Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Savers are pouring money into cash Isas as they look to protect the interest on their nest eggs from tax. They put more than £11bn into cash Isas in April.View the full article
    • The stock ended the trading day at nearly $136, up 3.5%, making it more valuable than Microsoft.View the full article
    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

settlement percentage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A DCA may well accept the offer but I would suggest

starting to offer at 10% leaving room to negotiate.

Please do not make any speculative payments as

a Full & Final payment make the offers in writting

and get clear written acceptance.

You can make the offers conditional on the removal

of all adverse data from the credit reference agencies.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been offered a lump sum to pay off my unsecured debt, but the settlement figure works out to 20% of the debt.

 

Would DCAs except this figure

 

That would depend. Many say that these DCA's buy the debt or are sold the debt for as little as 10p in the pound. How real that may be or how close to that figure may depend on the original amount. I offered about 30% of my £9.5K loan, upped it by a further £1K but eventually they settled for 50% recently. That was as much as i had to negotiate with luckily. I would say start low regardless of the amount you have and if you have anymore, use that as your bargaining chip. Because if you start with all that you have, and they reject it, you have nothing to go back with. It's not being dishonest, its an unwritten rule of negotiating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it depends on length of debt your age and whether the creditor thinks they will get more back in the long run. this is what a creditor told me when i was going through this last year with mbna! send the full ans final letter off and see what they come back with. but check any ppi and charges first

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd never pay a dca anything!!

 

get reclaiming first to drop the outstanding balances

 

then check your CRA file to make SURE any debt shows!

 

hope you've not blindly been paying them

!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bit more info would be helpful.,which DCA has made the offer and do they own the debt.

 

If the DCA owns the debt taking into account what they paid for the debt,(7% to 15%)if it was 20% of the balance outstanding that would be quite good but before you accept any offer update us on who etc and what the balance is outstanding along with the original amount,was there any PPI and have there been any charges.Sorry lots of questions but Full and Final can be a minefield

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd never pay a dca anything!!

 

get reclaiming first to drop the outstanding balances

 

then check your CRA file to make SURE any debt shows!

 

hope you've not blindly been paying them

!

 

dx

 

Absolutely spot on! As for speculating on the amount a DCA would pay an OC, I would guess it is nowhere near the percentage mentioned in an earlier post.

 

A couple of years ago someone on this site managed to discover the purchase price a DCA paid to Barclaycard for their outstanding CC debt.......it worked out at 3%. Not a bad business model if they are recovering 50% in full and final settlement!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you received any discount letters fromany dca's?

 

if you have, drop the debt

 

if a debt does not show on your cra ignore those debts too

if you are paying to a debt that is not on your cra

i'd have a serious think about WHY?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it certainly is a minefield. I have had an informal arrangement for over four years now. All are showing on my credit file. I have reclaimed the ppi.

 

I feel that i should pay back these debts, but unfortunately due to unforeseen financial restraints i am unable to fully satisfy them.

 

This offer from a family member is only on the table with the proviso it clears the majority of the unsecured debt.

 

Not sure as to what to say in the f&f letter. I am not the best at writing offical sounding letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked for penalty charges too?

 

F&F details are below in my sig.

 

but pers i'd NEVER F&F a debt

unless ALL neg data is removed AND the debt is marked SETTLED & not Partial settlement.

 

you might as well BURN the money if they wont do that.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...