Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Motormile Finance DCA- Doorstep Visit **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wage Day Advance and pay day loan companies sell there debt on to this company. I am making repayments of a loan via standing order to these and they have sent a door collector who started shouting and humiliating me in front of my neighbours. He is called EDIT What do I do as I am already paying one account and they are refusing to acknowledge this and say I now have to make an agreement to pay off another. They have now sent a doorstep collector around to my property today for the second time even though they are getting ten pounds per month. I told them I just had a baby and cant afford it but as they keep knocking and humiliating me what can I do about it.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS
Mention of collectors name.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wage Day Advance and pay day loan companies sell there debt on to this company. I am making repayments of a loan via standing order to these and they have sent a door collector who started shouting and humiliating me in front of my neighbours. He is called EDIT What do I do as I am already paying one account and they are refusing to acknowledge this and say I now have to make an agreement to pay off another. They have now sent a doorstep collector around to my property today for the second time even though they are getting ten pounds per month. I told them I just had a baby and cant afford it but as they keep knocking and humiliating me what can I do about it.

 

Hi lduffy, if you've sent them the letter/email advising them that they are not welcome at your property without an appointment then i'd record any subsequent visits and forward on to trading standards or the police.

 

You need to take the power back from them, first thing i would do is to stop making the payments on the other account and tell them that unless you can come to a solution that works for you without harassment or pestering then they won't see another penny from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have edited the collectors name from your post

as it may have repercussions should they deny your#

allegation.

Now to answer your questions

No.1 A formal complaint to the compliance manager

of MM regarding the visit and the collectors ''attitude''.

Add to this a strict requirement that they must cease all

home visits as they now amount to harassment and you

are reporting this to the OFT immediately.

If these collectors call again please dial 999 and state that

you feel threatened and harassed and frightened and fear

your the safety of your baby, tell the collector to leave

and that the police have been called.

 

 

Send the complaint by recorded delivery

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send this letter by recorded delivery - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?119980-Telephone-Harrassment-Template-Letter .....or if you know a local friendly policeman/woman get him/her to call the company as they (the police) would like to be in attendance next time the collector calls....

 

And PLEASE, PLEASE do report them to the OFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wage Day Advance and pay day loan companies sell there debt on to this company. I am making repayments of a loan via standing order to these and they have sent a door collector who started shouting and humiliating me in front of my neighbours. He is called EDIT What do I do as I am already paying one account and they are refusing to acknowledge this and say I now have to make an agreement to pay off another. They have now sent a doorstep collector around to my property today for the second time even though they are getting ten pounds per month. I told them I just had a baby and cant afford it but as they keep knocking and humiliating me what can I do about it.

 

this thread is nearly a year old

you should really start your own thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...