Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A letter of claim can't be served by email as per CPR 6.3 unless you've specifically told them. Also can't give you 7 days to pay, they've got to give at least 14 days. They know this, they're just hoping you wet yourself and cough up. This won't be going anywhere. IGNORE.
    • Good Morning, I received a speeding ticket last December, I had requested further information from the ticket office which they provided, I also sent back the form confirming i was the diver at the time, however, i had overlooked the signature at the bottom of the page, nobody from the ticket office got back in touch to mention this and i was trying to book a course with no luck, I got in touch with them and sent them a screenshot showing them I was unable to book the course, they came came back to me and said we have no documents to say you were the driver (they did they just failed to mention I never signed it) they re sent the form and it was over the 120 days, i had mentioned to them previously that the timeframe was coming up and they would need to extend this. They are now saying they have complied legally and i need to accept the 3 points, I am trying to plead my case and I am tempted to let this go to court and provide the evidence of my constant communication on the matter. has anyone got any experience with this? TIA.
    • Thank you. I'm looking into it at the moment.  Straight away it says last sold in 2007. Thank you every one for all your help. It's much appreciated. 
    • Just on bankfodder's final point above. The Title Register you get online for £3 can't legally be used as proof of ownership for the property. Right now they'll suffice to see if there's an asset there. Should you need to use it in court to say he's trading at that address, you'll need to fill out an OC1 form with HM Land Registry to get an official copy in the post, which costs £7.00. Make sure that you get the Title Register, not the Title Plan! Title Register will tell you who owns the property etc while the Title Plan will tell you the property boundaries etc which isn't relevant in this case.  
    • Received this via email today once again wanting payment within 7 days of the email but the mail is dated from WEEKS ago…   what’s the play after this one? Still ignore?   S6 email .pdf S6 email 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bring it on!!! Whits vs. Barclays Bank


Whits
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

lol - Barclays just drag it out as long as possible!

 

Ain't that the truth :rolleyes:

 

It just feels like I should charge them for all the time I've spent pursuing them, I think I'll charge them £50 per hour :D

Whits vs. Barclays thieving Bank:-

 

Barclays agree to pay me - £2972.12!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

some facts and figures from my scrambled head.

if barclays has 1 million customers and 1% are claiming charges back that = 10,000 people.

lets say 50% drop out or are scared off =5,000 people each claiming on average £2000 .

i make that £10 million.

lets say barclays make £500 million a year profit.

no wonder they drag it out so long , they would do it if they could save 10 pence , talk about pigs and troughs.

that's my rant over lol.

good luck mate.(did you get the joke about my scrambled head and my user name).:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I got a letter this morning from the court informing me that my preliminary allocation hearing has been set for 18th June :eek:

 

I just wanted to check if this is the hearing date that you need before ringing Barclays to offer them the chance to settle :confused:

 

TIA

Whits vs. Barclays thieving Bank:-

 

Barclays agree to pay me - £2972.12!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays are really pi**ing me off now :mad:

 

I rang them before I went to file my AQ as I was really struggling to get the money together to pay the court fees. The guy I spoke to on the phone said, "You know and I know that we will settle but not until you have a court date."

 

So, I phoned them this morning as I have a court date for 18th June and this bloke tells me that they won't consider settling until 2 weeks before that court date :mad:

 

I've just complained to the financial ombudsman about this so I'm waiting for a response. I put on my claim form that I'm certain no bank has ever won one of these cases so why can't they just admit they are wrong?

 

Sorry for ranting, but I'm claiming nearly £3000 and I want it now.

 

 

 

And breathe :grin:

Whits vs. Barclays thieving Bank:-

 

Barclays agree to pay me - £2972.12!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

WOO-HOO!!!!!!

 

They've finally gone and settled, I'm so flipping happy!!!!!!

 

I sent an email to Krysta Campbell last week and she sent a settlement offer to the wrong address so I didn't get it. Sent her another email this evening and asked her if she would fax it to me and she replied. I wasn't expecting her to be working after 6 but after a bit of friendly banter, she finally conceded and has agreed to pay me just short of £3000 :D :D :D

 

Now I just have to wait for it to appear in my bank and Whits is a happy bunny!! :D :D :D

Whits vs. Barclays thieving Bank:-

 

Barclays agree to pay me - £2972.12!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...