Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Petrol / mantainance for car.


Life-Goes-On
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4487 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Advice please.

 

My GF drives me everywhere I need to go (I'm not allowed to drive), we live apart and have no plans to change this.

 

I want to pay my share towards the cost of car (about 1/4 share)

 

What is the best way to go about this?

Give her the money? Could be either cash or bank transfer

Take a turn putting petrol in, so paying for the petrol.

 

Any suggestions would help.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are both living in separate properties, then I don't see that LTAHAW should be a major problem, unless of course you and/or her are spending significant amounts of time at each other's properties.

 

Though back to the question, I would probably suggest keeping it on a casual cash basis.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks:

A thread about travelling costs went on it's own return journey. :)

 

Hee!

 

Right, so as I understand it, you want to help your GF out with some petrol money but want to avoid being seen as LTAHAW since you're not actually living together. That correct?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We see each other most nights, (think she wants to check I'm ok) and spend the odd night together (about 5 in the last 6 months)

 

I have read the rules and know currently we shouldn't be classed as LTAHAW, but we know we do have to be careful. so wanted advise on what to do, in case I am ever asked about it.

 

BTW Even if my benefits wasn't affected we wouldn't live together, I have always liked my own space to much to give it up.

 

Antone: In a nutshell yes, what to cover all bases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks:

A thread about travelling costs went on it's own return journey. :)

:lol:

 

I can give you my opinion but it is only an opinion...

 

Giving her petrol costs for the fuel consumption as a result of assisting you, is not really any different to your paying for a taxi to do the same. Why would you pay stupid costs of taxi fares if she is able and willing to take you at a significantly lower cost? I also see it as no different from paying a friend's petrol costs, I see nothing wrong in it. You are not contributing toward her costs, you are contributing toward the cost of the fuel which is used for your benefit.

 

I don't recall (in fact not sure I even know) why you are on ESA but I would suggest to you that if there is a possibility that if you are eligible for DLA that you apply. If you qualify for the higher mobility rate and choose to go for the mobility car, she can be your named driver - you don't have to be able to drive yourself to go on motobility. If you qualify for mid or high rate care, she could also claim carers allowance for you.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been claiming since June 2008.

Had medical and "passed" got 16 points (should have had over 50)

At the end of 08 claimed DLA was rejected (the ATOS "medical" as many have found was a complete joke), so appealed

Took over a year (Jan 10) as got awarded LRC & LRM but only for a year.

 

Reapplied Dec 10, filled out the forms very much the same as I did first time, was expecting to get rejected and have to appeal.

Much to my surprised got awarded it without a medical, and also now got MRC & LRM

 

I didn't realize how much difference getting MRC made.

 

I live alone so get extra due to add ons with the other benefit.

 

I don't think GF could get CA for me as she works full time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a Blue Badge, as I applied thought my LA, and have for 3 years (is the the max?)

 

Never really looked at the letter till just now,

 

They have ticked "That is badge is to be issued without a further assessment"

 

Does that mean I might not have to be reassessed in Jan 2014 when it runs out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would not want your GF to claim carers allowance anyway, as it would result in you losing the extra you get in other benerfits through the severe disability premium

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Life you have been awarded DLA Mobilty low rate, this money is awarded to you because you have mobility needs and need extra help you to get out and about, its paid to you so you can get help to get around making life a bit easier for you....

its up to you how you spend it as long as it helps you,

so dont worry :)

 

you are spending it on what the goverment intended it to be spent on

getting around

simples

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...