Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So if I've understood correctly, you had a meeting with a company who employ PPM to manage their car park, but PPM gave you a ticket and the company refuse to get it cancelled.  Eh???!!! You are being somewhat secretive with the details and it would help us to give correct advice if you would be crystal clear about the story.  Who did you have the meeting with?  What is their address?  Why do you think it was them who called in PPM?  Were you informed about the matter of the permit by this company?  Etc.
    • What a disgraceful shirking of responsibility.  Par for the course though I'm afraid with Iceland. You could get nasty and send them a version of the below (you know the local area so change what needs to be changed). Unfortunately the people who are replying are having to comply with the company policy which is being foisted on them - which is not to cancel tickets. But you might as well send the mail and try.   Dear Cissy, thank you for today's mail. Of course you are "able" to cancel the charge, you simply contact Excel and tell them to cancel the charge. I will wait for exactly 24 hours and then contact the local newspaper XXXXX and the local radio station XXXXX about Iceland's disgraceful disability discrimination.  Nothing much happens in Gravesend so I'm sure both will be happy to do a piece which will generate terrible publicity for your store and drive away customers, which is exactly what you deserve. Yours, XXXXX 
    • You are absolutely right to be cautious. It would be helpful if you will be prepared to send me a private message containing details of the outlet and the address et cetera. It might help me to get things more into perspective. So I understand that you had a business selling your husband's photographs. You were unable to continue your direct involvement and so you made an arrangement with a manager who you trusted to carry on the business for you while you were recovering elsewhere in the country. Is this correct? This manager has possession of all the files of your husband's photographs. Is this correct? Do you have any copies of the files? You made a reference to having a Co-op. Does that mean that you are running a Co-op supermarket or groceries outlet? I don't quite understand here. In terms of the possibility of continuing the arrangement with this manager – my own view is that you need to bring the arrangement to an end and I don't see how you could trust them. As far as I can see you are asking about two issues. Making sure that the files in the manager's position are destroyed so that you regain control of the photographs. Obtaining some damages for the loss of revenue. How many photographs do you believe are in his possession? What you estimate is your loss of revenue so far – probably calculated on your average revenue over, say, the five years before you stopped your involvement in the business? You are talking here not only about a breach of contract. You are talking also about breach of copyright and frankly you're also talking about deliberate copyright infringement – which is a criminal offence. Also fraud. Additionally, if you begin the dispute with this person, I would say that they will probably leave immediately. Have you got somebody else to run the business or would that be the moment that the whole thing collapses? If it is the latter, then this is something else that you need to prepare – somebody to take over as seamlessly as possible   Also, do you know the address of this person – and do they own their own home or any other assets?  
    • Just as i thought (from above post) : i just hope this is not the normal customer service that say they cant do anything and that you have to appeal to excel parking 🙄 this is the response my friend has received today - totally ignoring the subject which was: 'victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents' does anyone have any ideas to reply with please?     Thank you for your response.   I would like to apologise for the error in the previous email; our CEO, Tarsem Dhaliwal had received your email and tasked ourselves in the Executive Resolution Team with looking into this.   We have raised this with our internal property department who have more information on parking charges and any appeals, we can see that you had appealed the PCN with excel which was rejected, you then appealed the PCN with IAS which was also rejected.   Because of this, we would not be able to cancel or refund the charge.    I understand this may not be the outcome you had hoped for, I am sorry for any inconvenience caused.   Kind regards, Cissy
    • Officials at the Federal Reserve are expected to hold off on any interest rate cuts this month.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OK here we go! Wavelab vs LloydsTSB


wavelab
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Finally got the ball rolling a couple of weeks ago by sending the Subject Data Request with the required cheque for 10 Pounds using Royal Mail’s recorded delivery.

 

Having not heard anything, this week I made a few phone calls by looking up the postcode of the listed Data Controller’s Office, (then under Tools & Resources) using yell.co.uk to get a phone number; asking each person I spoke to for the Data Controller’s Office (as I seemed to go though to lloyds insurance by calling the number listed on yell).

 

Eventually got routed through to the Community Banking Compliance Office and a chap hunted down my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), told me when it was received by lloyds and from when my 40 days for compliance started!

 

Bit of a maze of call redirections, but got there in the end. Looks like the 40 days are up at he end of October.

 

I’ll keep you posted.

 

wavelab:D

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wavelab, welcome to the Lloyds forum:)

 

I would'nt take anything that Lloyds say over the phone as gospel. Half of them are just imcompetant and the other half are deliberately obstructive if they realise you intend to claim back your charges. It would still be worth sending them a reminder in writing, to the same address as you sent the SAR. Wait untill it gets to about 2 weeks before the deadline and send them either one of the DPA non-compliance letters from the templates library, or this one if you prefur - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/25932-garyh-hsbc-data-protection.html#post229640.

 

Good luck,

 

Gary

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice and link to non-compliance letter.:)

 

A reminder is in the post.

 

 

Many thanks and hope all goes well with the move!

 

wavelab

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

This is where I'm at.

 

I eventually received my data in accordance with the act back on the 16th Oct. I received Statements, Statement Entries and Customer Notes, a portion of each from the six year period I had requested was missing.

 

2 days later I received the outstanding statements, but only after a quick call to the Copy Statement Unit in Birmingham on the number provided (0845 300 4431). After collecting the package from the Post Office, (as post arrived after I had left for work) I noticed that the package had been opened, so I photographed the package, along with the wrapper that the Royal Mail had wrapped the remains of the envelope up in, offering their sincere apologies about the damage that had occurred. The paperwork contained inside was complete.

 

So I went through statements with a highlighter (yellow) and picked up all charges described on statements as O/DRAFT EXCESS FEE, Unpaid S/O and UNPAID D/D – entering them onto a blank excel sheet as I went. The older statements had these items labelled as UNAUTH'D BORR. FEE, CHARGE ADVISED and FEE-UNPAID ITEMS. These charges ranged from £10 to a whopping £80.

 

At this point I have a couple of questions if anyone has a moment.

 

1. What would be a good course of action here - as my details are now out there!!

 

2. Should I calculate my figures going back six years from today’s date, or can I go back to say Jan 2000? (a nice round figure)

 

Many thanks to anyone who has time to answer these wee questions.

 

Wavelab

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nic,

 

I meant to put O/DRAFT EXCESS FEE not O/DRAFT INTEREST!

 

I was wondering weather I should be claiming for exactly six years or go all the way (an extra 9 months) back to JAN 2000?

 

Thanks

Wavelab

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have received statements and calculated my claim amount. I was just wondering whether or not I should be calculating my charges for exactly 6 years to the day, or if I could go back as far as Jan 2000?

 

Thanks

 

Wavelab:)

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be exactly six years. Some people are trying to claim back charges and ignoring the six year limit. It's up to you but staying within 6 years has had a 100% success rate so far.

HSBC

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3078

24th October - LBA

7th November - Claim filed

11th November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Defence filed

16th December 2006 - Offered full amount but no default removal. Rejection letter sent.

 

Halifax

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3427

24th October - LBA

3rd November - Offered £913

3rd November - Accepted as partial payment

7th November - Claim issued

21st November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Offered full amount but no late payment removal

4th January - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

 

A & L

19th October - Prelim for £540

26th October - Offered £358

2nd November - Accepted as partial payment and LBA

27th November - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it, thanks again livelylad & alexifa.

 

I'm going to take it back to Jan2000, about £250 difference. Request for Repayment of Charges in post tomorrow.

 

Cheers guys.:D

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wavelab,

 

With regard to the 6 year limit, go back 6 years from the date you first informed them you were aware the charges were unlawful or that you intended to claim them back. This will be the date of your Subject access request. Any charges prior to that date are subject to the statute of limitation. There are good arguments to say that the statute of limitation should not apply due to the banks deliberate concealment of the nature of their charges, but you would need to understand the issues first, which will mean a bit more research. That said, as its only a reletively small amount and only a couple of months, chances are they will not even notice. If they did though, it could mean a delay and you would then have to either argue that the statute of limitation is negated (as above), or just drop the post 6 year charges from your claim

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

I've Finally got around to updating my progress. Sorry about the delay!

 

28.11.06 Sent Prelim letter and summary of charges for £1300 (Recorded Delivery)

 

05.12.06 Called Royal Mail as Prelim letter still not signed for. Looks like this one may have been lost, but need to allow a few more days for delivery.

 

12.12.06 14 Days Up - Should send LBA, but still no proof of delivery for Prelim letter. (Still states "Check back later" on Royal Mail online tracking). Thought I'd give the bank 1 weeks grace due to Christmas post.

 

19.12.06 Received reply from Lloyds dated 12.12.06. It was the standard "I am sorry you are unhappy about account charges" letter in response to my Prelim letter, even though my Prelim Letter still has not been signed for! (Christmas post probably!) So I went ahead and sent the LBA.

 

22.12.06 Chase Royal Mail re delivery. Again - LBA has still not been signed for as delivered and RM do not know what has happened to it.

 

I'm now reading up in as much detail as possible on the next stage; thinking I will go ahead and issue my claim on the 2nd Jan, 14 days from the 19th Dec (the date I sent my LBA) whether I hear from them or not.

 

Do you think I've given the bank enough time to respond, bearing in mind the delays in post this time of year?

 

Cheers & Happy New Year to you all.

 

Wavelab

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As long as you have given them the 14 days that you said you would, I would then start the Court claim.

Good luck:) , and keep us informed on how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Finally plucked up the courage after reading, reading and more reading of this great forum; to start my claim using MCOL. Within two days after filing my claim, Lloyds have sent me a letter saying they will to pay me £750 - about £1100 short of my total claim amount. And that the £750 will be in my account within a few days.

 

I have read on these pages that I should accept this, but only as a partial payment and that I should proceed with my claim for the full amount + interest and costs.

 

Does anyone know how this will affect the claim I have filed for £1800? I will of course inform the court that Lloyds have paid £750 of this claim - unless anyone knows otherwise.

 

Wavelab.

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've already filed the claim, then send this slightly amended version of the site's template and proceed as usual;

Response to settlement offer

Dear Sir/Madam

ACCOUNT No: ****** ********

CLAIM No: *******

 

Thank you for your recent letter in which you offer settlement to the matters as detailed above by way of a payment of £750.

 

I respectfully decline this offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £***.

 

I will accept the sum offered only as a part payment and on the clear understanding that I will continue with the County Court action to recover the full amount debited by way of charges.

Further, a claim was filed on **/**/** (details as above), before this offer was made. As such, court costs have also been incurred to the value of £*** and 8% interest has been added to the claim pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act.

Accordingly, should you credit my account with the £750 as proposed, the total amount still outstanding will be, to date, £****

I trust this clarifies my position.

Yours faithfully

 

If/when the £750 hits your account, notify the court that you have received it in part settlement only. Just a short informal note will be fine, addressed to the court manager.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...