Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
    • Thankyou for your reply jk2054 thats put my mind at ease regarding going forward, appreciate your help.   Thanks Bankfodder, I will look over that thread now. In regards to the further info: Item was a jacket, value £995.00 and was declared correctly Item was fully insured to the value and £995.00 declared correctly  Item was sent on 03/02/23 Thanks  
    • Sunak must be using GBNOTnews financial planners .. GB News losses up 38% to £42.4m giving channel total deficit of £76m since launch Losses in the latest accounting period were six times greater than revenue.   Mind you, as it seems to clearly be a disinformation service and route of money to poopy MPs and hangers on ... I'm sure they dont mind (mm is that the 'Tory guv or GBNews I'm talking about?.)   GB News owner pumps in further £41mn in funding as losses widen WWW.FT.COM Vehicle backed by hedge fund tycoon Paul Marshall steps in as right-leaning broadcaster increases number of staff   GB News losses grew 38% to £42.4m in 2023 financial year - Press Gazette PRESSGAZETTE.CO.UK GB News' operating losses grew 38% to £42.4m in the year to May 2023, the business has reported in its latest Companies House...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Question regarding Bailiff Fees


phunkeymonkeh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To cut a long story short, i was £200 in arrears on last years council tax. Judgement was ordered, and i was presented with a bill for the outstanding amount plus this years circa £900.

 

The bailiff company came (Menai Collect) and i paid them in full on their first visit, and i didnt sign anything or let them in.

 

They charged me £85 for removal with a van....

 

Can they do this? i thought they could only apply this charge if a walking possesion had been signed.?

 

I complained to the Bailiff compant requesting the £85 back, and they have just sent me a letter saying that they can charge this fee at any stage and do not require me to have previously signed a walking posession.

 

I want to double check before i write to them again.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're pulling your leg, phunkey.

There is no point in them attending with a van to remove goods if they have not previously entered your house to levy.

Presumably there were other charges beside the £85 van fee. They might have overcharged you for those as well!

Write to them asking for a full statement of their costs.

Write to your council complaining about the charges imposed by their bailiff.

Make sure each letter is accompanied by a copy of the other.

Post back here when you get a response.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elsinore,

 

There were no other charges. That was their first visit.

 

I have already written to them and the council.

I havnt received a response from the council yet, but Menai Collect wrote back stating that and i quote

 

'the regulations do not state that this fee can only be charged if a walking possesion agreement has been entered into. '

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to ask their managing director, Mike Garland, if he thinks this squares with the 'mission statement' on his website:-

 

"Menai’s focus is to obtain the best outcomes for its clients’ while maintaining the highest possible standards of professionalism; upholding the dignity of the laws under which it operates and promoting respect in equal measure for the law and for those against whom it enforces the law"

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, this letter was from Mike Garland.

 

The bailiff that called at my house was the other director ! Such a professional outfit.

 

Esentially what im asking , is the charge legal at that stage....first visit and no entry or walking possesion.

 

If not, do you have any links or exerts i can fire back at him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is not legal to charge a van fee for collection of council tax if the bailiff has not taken a levy. The fees for council tax are regulated by statute - if no levy has been taken then they are allowed to charge £22.50 for the first letter or visit and £16.50 for the second. That is it unless they obtain walking possession - if you would like a summary of what they can charge go to national debtline's web site: National Debtline, for FREE CONFIDENTIAL and INDEPENDENT ADVICE call 0808 808 4000, and go to factsheets, then bailiffs and council tax, where the regulations have been reproduced. They do this all the time - don't let them get away with it. If they refuse to refund you, national debtline's factsheet tells you how and where to complain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wont go into the details because it enrages me.

But to give you the full picture i met them on the doorstep as i was leaving. I refused to sign anything or let them in.

 

The bailiff removed, without my persmission..my car keys from my back pocket and wouldnt give them back.

 

Does this change anything at all, can they 'levy' without me signing anything ?

I should mention that their van, was not a van at all , but a mitsibushi truck

Link to post
Share on other sites

That does cloud the issue a little - did they remove your car? What happened to the keys? Basically I think they can sieze a vehicle if they have reason to believe it is yours (and the bill is in your name) but if they want to have the right to come back another time to remove goods then you have to sign a walking possession agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff charges for Council Tax from October 2003

 

For a visit to your home where no entry is made and a list of goods is not made (i.e. a levy is not made)

a) £22.50 for a first visit

b) £16.50 for a second visit

c) no further charges for further visits

 

For one attendance with a vehicle with a view to recover goods after the levy has been made under this heading -

 

Reasonable costs incurred (N.B. only one charge can be made).

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't pick pocket you - although having watched the Whistleblower programme on bailiffs this week - they seem to get away with all sorts of things they can't legally do - and if it is your word against theirs it seems they get away with it with impunity. Outrageous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

>Funnily, the letter i received from the bailiffs regarding my complaint confirms that they took the keys from my pocket.

 

Is it worded like they pick pocketed you? I would be going straight to the police with that evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...