Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer changing salary, hours and post title


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My workplace is going through managing change and my post is being devalued and re-evaluated.

 

It looks like my working hours will be decreased by up to 10 hours and i will be working for at least £3 per hour less. My post title will also be being changed.

 

My question is once the changes come into play - do i have to accept? Or can i demand redundancy?

 

I have been informed that a 6 month protected pay will be in operation - i take it if i accept the protected pay for 6 months this will mean i cannot get redundancy payment???

 

I have worked for company for 14 years.

 

Any help greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, you unfortunately can't claim redundancy. For that to happen, the post itself has to go, not be reprofiled, changed or otherwise amended. You might be able to negotiate a redundancy, but there is no automatic right. Therefore, whether you accept the change in contract or not, the impact on a redundancy payment is nil, because there is no redundancy. Yet!

 

This sounds like a really tough set of changes to your contract - is the business in trouble I wonder? If it is, then it is possible that redundancies may follow further down the line, and the danger of having your hours and rate of pay changed is that this COULD affect any future redundancy payment, for that will be based on any contract which is in place at the time of the redundancy. Is it likely that the employer could be doing this to reduce financial liabilities in the future?

 

In terms of the changes being made, has there been any negotiation, or is this presented as a done deal? Has there been any Union involvement?

 

The employer can only make changes to the contract either with your agreement, or by terminating your current contract and offering to re-engage you on the new terms. You do not have to accept, but could effectively be resigning if you do not. In that case, you might have cause to look at Constructive Dismissal, but this would need rather more specialist advice.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sidewinder.

 

I think the post is going. The service is changing and the tasks associated to the post are also changing. HR are currently working on the salary grading for the new post.

 

The business isn't in trouble as such and has a fairly healthy bank balance and accounts, but the government funding that is associated with part of my post is being cut/stopped so this is why the service and job is being forced to change.

 

This previously happened a few years back in a certain local authority area and my employer did offer redundancy to the employees affected but this was on a much smaller scale and only affected a handful of staff.

 

The change that will affect me will also affect apx 70 other members of staff in same position as me. I don't have Union representation and as far as I know there is not enough members of staff in the union for the union to want to be involved.

 

Basically the changes are a done deal but there has been consultation (well with a handful of staff representatives) which i'm sure means the employer can tick the box to say that staff have been involved in negotiations.

 

There will definately be job losses but probably for staff on lower grades than myself and the employers have intimated this fact for the last 12 - 24 months; but everyone still in limbo at moment.

 

At the end of the day it looks like i will still be working just as hard with a different job title for apx £4,000 less salary, although this figure is an estimated guess at the moment as i have not been consulted in the salary benchmarking for the new post.

 

So if like the handful of staff that were offered redundancy a few years ago - I am offered redundancy - If I take this offer - do I have to take it straight away before the 6 month protected pay comes into play?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...