Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help With Marston Group - warrant for tv licence fine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

I have two young children (5 and 1).

 

I split up with the kids dad just before christmas so now Im a single mum.

 

I have had a pretty tough few months and was just about sorted when I received a letter from Marston Group.

 

It was originally a court fine that had now been passed to them.

I called them last Monday to arrange payment and was told that someone would ring me back to arrange a longer term payment plan but I heard nothing until this morning

 

I had a letter from a man on my doorstep saying that if I didnt pay immediately he would be back 'one evening this week' to remove goods for sale at public auction.

 

There is no way I can get this money, I dont work so cant even afford to pay a lump sum.

I just want to know that if he gains entry to my house (he turned up as I was leaving to take my son to school so he knows when I come in and out),

can he take any of my childrens toys (I know hes not supposed to but I have been told these are only guidelines)

and what will happen when he realises I dont have goods to the value of the debt and fees?

 

I spoke to the court earlier and was told that if there werent enough goods to cover the full amount it would get passed back to the court

and then they would take amounts from my benefit.

 

Im just worried that he will take my things anyway even though they wont come to the full amount and he will take my childrens toys to bump it up.

 

Any help would be very much appreciated.

 

Oh and it would be worth mentioning that I called them this morning and it doesnt matter that they didnt even try to call me.

 

All I was told was 'either pay in full or wait for the bailiffs' then they hung the phone up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rgoff,

 

so, if I understand your post correctly, you're a single Mum with two young kids getting by on benefits?

What benefits do you get?

Income Support possibly?

 

Any way up, if you're unemployed and a single parent then that puts you within the vulnerable category.

 

I'm surprised that the court is recommending attachment to benefits only after the bailiff has decided that there is nowt worth selling.

 

The bailiff should, as a matter of course, refer this back to the court.

 

I would suggest you write to the court detailing what benefits you are on,

the fact you are a single parent and are not currently working.

 

Request that the case is taken back for a means test and payment to be deducted from benefits.

 

Copy letter to the bailiff...

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to the man at the court, as it has been passed to marston there is nothing they can do unless it gets passed back to them. Thankyou for your help. Will write the letter first thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what the fine for?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

 

the elderly;

people with a disability;

the seriously ill;

the recently bereaved;

single parent families;

pregnant women;

unemployed people; and,

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

 

Above are the two elements that cover you in the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. Both the court and the bailiff will be aware of them. Presuming - and you haven't mentioned what benefits you recieve - your benefits are attachable, then you need to request a means test etc as mentioned above. The 'it's gone to the bailiffs, nowt i can do' excuse is a default setting ...

Edited by RaeUK
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope this can be sorted out quickly by people who have more knowledge than me but

point no. 1.

if anybody goes near your kids toys they are in serious trouble.

point no.2 you are classed as vulnerable so the "man" should back off quick style.

point no. 3 you can't get blood out of a stone.

 

And from a personal viewpoint, don't talk to Marstons, if this is council tax deal direct with the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im just worried that he will take my things anyway even though they wont come to the full amount and he will take my childrens toys to bump it up.

 

Any help would be very much appreciated.

 

Oh and it would be worth mentioning that I called them this morning and it doesnt matter that they didnt even try to call me.

Don't let him in. If it's a baliff all he's interested in is bumping up his fees.

I Repeat, DON'T LET HIM IN-

At this point we don't know what the "fine" is for but personally I still maintain that you are in a vulnereable situation with 2 young children and everybody should back off to give you a chance to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was originally a tv licence fine as I defaulted on payments. My own stupid fault. So to clarify, dont let him in and write to the council asking for the case to be taken back and a means test carried out. thanks for your help. I dont care about my stuff really, just my kids toys and how they would feel to find tv and stuff gone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am very tempted just to let them in and get it over with. I really dont see that I have goods to the value of £550 so will they send it back to the court or will they just levy what I do have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya. I have been given notice that a bailiff from Marston group will be calling at my house one evening this week to remove goods for public auction.

 

I have been told by several organisations to not answer the door to them.

 

There are just a couple of points I need cleared up.

 

Can they physically force entry to my home if they believe I am there?

 

I have two young children and if he calls in the evening as he said, its a good possibility he will hear them.

 

Secondly I was told that to gain entry they have to go back to court and get a warrant and they have to notify me of this after they have it,

when they will be coming and they have to turn up with the police.

 

I was told that they very rarely do this but is it different as the original debt is for a court fine?

 

i was told he had power of locksmith so do they still need a separate warrant to gain entry?

Or is it included on the warrant they already have?

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'd do better to keep to one thread on this issue

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tv licence fine

 

threads merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I knew about it. Im one of the stupid people you hear about who bury their heads in the sand and end up owing a lot of money to people. I have sorted everything else out except this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to what ive read on here and a piece of paper I found from the court he can use reasonable force to enter my home if he believes I am here. Does this mean he can break in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

rgoff, can I just refer you to my earlier posts? They do advise you what the correct procedure is. It's not difficult, just a couple of simple letters. There would then be no bailiff to worry about and no extra fees. Just the fine, deducted from your benefits at about £3.50 per week. Provided, of course, that you recieve the right benefits. You've still forgotten to mention which they are ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
hiya. I have been given notice that a bailiff from Marston group will be calling at my house one evening this week to remove goods for public auction.

 

I have been told by several organisations to not answer the door to them.

 

There are just a couple of points I need cleared up.

 

Can they physically force entry to my home if they believe I am there?

 

I have two young children and if he calls in the evening as he said, its a good possibility he will hear them.

 

Secondly I was told that to gain entry they have to go back to court and get a warrant and they have to notify me of this after they have it,

when they will be coming and they have to turn up with the police.

 

I was told that they very rarely do this but is it different as the original debt is for a court fine?

 

i was told he had power of locksmith so do they still need a separate warrant to gain entry?

Or is it included on the warrant they already have?

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

thankyou

 

I am in the same boat. My daughter who used to live with me received a court fine for a driving offence and was paying a monthly payment but since coming out of work and is now on unemployment reduced payments by half. This ended up with it being passed to Marston Group who are NOT willing to arrange payment plan and want payment in full or enter my property even though she is no longer at my address. She asked on many occasions to arrange payment plan to no avail. I will not be letting them into my property even though they say they have warrant to enter. I have spoken to the courts who say nothing they can do out of their hands. Well who the hell is there to help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same boat. My daughter who used to live with me received a court fine for a driving offence and was paying a monthly payment but since coming out of work and is now on unemployment reduced payments by half. This ended up with it being passed to Marston Group who are NOT willing to arrange payment plan and want payment in full or enter my property even though she is no longer at my address. She asked on many occasions to arrange payment plan to no avail. I will not be letting them into my property even though they say they have warrant to enter. I have spoken to the courts who say nothing they can do out of their hands. Well who the hell is there to help?

 

 

 

Bump??????

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same boat. My daughter who used to live with me received a court fine for a driving offence and was paying a monthly payment but since coming out of work and is now on unemployment reduced payments by half. This ended up with it being passed to Marston Group who are NOT willing to arrange payment plan and want payment in full or enter my property even though she is no longer at my address. She asked on many occasions to arrange payment plan to no avail. I will not be letting them into my property even though they say they have warrant to enter. I have spoken to the courts who say nothing they can do out of their hands. Well who the hell is there to help?

 

May I suggest you start your own thread for a better targetted response, click the link below for this

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm dealing with cases involving Marstons on another consumer forum. This company has a history of making threats and using violence the law does not permit them to use. Driving offences, unless they carry a custodial sentence, are not criminal offences and, therefore, does not confer the same powers on a certificated bailiff than would be conferred on a Civilian Enforcement Officer (CEO) employed directly by H.M. Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS). Equally, it is not a criminal offence to forget to pay your TV Licence.

 

I will deal with both rgoff's posts first.

 

You need to contact the Court Manager at the court that imposed the fine as soon as possible and find out what authority Marstons have been given by the court. If my gut-feeling is correct, Marstons have sent you one of their threat-o-gram cards or letters which are potentially illegal under Section 1, Malicious Communications Act 1988. If the court have not given them authority to force entry, DO NOT open the door to them. As for their threats to break in, they cannot do this without a sealed court order signed by a judge. This is why I am urging you to contact the court that imposed the fine.

 

I will now deal with d.robinson's posts.

 

Traffic fines, other than those carrying custodial sentences, are not criminal offences and, therefore, there is no power of forced entry unless a sealed court order signed by a judge has been issued to authorise forced entry. If you daughter is no longer living with you, the bailiffs cannot enter and remove any property belonging to a third party. The court is spinning you a yarn and you should ask to speak to the Court Manager. HMCTS is 100% vicariously-liable for the actions of certificated bailiff companies they employ to collect fines. Whatever you do, DO NOT let these scumbags into your home.

 

On the other consumer forum I am with, we are developing a strategy to deal with certificated bailiff firms, like Marstons, that does not involve the potentially-risky Form 4 complaint procedure. It has been found that bailiff companies tendering for government and local authority contracts have to hold an OFT Category F Debt Collection Licence as a condition of tender. Most bailiff companies have such a licence to enable them to collect other types of debts besides NNDR, CT, PCNs and court fines. From conversations I had with the OFT's Credit Licensing Department last week, it is possible to make a complaint against a bailiff company holding a Category F Licence as the OFT will consider whether it brings the bailiff company's fitness to hold a licence into question and revoke or refuse renewal of their licence. Such complaints are dealt with by the OFT's Credit Fitness Team. The loss of a Category F Licence to a company like Marstons would be serious as this would put any government and local authority contracts in jeopardy and prevent them from collecting other types of debts covered by the licence. The worse case scenario is that a bailiff company could be closed down.

 

If any caggers would like further details about the strategy, please post on this thread or PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marston Group are telling me that because it is a punishment from the court they have a warrant to enter my address, is this right? so your advice is to keep ringing the court and see if they can take the debt back?

Edited by d.robinson
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...