Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did as soon as i received the grade, i was on annual leave over December and my line manager was due to leave on the 15th December, i did not receive the review until i returned to work. SO i never had the opportunity to have a review. I challenged it straight away and raised a complaint to HR, who never responded to me,
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car broke after 2 days, need help.!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

there is a guy across the road from me who is selling cars under the company name of Stones' Motor Company.

 

I bought a renault megane off him for £695.

I purchased this on friday the 10th of february 2012 and on sunday the 12th the exhaust pipe underneath the car detatched itself from the front end

and is now hanging down and it is unsafe to drive.

 

I have spoken to the person who sold me the car who has assured me since sunday it would be fixed but am still waiting for something to be done.

 

I had some correspondence with him today and he told me somebody from his garage would be coming to pick the car up and weld it back on but nobody has come.

He also said if it isnt able to be welded there is nothing he can do.

 

i do not trust this guy any more and i am going to get it checked for safety after (or if at all) the required work is carried out.

 

My question is if it is not repaired to a safe standard or repaired at all where do i stand legally, am i able to get a refund?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks in Advance =)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, confirm that he is a dealer and not a private seller ?

 

If so, then you are covered by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) which means the car must be of 'satisfactory quality'.

 

Now the price and age of the car would need to be taken into account, but not 2 days after purchase, it should be fit for the purpose that is was sold.

It would be best to correspond in writing, so don't be afraid of him, go across the road and hand him the letter mentioning the above act and he has been given adequate time to repair the car, so you are giving him one more opportunity which expires in 24 hours upon which you will take the car to another garage and have it repaaired handing him the bill, (you will have had to pay the bill first).

 

If he doesn't help you, then take it to the garage and give him the bill requesting payment within 7 days. At the end of those 7 days, you drop him another letter giving him another 7 days but this time the letter will be headed 'Letter Before Action' and atelling him that failure to pay will result in a claim in the small claims court.

 

You can do small claims on line and it isn't expensive either - https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/web/mcol/welcome

 

This might all seem long winded, but it is the way you are expected to go and will show any court, if it should come to that, that you have been reasonable and given him ample opportunity to rectify the situation.

 

Only threaten court if you are prepared to go through with it though.

 

You don't have to drop the letter off in person, you can do it through the post but I would recommend it be sent recorded delivery if you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that i will follow your advice..!! Well when i bought the car he handed me a receipt in which he had written stones motor company, his address and the amount paid with his signature. So i guess that makes him trading as a dealer and not a private seller? i am not clear on the rules on this.

 

But i will certainly follow your advice thankyou =)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some further info:-

 

Thanks for that it is a very good link and i shall read it later. There doesnt seem to be anything on there about people fraudulently acting as dealers. Only thing i can find is dealers posing as private sellers and not the other way round. =/

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be quite honest, on a £695 car, you can't expect him to move heaven and earth in order to sort it out... if he's said he'llsort it then I daresay he will, but be careful that if you get on his nerves he'll say 'get on with it....'

 

Most cars under £1000 are nearing the end of their life, so be careful....

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be quite honest, on a £695 car, you can't expect him to move heaven and earth in order to sort it out... if he's said he'llsort it then I daresay he will, but be careful that if you get on his nerves he'll say 'get on with it....'

 

Most cars under £1000 are nearing the end of their life, so be careful....

 

SOGA still applies Bob especially after only 2 days.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam, despite the fact that soga does indeed apply, for goodness sake be realistic... It is NOT going to be a good car for £695 is it?

 

And at that mnoey the dealer is far more likely to say get on with it than if it was £6950.

 

Thats all I'm saynig... you can quote soga at people all day long, but for £695 he's got a fight on his hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW OP I am nOT saying that yuo've deliberately gone and bought and old clunker of a car... motoring is an expensive business these days and that was very likely all yuo could afford.

 

The point I'm making is that at that mnoey you don't get much of a car.

 

The exhaust hangng down does not make it unsafe... undriveable in case it catches a speed hump, yes, and mot failure yes, but unsafe.. no.

 

Give him a chance to fix it... although I susoect that if you go back there with anything much more than that he'll tell you where to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam, despite the fact that soga does indeed apply, for goodness sake be realistic... It is NOT going to be a good car for £695 is it?

 

And at that mnoey the dealer is far more likely to say get on with it than if it was £6950.

 

Thats all I'm saynig... you can quote soga at people all day long, but for £695 he's got a fight on his hands.

 

Bob, obviously the exhaust was shot when the OP bought the car so it wasn't fit for the purpose. It dosn't matter whether it cost £695 or £69.50, it should be fit for the purpose and clearly it wasn't The seller must rectify it end of. I would be inclined to agree with you if we were talking a few months down the line.

 

OP should follow the advice given by Conniff.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... but it may well end in tears!

 

For example how do we know that the OP hasn't driven over a speed hump or something and damaged the exhaust himself?

 

I'm not saynig he has, just saying what the seller might say.

 

If he's offering to get it repaired then he should be given fair opportunity to do so.

 

If they get it up on a ramp and the exhaust is damaged by its having been driven over a spped hump / rock etc then for me that's be tough... I'd get it welded but at the OPs expense.

 

I know the law is the law and soga applies.. bt if the law really was the law then 100 MPs would be in prison for thieving and not still MPs... and it appears that HMRC can 'lose' the details of 26,000,000 taxpayers and no one is held to account but I would get a fine and a snotty letter if I sent in my VAT return a day late.

 

The law is not always your friend and the OP should be careful bearing in mnid the price pais for the car.

 

I don't to get into a big discussion on this as it will run off topic and will say no more, save to say that in the real world its nearly always a question of what's possible and not what your rights might be under soga.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your input guys.

 

Bob as the other poster says i believe that it shouldnt matter how much it cost the rule of law still applies does it not, he has had since sunday to rectify the problem and still has not been in touch although i have seen him outside 'sorting' other cars out so clearly he thinks this is not an issue for him to swiftly deal with, which i think it is.

 

Furthermore i would deem it to be unsafe as it could cause an accident.

 

Either way it is a moot point and i will be following coniffs advice.

 

I may also be reporting him to the OFT as i do now believe he is illegally posing as a dealer.

 

=)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... but it may well end in tears!

 

For example how do we know that the OP hasn't driven over a speed hump or something and damaged the exhaust himself?

 

I'm not saynig he has, just saying what the seller might say.

 

If he's offering to get it repaired then he should be given fair opportunity to do so.

 

If they get it up on a ramp and the exhaust is damaged by its having been driven over a spped hump / rock etc then for me that's be tough... I'd get it welded but at the OPs expense.

 

I know the law is the law and soga applies.. bt if the law really was the law then 100 MPs would be in prison for thieving and not still MPs... and it appears that HMRC can 'lose' the details of 26,000,000 taxpayers and no one is held to account but I would get a fine and a snotty letter if I sent in my VAT return a day late.

 

The law is not always your friend and the OP should be careful bearing in mnid the price pais for the car.

 

I don't to get into a big discussion on this as it will run off topic and will say no more, save to say that in the real world its nearly always a question of what's possible and not what your rights might be under soga.

 

So are you saying you think i should just sit back, accept this and move on and let him get away with it?? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... but it may well end in tears!

 

For example how do we know that the OP hasn't driven over a speed hump or something and damaged the exhaust himself?

 

I'm not saynig he has, just saying what the seller might say.

 

We don't but the advice being offered is based on the info that the OP has provided. (see my signature)

 

 

 

If he's offering to get it repaired then he should be given fair opportunity to do so.

 

Absolutely

 

If they get it up on a ramp and the exhaust is damaged by its having been driven over a spped hump / rock etc then for me that's be tough... I'd get it welded but at the OPs expense.

 

Agreed

 

I know the law is the law and soga applies.. bt if the law really was the law then 100 MPs would be in prison for thieving and not still MPs... and it appears that HMRC can 'lose' the details of 26,000,000 taxpayers and no one is held to account but I would get a fine and a snotty letter if I sent in my VAT return a day late.

 

Slightly irrelevant but I know where you are coming from

 

The law is not always your friend and the OP should be careful bearing in mnid the price pais for the car.

 

I don't to get into a big discussion on this as it will run off topic and will say no more, save to say that in the real world its nearly always a question of what's possible and not what your rights might be under soga.

 

Again, all agreed BUT in this case time is deffinately on the OPs side.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP... its your car, you own it, do as you wish, all I'm saying is that if you go in heavy with a soga letter in yuor hand you're more likely to be told where to go, thats all. If the car was £6950 it'd be a totally different ball game.. and I DO understand that that's probalby all you could afford to spend on a car, I'm not having a go at you or anybody.

 

look at it logically... you paid £695 for the car... it probably owed the dealer £500 or so. There are NO CIRCUMSTANCES under which you can get some kind of safety check done following the exhaust repair and then confront him with a £500 bill and expect it to be paid,, it won't happen, he'll either tell you where to go or just give you back your money.

 

Hopefully the exhaust can be welded (most clever welders can work wonders) and all will be ok... I sincerely hope so.

 

No I 've NEVER said let him get away with it.. he's offered to fix it, get him to do so: if he won't ask for your money back, I'm sure you'll get it.

 

BTW you can't illegally be a private seller and pose as a dealer, you can only illegally pose as a private seller when you are in fact a dealer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...