Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • read and use the online sites in UPLOAD dx  
    • Hi  Any free apps to download to pdf from android  H
    • Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
    • Probably about 7 days or so. Do you have her email address?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC/MBNA response to CPUTR letter.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Got an unusual letter from DLC and hoping somebody can help me understand it. This was in response to my CPUTR request. They are threatening court action and had previously sent me a very dodgy looking "copy" of my agreement.

 

Now they are saying there is no signed agreement as it was done online. It was a long time ago but I'm sure I must have signed something. Does this mean they don't have the original agreement and are trying to mislead me?

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

We do not currently hold an original agreement however we have obtained a copy from the original lender which we enclose for your reference. Please note the agreement is an online agreement therefore will not contain a signature.

 

The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 came into effect on December 31 2004 and changed the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to facilitate the completion on regulated agreements online. Documents can now be transmitted and signed electronically.

 

The process is that after going through an online application process which includes ID and CRA checks, the customer is presented with the agreement and terms and conditions in full. The customer has to click to accept these, and the agreement and terms and conditions are transmitted in a form which allows the customer to print or save them and the customer is encouraged to do so.

 

The customer signs the agreement using an electronic signature – an “x” is typed into the signature box. By virtue of the Electronic Communications Act 2000, an electronic signature is admissible in relation to any question as to the authenticity of an electronic communication ( ie the agreement). For these purposes “authentication” is a reference to whether the agreement is intended to have legal effect. The wording in the CCA signature box clearly indicates that this is the case.

 

An electronic signature is defined by section 7(2) as “so much of anything in electronic form as-

 

a)*** is incorporated into or logically associated with any electronic communication or electronic data; and

 

b)*** purports to be so incorporated or associated for the purpose of being used in establishing the authenticity of the communication or data, the integrity of the communication or data, or both”*

 

Section 15(2) deals with the meaning of authentication.

 

In respect of your s78 request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, please find enclosed a copy of your original agreement, along with current terms and conditions and those applicable at the time of inception.

*

This now completes our obligations under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and satisfies your s78 request.

 

We believe the agreement to be fully enforceable and we will therefore continue to pursue you for repayment of the account balance.

 

*

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...