driving. Small nitpicking point-the date of Infringement was 22/04/2024. They appear to be saying that they can charge an extra amount [up to £70 ] if they have to use a debt collector. You do not have a contract with a debt collector so they cannot add that cost. You paid for four hours so it can only be the 15 minutes they are complaining about. You are entitled to a ten minute minimum grace period at the end of the parking period which would be easier to explain if the car park had been bigger. However if you allow for two minutes to park and two minutes to leave that gives you one minute to account for. Things like being held on the way out by cars in front waiting to get on to Northgate or even your own car being held up trying to get on to Northgate at a busy time. then other considerations like having to stop to allow pedestrians to walk in front of you or being held up by another car doing a u turn in front of your car. you would have to check with the driver and see if they could account for an extra one minute things like a disabled passenger or having to strap in a child . I am not advocating lying since that could lead to serious problems [like jail time] but there can be an awful lot of minor things that can cause a hold up of a minute even the engine not starting straight away or another car being badly parked as examples. Sadly you cannot include the 5 minute Consideration period as both IPC and BPA fail to comply with the convention that you can include that time with the Grace period.  
    • Defence struck out not case struck out...you have judgment  Well done topic title updated Regard's Please consider making a donation if not already to support us to help others.   Andy.   .
    • Hi all, I wanted to update you and thank you all for your help. I am delighted announce that after the case was struck out due to no response from Evri, judgement was issued after I submitted the forms and I was just about to take it to warrant.  today I received an email from the claims department requesting my bank details to make payment for my full award. The process has been long since the initial proceedings  in January i must say your help and guidance has been greatly appreciated.  
    • Quote of the century "Farage pops up when the country’s at a low ebb; like a kind of political herpes" - Frankie Boyle Updates
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My local Garage and Car ... what options?


moll 61
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

In May 2010 my wife bought a car (Vaxhaull Zafira) from a local garage.

After 3 days the car broke down about 5 miles from home. Luckily garage not to far away so it was able to make it there, she was told they had checked it out and could find nothing wrong but it was ok. After having it for a while it became apparent that the car used alot of oil, she had the oil filter replaced but soon started having problems with it using alot more oil, just had to keep checking it. The garage said it was just a car that used alot of oil.

The car then broke down in July last year and had to be towed back to the garage. It took two weeks to repair it, costing £1130. After having the car back for acouple of days (if that) blue smoke started coming out of the engine, took the car back to garage who checked it over and she was told that in hind sight they should have put a new engine in, best they could offer was to try give it a quick fix and she would be best taking it to auction which they did for her (maybe?), however once the car did manage to make it to the auctions it was not sold and once engine turned over car billowed out the thick smoke.

 

She was then told that a new engine would be best thing, but they just wanted to check afew other things out..... After they had had car sometime she got a call to say yet again, a new engine needed, so just she said to do what was necessary. After them having car for some time another call made about it needing a new engine cost would be around £1000but he would check prices of engines, yet again waited, so made another call to be told they had done nothing was waiting to hear from her, but she thought waiting to be told a more specific price. Was told that it would cost around £1000, (without checking prices etc) and it wouldn't sell for much, so one of the mechanics is looking for a 7 seater and would give her about £300(Convenient) wouldn't get that much after paying out for the new engine, should she be paying for this as handed over £1000 to get car repaired, also spoken to independant mechanic who sais engines can be picked up for £200 and wouldn't cost that much to fit....

They have had her car since last August, what options does she have

 

Many Thanks Moll

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I think you have not been pro active enough here with the seller. When you were told that 'the car uses a lot of oil', my response would of been there and then; 'well you better sort it out then because it shouldn't use a lot of oil'.

 

The problem you have here is the time scale. Within the first 6 months of ownership, the seller has to prove that the fault wasn't present at the point of sale which basically means that any fault (ex wear and tear) would most likely down to the seller to rectify. Clearly from what you say, he has fobbed you off and you are now well passed that time window and so far £1130 out of pocket. Sounds to me like he knew there was a serious problem and managed to fobb you off long enough to be able to charge you for the work which he possibly knew needed doing when he sold it.

 

But all is not lost. You can use the SOGA to bring a claim for up to 6 years from the date of purchase BUT you will need to build a strong case using evidence in the form of documentation relating to the problem from the first time the problem became evident. So do you have any paper work (invoices etc) relating to the breakdown shortly after purchase? Or the invoice from the repair last July? In a nut shell, if you take this to court, you will need to convince the judge that the problem was there around the time you bought the car.

 

If it was me, I would be arranging to have a quiet word with the seller and say that you are not happy with the purchase as you believe the oil issue that it had was just the tip of an expensive ice berg and as such, you hold him at the very least, partially responsible. To avoid taking legal advice, what would he be prepared to do about it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much Sailor, I agree the oil problem should have been challenged, my wife would not let me deal with this as i can be to "vocal", still have bill for the work done in July, the garage must have documentary evidence of the original oil prob surely? can we get hold of it? Will check out the SOGA, again thanks very much will let you know how we get on

 

Moll

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like valve stem oil seals, it was common on vauxhall vectras too

 

They can be replaced without removing the head or valves with a special tool

 

New valve stem oil seals fitted should be £200-£250

 

Fitting another engine could be more trouble unless you know its from a low mileage,well maintained,regularly serviced car

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found out bill.

 

work carried out; Investigate non starting/noise from engine. Remove cylinder head and trip down re-assemble with parts as listed. bleed systems and test.

followig parts purchased

 

timing belt, water pump, anti freeze, consumables, tyre/valve/balance/disposal, head gaskett set, head bolt set. valve grind, inlet valve, exhaust valve, cylinder head/valve seat overh.

 

labour £325. parts £616.67. VAT 188.33 total 1,130

 

3 days after this it broke down

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its not the top end - burning a lot of oil is either very high mileage or lack of oil changes.

 

Contact the previous owner and check the mileage.

 

'this model burns a lot of oil' suddenly sounds like a potential cover up worth checking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its not the top end - burning a lot of oil is either very high mileage or lack of oil changes.

 

Contact the previous owner and check the mileage.

 

'this model burns a lot of oil' suddenly sounds like a potential cover up worth checking.

 

My thoughts exactly.

 

OP I suggest you have that quiet word as I suggested in post 4. If we get no where with that we start writing letters.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...