Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good idea to disappear for 2 mths without reading up. 1000's of threads here to read. dx  
    • I don't think they even deserve a reply...    We do have a solid case don't we?? Even though mum corgot the pop that time??
    • To start, my address both on my logbook and with the DVLA are correct.  The first I knew of the bus lane fine was when a woman on another floor in my building posted a photo of a letter addressed to me but with her address on it, on the building's facebook group. I obviously recognised my name so contacted her. She said she'd been receiving these letters for me for months but only asked in the group if anyone knew me when the bailiffs were at her door.  I contacted the debt collection agency and Manchester Council and was told to appeal. So I did and explained what happened said I was more than willing to pay the original fine but its now at over £400 and I would have paid straight away if the letters had gone to the correct address. Months have passed and I have just been told (with no reason) that my appeal was unsuccessful and I need to pay the full amount.  Any help would be appreciated! It just seems so unfair!
    • Exactly right Bank!  I had an email this morning from HM Courts and Tribunals Service Civil Money Claims: Dear Mr xxxx Claim number: 527MCxxx Parcel2Go.com has been given an extra 14 days to respond to your claim. They need to respond to your claim before 4pm on 4 June 2024.  Anyone would think you've been through this before!
    • OK, understood. The second decision to make, given PE are wobbling, would be whether to reply to them (well after 8 May to show you're not scared of them), ridicule their offer which is no offer at all, and ask them to make a serious attempt to settle.  You never know, they might offer a few quid as an out-of.court settlement and it might save your mum having to do court. Just an idea.  Something to consider.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot & Santander Credit Card 'debt'


1988
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

for the past two weeks i have been bombarded with telephone calls from CC company at first i would ignore them and add number to blacklist,but they seam to call from another number

 

have spoken to them for past four days refusing to go through security as they failed my security questions!!

 

i have told them to put it in writing and i look forwards to hearing from them.

 

They told me they cant stop the calls despite me asking them not to phone me.

 

I told them the level of calls revived from them is harassment they have said it is not as it is within my contract for them to phone me.

 

What would be the best way forwards on this.:frusty:

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are these fools?

 

Send them this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter get "Proof of posting" from the PO counter, keep a diary of events as to their continued criminal offence of harassment with a view of reporting them to the Police.

Get in touch with your phone provider and go through their malicious calls procedure, also report them to Ofcom for abusing the telephone network.

 

If they ring in future laugh and hang up, DO NOT even entertain them on the phone.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for the past two weeks i have been bombarded with telephone calls from CC company at first i would ignore them and add number to blacklist,but they seam to call from another number

 

have spoken to them for past four days refusing to go through security as they failed my security questions!!

 

i have told them to put it in writing and i look forwards to hearing from them.

 

They told me they cant stop the calls despite me asking them not to phone me.

 

I told them the level of calls revived from them is harassment they have said it is not as it is within my contract for them to phone me.

 

What would be the best way forwards on this.:frusty:

 

Thanks in advance

 

Just ignore them. There is no legal obligation to talk to them on the phone..

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a telephone harassment letter in the Cag Library

you can send.

 

The OFT Guidance 2003/2011 says in section 33(j) & (k)

It is unfair to ignore or disregard debtors' reasonable requests

in respect of when, where and how to contact them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a credit card with santandere but when they phone they are phoning on behalf of santandere

 

I believe Santander collections is westcot credit as if i make a payment to them on my card it shows up as westcot credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a credit card with santandere but when they phone they are phoning on behalf of santandere

 

I believe Santander collections is westcot credit as if i make a payment to them on my card it shows up as westcot credit

Again this is a breach of OFT Guidance Section 3.3 © Those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who they work for,

what their roll is, and the purpose of the contact.

Did you have a Notice of Assignment stating that the debt had been passed to westcott?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help

 

 

brigadier

 

it has not been passed to westcott still with santander

 

I also have a mortgage with santander which has been passed to collections and recovery's from time to time and that too is westcott collecting payment for santander as bank statement say westcott credit.

I am sure not many people are aware that Santander not only cant take card payments but also pass on your details

 

 

I have missed a few payments on CC that is why they keep phoning cant think what debt collector they will pass it on to if i don't bring account back to order!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's odd Westcott Credit Services is a debt collection agency!!

They are still out of order with the calls.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's odd Westcott Credit Services is a debt collection agency!!

They are still out of order with the calls.

 

Amex used to get RMA to phone anyone running behind on their debts even just a payment or two behind and not defaulted.

 

Get that letter sent, they can deny / lose telephone conversations asking for contact only by post... its much more difficult if you've sent notification by recorded delivery/signed for :)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it has not been passed to westcott still with santander

I also have a mortgage with santander which has been passed to collections and recovery's from time to time and that too is westcott collecting payment for santander as bank statement say westcott credit.

I am sure not many people are aware that Santander not only cant take card payments but also pass on your details

I have missed a few payments on CC that is why they keep phoning cant think what debt collector they will pass it on to if i don't bring account back to order!!

 

 

 

So you owe santander money, for you Mortgage yes? AND for a Credit card yes?

 

It does not matter WHO phone you regarding any of this, YOU DO NOT deal with financial matters over the phone. You MUST keep everything in writing.

 

Your mortgage IS A PRIORITY, credit cards and unsecured debts ARE NOT! (council tax, court fines are)

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them. There is no legal obligation to talk to them on the phone..

Tell them to stop and remove your number from their records or you will report them for malicious calls, abuse of how they hold your data, to the police for harassment and then to your phone provider ask them to monitor the calls and block their number. It may be worth for a couple of months to pay for a small fee to be able to block the calls yourself and have them deleted. You could also filter the calls, by having an answer machine pick up all calls, put your phone on silent ring, so you are not disturbed and delete all messages from these and other unwanted pests. No-one has the right to hold your phone number or call you at home if you tell them not to. There are other things that your phone provider can do but they will be able to tell you and it varies with each one. Another thing to do is to register with a couple of on line agencies that protect you from these calls. You can also have yourself removed from the phone book and reject all none registered numbers and silent callers. You can have them prosecuted for nuisance calls and you do not have to deal with them. Another trick I found worked was to answer and put the phone off the hook with them still attached to it for a couple of hours: they did not phone again, or put the automated message on for a day or two that does not accept any calls. They will give up when they cannot get hold of you at all. Send them a registered letter telling them not to contact you again and that you will prosecute them if they do not leave you alone. They will soon go away.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...