Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
    • It’s all with current lenders and no missed payment to date. so with any reduced payment to them it’s likely to be going to debt collectors at some stage. we jointly own a property together me and my partner 
    • It’s all unsecured loans and credit cards. Mainly loans now though as most credit cards are paid off.   so 95% unsecured loans.   I just don’t know my situation job wise it’s almost impossible to say whether it’s likely or not just don’t want to be caught out by it. My mental health trying to pay this off has taken a huge hit also if I’m being honest. I feel like mentally I need some kind of respite and the credit file cost is something I can accept also. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard PPI-Denied as ppi was taken out prior to 2001!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am confused about this part, surely when you go into credit, they owe you some extra money back, if you look between June 2006 and December 2010 the cc was in credit, we were making payments we would not have needed to, not just because of the ppi, but because of the interest we were being charged as there was a balance on the card, and we were paying of an actual balance that would not have been there if we were not paying the ppi, whereas if no ppi, no balance, no payment and no interest? Or am I just totally confused?

 

On another note, where do I go from here re SAR? The forty days is up on Sunday, unless I receive everything tomorrow, which I doubt, BC will not have complied. What is my next srep regarding that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Simple bit first

 

If they don't comply within 40 days you write and tell them they are in breach of the DPA and that you want your data within 7 days. After that time you should report to the ICO. In addition you could consider court action to force compliance and seek damages at the court's discretion.

 

When you go into credit you effectively have a savings account for a period of time. The PPI redress gives you 8% interest on those savings for that month. You will have received the interest back on the ppi charged in accordance with the compound interest column in the spreadsheet. Yes, the balance would not have been there and to compensate you they give you back the premium and the interest charged on that premium and 8% on the credit balance (if there is one).

 

When the redress calculation is complete, the norm is to refund any PPI redress to the card (if there is a balance due to them). If that then puts the card in credit they send you a payment for the difference.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, I might actually be geting the hang of all this, as just realised something (or totally not getting it, if I am wrong). On the above spreadsheet, I didn't include the months from April 2007 to July 2010 as there was no balance ont the card. But, when reconstructed without ppi, there was a credit balance, so we would earn the interest on that balance for all those months....am I correct? Also, as with other card, if did go back to 1994, there would probably be a much longer period with it being in credit, again increasing that interest, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, I might actually be geting the hang of all this, as just realised something (or totally not getting it, if I am wrong). On the above spreadsheet, I didn't include the months from April 2007 to July 2010 as there was no balance ont the card. But, when reconstructed without ppi, there was a credit balance, so we would earn the interest on that balance for all those months....am I correct? Why not enter them into the spreadsheet and see what effect it has? Also, as with other card, if did go back to 1994, there would probably be a much longer period with it being in credit, again increasing that interest, right? See what the spreadsheet says when you have your data

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologise twice for this post, firstly am sure everyone is getting sick of me, secondly I know it is not the right forum, but hoping someone can point me in the right direction.

 

Looking at the above spreadsheet, I suddenly noticed my balances (before taking off PPI) were lower that the ones on my statements, and couldn't figure out why, as I had input payments and credits from statements exactly. Then traced it back to Mar 2011, and noticed the issue. We had purchased something, then returned it, and the card was credited, so when I did my figure for credit that month, added the amount credited with the payment made. However, the closing balance on that statement, and all up to todays, are the exact amount credited more than my balance. So it would appear that even though it is on the statement, BC never actually readjusted the balance to reflect the credit. Has anyone ever seen this happen before? How do I tackle it? Cause, taking ppi payments aside, this means from that statement, every interst amount charged was incorrect?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, SAR Letter before action will be posted recorded delivery tomorrow. Just to follow up on the interest charges, and the difference between the original balance and adjusted balance, I calculated on attached spreadsheet. Not too muach on this card, but on HSBC would be a larger amount.

 

FosRunningPPI%2520v101(1)%20bc3(1).xls

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to follow up on the interest charges, and the difference between the original balance and adjusted balance, I calculated on attached spreadsheet. Not too muach on this card, but on HSBC would be a larger amount.

 

[ATTACH]32719[/ATTACH]

 

Sorry?...what is this about? don't follow

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am at my wits end!!!!!!!!! I just spoke to someone at ico, who said they are only concerned about the 6 year point, and if bc said all they have is the statements, then that is all they are required to send. I asked if I could enforce them to send certificates of destruction, and he said ico not addressing data destruction and would not agree they should have certificates, call fsa. I rang fsa, and they said no one regulates how uk banks should get rid of financial/personal information?????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Candyapple,

 

BC have access to data beyond 6 years as shown by the cases of others. For example :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?286215-Barclays-want-to-start-court-action-help-please!&p=3310150&viewfull=1#post3310150

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?206050-Webby-v-Barclaycard-**WON-with-CCI-and-Older-Charges**

 

If you think there is PPI and/or default charges that you can reclaim going beyond 6 years, you can take further action with BC seeking disclosure of older a/c data.

 

See this Sticky Thread in the BC forum - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?50148-Barclaycard-amp-Microfiche-they-are-wrong-OFFICIAL&p=3403246&viewfull=1#post3403246

 

Both the above threads resulted in older data being supplied by BC, who then went on to repay default charges plus compound interest in restitution.

 

You can use Template Letter 2 from here to demand the older data - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?593-Data-Protection-Act-Non-Compliance-Template-Letters

 

If they fail to comply, use Letter 3 as your LBA. After that, you can file a claim at your local county court seeking nominal compensation (at the court's discretion) and an order for BC to disclose the older a/c data.

 

If you have to file a claim against BC, you will name them as Barclays Bank PLC t/a Barclaycard and use the London HQ address.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick, very useful info, am getting onto it now. I know for sure our claim goes back to feb 1994, even BC have confirmed that is when the policy started, but as can't chase statements back longer than 6 years, don't have the figures.

 

Has anyone dealt directly with Marclay Insurance Dublin? Have tried giving them a call but number does not work, not sure if it is because I am calling from overseas???? Anyone have an international number, or any dealings with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...