Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help Please!! Tenant spent all the backpaid rent money?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Where do i stand legally with this issue? The tenant has spent £527 of backdated rent money from the council and ive asked them to leave my property ASAP and she has phoned the police and the police have said i have to give her a months notice but she didnt pay any bond or rent up front? Any help please thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If this is backdated money from the council housing benefit dept to pay the landlord rent and they have spent this you are entitled as the landlord to in form the council housing benefit dept of this.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the tenant owe more than 2 months rent or under 2 months?

If more than 2 months then you use a section 8 to get them out, can take a couple of months though.

 

If you have a break clause in the tenancy agreement then use that but will still take a month as you should give them a months notice but even then they do not have to leave till you take it to court which would be under a section 21.

 

Getting tenants out is a lot harder than getting them in in the first place,

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first six months, you usually can't break a contract unless you have legal ground to do so. You can't just force someone out of the property and without notice at any time. It is highly illegal. I would suggest getting proper legal advice as it is difficult to say what you can and can't do given the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if the tenant is not paying rent then they have broken the agreement from there side which then means you can give them 1 months notice and if they refuse to leave after that you issue a section 21 or if they owe more than 2 months full rent its a section 8..

 

Either way, its court then a waiting game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if the tenant is not paying rent then they have broken the agreement from there side which then means you can give them 1 months notice and if they refuse to leave after that you issue a section 21 or if they owe more than 2 months full rent its a section 8..

 

Either way, its court then a waiting game.

 

Which would constitute a legal ground to remove them. However, the OP cannot forcibly remove the tenant, it has to go to a court first. Hence I would suggest she get advice on which steps she has to use to remove the tenant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one has said to remove them by force, all i've said is the steps that need to be taken to get them out if thats what they want to do and for both its a case of going to court which i have made clear.

 

And the reason people ask for help on here is to get advice which is what i am doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If T is not paying rent from HB received or is in arrears, then first step would be notify local HB dept and require them to pay future HB payments direct to LL, that should curtail Ts avail income. s8 g10 or 11 can be used to obtain discretionary repo order if some rent is owed. Only g8 (2 months rent owed) is mandatory ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...