Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Invalid default/termination - Welcome Finance - FOS Final decision - URGENT HELP


timtimbo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've been having a nightmare with welcome finance for ages now, with ICO and FOS, still not alot happening.

 

Anyway long story short,

 

Got into differculty in 2009 as alot of us did when the banks system crashed, was late with some payment and ended up getting my loan re-written any paid the reduce rate for a while only to be informed that they had re-written it as they agreed and they ended defaulting me.

 

Welcome have admitted that they failed to follow the correct procedure when dealing with the default, registered on my credit file the same date as the notice was issued and that the outstanding balance they are reporting is incorrect. They have told me that they'll amend the registered date and correct the outstanding balance three time now and still not be actioned over six months after the first time they said they'd do it.

 

So I'd like to issue a section 10 notice on the bases that they are reporting incorrect info to the CCA's however none of the letters I've found on here fit to my circustance's.

 

Can anyone point me in the right direction, or help me tailor one to my needs.

 

And yes I have every intention of taking the gits to court to enforce it, think I've got a fairly good case as they've admitted their errors just done sod all about it.

 

In advance thanks for all you help much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically a section 10 notice needs ;

 

1.To outline the reason why processing/sharing of your data should cease,giving any info about adverse affects it will have on you if it is continued.

 

2.Give a reasonable timeframe for the cessation to be actioned.

 

3.Addressed to the Data Controller.

 

 

There is further guidance under technical on the ICO website.

 

You should take into account any further processing/sharing that may need performing in the course of dealing with unresolved issues.

IE- you cant expect a s10 to be accepted and implimented while they are dealing with a SAR or CC request.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also this may be of interest.Technical guidance for filing defaults and credit reporting.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Practical_application/DEFAULT_TGN_VERSION_V3%20DOC.ashx

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to ask-have Welcome put this in writing ?

Also have you kept copies of letters to them ?

The Credit reference is also liable too.

You need to be contacting them and informing them.

I think also you should be filing a complaint with the ICO-but they would want some evidence of you trying to get it sorted.

Copies of any letters should do the trick.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, complaint ongoing with the ICO and FOS about this and all there rubbish,

 

Am I right in thinking that you can use a section 10 to stop certain action, like reporting data to third parties?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes a section 10 notice prevents all processing/sharing and reporting.

If you are getting nowhere with the regulators then you could fire off a s10 notice giving them 10 days,and also a 14 day lba advising if they dont comply you will be seeking a Court order for compliance.

The way I would do it is issue a small claims action asking for compensation for breach of the DPA at the Courts discretion,with an order that they cease processing.

The LBA would need to go to their registered office.

The s10 the same-but addressed to the Data controller or compliance manager.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Registered OfficeKingston House, Centre 27 Business Park, Woodhead Road, Birstall, Batley, West Yorkshire, WF17 9TD

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Right were do I start, I’ll jot everything down to start with and then ask for help at the end.

Well in 2008 I got made redundant twice and as a result had difficulty meeting my financial commitments, I struggled for as long as possible but after a while things became difficult.

So during 2009 I ended up stopping paying Welcome Finance my payments, after a while I contacted them to offer a token payment, which they refused unless I went through a recognised debt management company.

In August they contacted me and offered to rewrite my agreement, I declined as it was unaffordable.

In September 2009 they contacted me again and reoffered to rewrite to debt in effect for 25% of the previous payment, so I agreed and made the payments for 3 months.

December 2009 after my third payment they tell me I need to sign paperwork for rewrite and ask me to make an appointment to complete the required paperwork, I agree an appointment for the Next Saturday.

At either 4:45pm or 5:45pm they leave a message on my answer phone telling me that if I do not confirm my appointment in the next 15 minutes, they will not rewrite my agreement. Well as so as I got off the tube and received the message, I tried to call my branch and the customer services number. No answer at my branch and customer services were unable to help all Friday evening and weekend.

Monday called my branch to be informed that the rewrite was not formal until paperwork signed and Welcome stopped rewriting loans late on the Friday so I was required to revert to my previous repayments.

Anyway I filed a formal complaint a few days later, and heard nothing until mid January 2010, spoke to an area manager, who agreed to rewrite the loan, I asked him to put something in writing and again heard nothing.

I tried to get answers from customer services a number of times but got nothing.

Filed a complaint with the FOS, about the agreed rewrite being withdrawn after I believed it had been started.

April/May 2010, I carried out a credit check on my files and found a default notice against me from Welcome Finance, on approximately the same date the Area Manager agreed to rewrite my debt in January 2010, I immediately contact Welcome Finance, who referred me to a debt collection agency, who I contact and agreed a reduce settlement figure, I requested that my default be removed and all agreed, ask for this in writing which they sent out.

Once I received this I contacted them explained that I had a complaint about this running with the FOS and they advised that I should wait for the FOS to respond and they agreed to hold the offer

Anyway in December 2010 I received the FOS 1st review, completely rejected my complaint. I then wrote to the debt agency and re-instated my offer and followed up a few weeks later, to be informed that Welcome Finance had put my account on hold.

A few days later a new debt collection agency contacted me apparently the debt had been transferred to them now and they had specific instructions not to accept settlement offers.

Any during December I had issued a SAR and CCA request to welcome and question the information they had reported to the CRA’s.

Anyway it transpired that Welcome finance had register the default notice with the CRA’s the same day they issued the default to me.

Anyway went back to the FOS.

Today the FOS have come back to me with a letter offering settlement.

  • They agree that Welcome should not have continued adding interest to my account after informing me and FOS that interest was frozen, and Welcome have agreed to wipe interest and pay £50 D&I.
  • They agree that Welcome should not have registered the default the same day as the notice was issued, but that it should remain as is, as the correct procedure would not have made a difference as I did not settle.
  • Do not believe that there is any evidence that Welcome agreed to rewrite my debt, even though I provided evidence of payments.
  • Do not believe that Welcome did anything wrong when then transferred my account from a company who had agreed a reduced settlement to another company.

Now sorry I have provided the FOS with evidence of offer to debt collect agency, and stated that I never received the default notice as I had recently moved as stated on my credit reports. So I have evidenced that if I had the chance I would have resolved the issue before the default was registered.

My question is Welcome Finance and the FOS have agreed that the correct procedures were not followed when applying the default to my credit files, doesn’t this make the default invalid and what can I do to get it removed from my credit file. Any examples of similar case’s that I can evidence to the FOS and Welcome to get the default removed.

Please any help would really be appreciated as this has been dragging on and I’ve just had enough.

Thanks to all in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right were do I start, I’ll jot everything down to start with and then ask for help at the end.

Well in 2008 I got made redundant twice and as a result had difficulty meeting my financial commitments, I struggled for as long as possible but after a while things became difficult.

So during 2009 I ended up stopping paying Welcome Finance my payments, after a while I contacted them to offer a token payment, which they refused unless I went through a recognised debt management company.

In August they contacted me and offered to rewrite my agreement, I declined as it was unaffordable.

In September 2009 they contacted me again and reoffered to rewrite to debt in effect for 25% of the previous payment, so I agreed and made the payments for 3 months.

December 2009 after my third payment they tell me I need to sign paperwork for rewrite and ask me to make an appointment to complete the required paperwork, I agree an appointment for the Next Saturday.

At either 4:45pm or 5:45pm they leave a message on my answer phone telling me that if I do not confirm my appointment in the next 15 minutes, they will not rewrite my agreement. Well as so as I got off the tube and received the message, I tried to call my branch and the customer services number. No answer at my branch and customer services were unable to help all Friday evening and weekend.

Monday called my branch to be informed that the rewrite was not formal until paperwork signed and Welcome stopped rewriting loans late on the Friday so I was required to revert to my previous repayments.

Anyway I filed a formal complaint a few days later, and heard nothing until mid January 2010, spoke to an area manager, who agreed to rewrite the loan, I asked him to put something in writing and again heard nothing.

I tried to get answers from customer services a number of times but got nothing.

Filed a complaint with the FOS, about the agreed rewrite being withdrawn after I believed it had been started.

April/May 2010, I carried out a credit check on my files and found a default notice against me from Welcome Finance, on approximately the same date the Area Manager agreed to rewrite my debt in January 2010, I immediately contact Welcome Finance, who referred me to a debt collection agency, who I contact and agreed a reduce settlement figure, I requested that my default be removed and all agreed, ask for this in writing which they sent out.

Once I received this I contacted them explained that I had a complaint about this running with the FOS and they advised that I should wait for the FOS to respond and they agreed to hold the offer

Anyway in December 2010 I received the FOS 1st review, completely rejected my complaint. I then wrote to the debt agency and re-instated my offer and followed up a few weeks later, to be informed that Welcome Finance had put my account on hold.

A few days later a new debt collection agency contacted me apparently the debt had been transferred to them now and they had specific instructions not to accept settlement offers.

Any during December I had issued a SAR and CCA request to welcome and question the information they had reported to the CRA’s.

Anyway it transpired that Welcome finance had register the default notice with the CRA’s the same day they issued the default to me.

Anyway went back to the FOS.

Today the FOS have come back to me with a letter offering settlement.

  • They agree that Welcome should not have continued adding interest to my account after informing me and FOS that interest was frozen, and Welcome have agreed to wipe interest and pay £50 D&I.
  • They agree that Welcome should not have registered the default the same day as the notice was issued, but that it should remain as is, as the correct procedure would not have made a difference as I did not settle.
  • Do not believe that there is any evidence that Welcome agreed to rewrite my debt, even though I provided evidence of payments.
  • Do not believe that Welcome did anything wrong when then transferred my account from a company who had agreed a reduced settlement to another company.

Now sorry I have provided the FOS with evidence of offer to debt collect agency, and stated that I never received the default notice as I had recently moved as stated on my credit reports. So I have evidenced that if I had the chance I would have resolved the issue before the default was registered.

My question is Welcome Finance and the FOS have agreed that the correct procedures were not followed when applying the default to my credit files, doesn’t this make the default invalid and what can I do to get it removed from my credit file. Any examples of similar case’s that I can evidence to the FOS and Welcome to get the default removed.

Please any help would really be appreciated as this has been dragging on and I’ve just had enough.

Thanks to all in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right were do I start, I’ll jot everything down to start with and then ask for help at the end.

Well in 2008 I got made redundant twice and as a result had difficulty meeting my financial commitments, I struggled for as long as possible but after a while things became difficult.

So during 2009 I ended up stopping paying Welcome Finance my payments, after a while I contacted them to offer a token payment, which they refused unless I went through a recognised debt management company.

In August they contacted me and offered to rewrite my agreement, I declined as it was unaffordable.

In September 2009 they contacted me again and reoffered to rewrite to debt in effect for 25% of the previous payment, so I agreed and made the payments for 3 months.

December 2009 after my third payment they tell me I need to sign paperwork for rewrite and ask me to make an appointment to complete the required paperwork, I agree an appointment for the Next Saturday.

At either 4:45pm or 5:45pm they leave a message on my answer phone telling me that if I do not confirm my appointment in the next 15 minutes, they will not rewrite my agreement. Well as so as I got off the tube and received the message, I tried to call my branch and the customer services number. No answer at my branch and customer services were unable to help all Friday evening and weekend.

Monday called my branch to be informed that the rewrite was not formal until paperwork signed and Welcome stopped rewriting loans late on the Friday so I was required to revert to my previous repayments.

Anyway I filed a formal complaint a few days later, and heard nothing until mid January 2010, spoke to an area manager, who agreed to rewrite the loan, I asked him to put something in writing and again heard nothing.

I tried to get answers from customer services a number of times but got nothing.

Filed a complaint with the FOS, about the agreed rewrite being withdrawn after I believed it had been started.

April/May 2010, I carried out a credit check on my files and found a default notice against me from Welcome Finance, on approximately the same date the Area Manager agreed to rewrite my debt in January 2010, I immediately contact Welcome Finance, who referred me to a debt collection agency, who I contact and agreed a reduce settlement figure, I requested that my default be removed and all agreed, ask for this in writing which they sent out.

Once I received this I contacted them explained that I had a complaint about this running with the FOS and they advised that I should wait for the FOS to respond and they agreed to hold the offer

Anyway in December 2010 I received the FOS 1st review, completely rejected my complaint. I then wrote to the debt agency and re-instated my offer and followed up a few weeks later, to be informed that Welcome Finance had put my account on hold.

A few days later a new debt collection agency contacted me apparently the debt had been transferred to them now and they had specific instructions not to accept settlement offers.

Any during December I had issued a SAR and CCA request to welcome and question the information they had reported to the CRA’s.

Anyway it transpired that Welcome finance had register the default notice with the CRA’s the same day they issued the default to me.

Anyway went back to the FOS.

Today the FOS have come back to me with a letter offering settlement.

  • They agree that Welcome should not have continued adding interest to my account after informing me and FOS that interest was frozen, and Welcome have agreed to wipe interest and pay £50 D&I.
  • They agree that Welcome should not have registered the default the same day as the notice was issued, but that it should remain as is, as the correct procedure would not have made a difference as I did not settle.
  • Do not believe that there is any evidence that Welcome agreed to rewrite my debt, even though I provided evidence of payments.
  • Do not believe that Welcome did anything wrong when then transferred my account from a company who had agreed a reduced settlement to another company.

Now sorry I have provided the FOS with evidence of offer to debt collect agency, and stated that I never received the default notice as I had recently moved as stated on my credit reports. So I have evidenced that if I had the chance I would have resolved the issue before the default was registered.

My question is Welcome Finance and the FOS have agreed that the correct procedures were not followed when applying the default to my credit files, doesn’t this make the default invalid and what can I do to get it removed from my credit file. Any examples of similar case’s that I can evidence to the FOS and Welcome to get the default removed.

Please any help would really be appreciated as this has been dragging on and I’ve just had enough.

Thanks to all in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please correct me if I am wrong, as I see it the FOS is saying although the correct procedures

were no used to record the default the have ruled that the default would have been placed

anyway so it makes no difference?

You can appeal the FOS decision,apart from that I can see no other way,.

You would need to submit all the information again, and highlight the particular

parts of the response you want to challenge.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I understand that and have declined the offer made.

 

My argument is that it is more than plausible that Welcome Finance did not issue the default notice considering they have acknowledged that they failed to follow the correct proceedures and even if they did issue the default notice I had recently moved address. I have demonstrated by contacting Welcome Finance and their shy management company and making an offer to settle as soon as I became aware of the default, that had I received to default notice with I would have made attempts to resolve the issue within the permitted time and the default notice would never have been added to my credit files.

 

What I am after is some evidence with regards to the processing of default notices and registration with CRA's which would deem the invalid and mean they must be removed, to add weight to my argument.

 

Anything that would help would be greatly appreciated, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

The validity of the DN hangs on the dates and the time allowed for the debtor

to remedy the default, if they don't comply the DN is invalid, or if the default is recorded before

the debtor has received the DN, so you have the argument for removal in your thread above.

A formal complaint back to FOS statement that the default should remain, which I believe is unfair

to say the least.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tim,

lets open this up a bit and get others to advise to. I will bump the thread

to that end.

Brig.

 

BUMP>

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you would be able ton appeal the FOS decision that the default should stay that seems

to fly in the face of fairness if nothing else.

I am not familiar with rhe process to appeal the decision.

So i'll bump the post for others to advise.

 

BUMP

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Can`t answer specific points but hope this helps. FOS have given their final assesment on my default (bank charges). The "service" rarely overturns defaults and my experience is that they will go to any length to uphold one. If you can prove the correct procedure wasn`t followed you would have a good case in court if you can get representation. From 1st adjudication to final took 18 months so I would certainly refer your complaint back as soon as possible.

 

One piece of good news, there is a case which has just been heard (verdict pending as I write) which covers a large chunk of your issues. Search the forum for Brandon v Amex.

 

Very best of luck to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

URGENT HELP REQUIRED

 

I appreciate that I am leaving this estreamley late, as today is the 5th and FOS have given me until the 7th to accept their final decision on my complaint. However my father has recently passed away and as a result I have not given this matter any attention at all while dealing with his affairs.

 

My initial view is that the FOS final decision is flawed and that the default / debit as is, is unenforceable, but I would appreciate some further guidance on this.

 

I wish to get an explanation of the legal implications of this decision by the FOS, some guidance on whether to accept the decision or whether to continue to challenge the legality of the default notice issued (specially considering the ombudsmans comments regarding the legality of the default notice) and the likely hood of having the adverse credit history removed from my credit file.

 

Welcome Finance has acknowledged to the FOS that they failed to follow the proper procedure set out in the Consumer Credit Act when defaulting the account. They issued default notice and registered the default with the credit agencies all on the same day. Furthermore, internal notes supplied to the FOS would indicate that the account was also terminated on the same day as the default notice being issued, however I would like this clarifying.

*

The FOS have warned me that if I don’t accept the final decision Welcome would be able to add the interest they have not been adding immediately which would considerable increase my outstanding debt, to a little less than £5,000 which does concern me, however I can’t see how this is possible as Welcome have told me that the account has been frozen since December 2009.

*

I wish to bring this whole affair to an end as quickly as possible, but my key aims are:-

• Not to pay more than the £2706.00 that the FOS says is fair, and ideally less.

• Completely remove the adverse credit history against me.

*

I would be willing to pay the full amount outstanding, however this is not completely possible at this immediate time. However would be possible in the next few months as my father left a small amount of money to each of his children.

*

In the past I have made a number of offers to pay 50% and 66% as full and final settlement, however while my complaint has been ongoing Welcome Finance have completely ignored all offers even though they have been put through the various debit collection agencies they have been using at that point of time.

*

Can anyone help me, my view is that default is unenforceable at this stage as Welcome failed to follow the correct procedures when terminating the account, defaulting me and registering the default with the credit reference agencies.

*

I would like some assistance in putting a letter together to the FOS to decline their decision, a letter to welcome explaining why the default is invalid, quoting court cases and requesting that they remove the invalid default from my credit reports, and a letter to issue to the DCA’s explaining why they are unable to chase me for the debit without a court order.

*

I will attached the letter from the FOS, the notes the FOS supplied me showing account termination and a copy of the default notice, I have hundreds of other pages of documentation which I will happily attach if required.

 

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 threads merged on the same issue

 

please keep to ONE thread concerning ALL matters

to do with this account

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...