Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RLP ISSUE (thread starter for Moonmoon6655)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am starting this thread for the above named individual as he is having problems negotiating the site.

Please respond as if you were directing answers to him. This is his post.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Hi

I am sorry if my English no good but i try to my best to explain my sister did swap the price want to get cheaper at Denbenham store she was on CCTV last thursday and staff took her to room then police recorded her details and said if she do again you arrested and gave her Form IM 3 and IM 3A mean Immigration 1971 section 6(2) and security CCTV staff gave her a paper RLPlink3.gif. she been very upset what she did she knows she made a big stupid thing she is 38 non british national but she married with british man currently she hold spouse visa. So Does she deportation?? she very scared to deportation. what RLPlink3.gif mean she still dont get letter

from RLP or police then what happends next? please give me advice and answer please.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Got your PM

I think you should read both of these.

http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/IDIs/idischapter13/section1/section1?view=Binary

 

http://www.kent.police.uk/about_us/policies/n/n016a.html

 

They give reasonable (although confusing) information about the potential of deportation.

 

Did your sister receive a caution?

 

Don't worry about RLP for now. I will ask around to see if anyone can offer some advice

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please keep your query to one thread. Posting your question all over the forum won't get you the answers you need any sooner

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

please reply/use this thread with regard these RLP & any other questions you have.

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am reposting your PM here to get other views.

 

Form IM 3A NOTICE TO BE SERVED UNDER SECTION6(2) OF THE IMMIGRATION ACT 1971

TO.. my sister's name............Mrs.....

You have been (found to have committed an offence which carries with it,in addition to any sentence which the court may think proper,the possibility of a recommendation that you should be deported under the immigration act 1971. The notice attached sets out the grounds on which you may claim to be exempt from liability to deportation; for example,because you are a British citizen; or you are a commonwealth citizen and one of your parents was born here; or because you were resident here on....................... .........and have had your home here for at least 5 years(excluding any period of 6 months or more spent in prison).

A current passort will usually indicate if the holder is a british citizen and not therefore liable to deportation; and a commonwealth citizen may hold a certificate of entitlement in proof that he has the right of abode is not therefore liable to deportation.

You should study the notice carefully. If you think that any of the grounds for exemption applies to you,it will be up to u to prove it at the proper time, if the need arises.Meanwhile,you are asked to show that you have received the notice by signing the form of receipt below.

(The above is not part of the notice and should not be regarded as a statement of the law.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION6(20 OF THE IMMIGRATION ACT 1971

 

I have been served in pursuance of section6(2) of the Immigration Act 1971 with a notice describing the classes of person in respect of whom a recommendation for deportation may,and may not, be made and containing a statement to effect of section 3(8) of that Act.

 

(Signed)..........she signed her name there....Mrs...

Date.... 13/10/2011

 

The security Denbemham gave her a paper of RLP.

and the police recorded her details Grounds detained by loss prevention for price swapping on items of fragrance and then gave her Form IM 3 and IM 3A.

 

she came uk as visitor for 6 months in 2008 and another continued then 2009 she married with a british man and now hold 2 years of spouse visa uk. she is Thai nationality.. she never do anything unlawful while she been in uk just this case first time. The police said if she do it again arrest her just word police warning.

 

So what do u think about the Form above and what should she do before late? she only was consulting me but husband still dont know. she was scared.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now, I am only guessing here but it looks to me as if your sister received a warning for the price swap and the police are saying that if she does it again, they 'might' report her for deportation. Until something happens, she won't know.

 

With regards to RLP. They will be writing to her so I think it would be in her interest to tell her husband.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

answer post 9!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please look back at post 8 and post 9. In post 8 I gave my opinion and post 9 asks you for more details. Until this happens nothing more can be offered

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

She notyet receive the letter from RLP but you said dont worry about RLP but main stressful to her is The Form IM 3A. mention to your question Did your sister receive a caution? just a police lady said if she does it again the police arrested her i dont understand why she gave her that Form that Form mean terrible to me just she non british citizen it was really unfair she has never been detained or arrested before.

any advice welcome ..Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

RLP (Retail Loss Prevention) will probably send her an invoice which is why i posted your thread in this forum so when that happens the people on this forum can help.

 

As I mentioned earlier, it looks (to me) as if they have given her a warning/caution and it is highly possible that they issue the IM3 automatically when someone on a visa commits an offence.

 

To be absolutely sure what is going on, why not go with her to the police station and ask them. They will know

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some thoughts below (in red)

 

Can i call to ask instead go to the police station???

 

If you want to. On the paperwork she received their should be the name of the police officer who attended. If so, you can phone up the headquarters of the polie and ask which station he/she works out of and make an appointment to go and see the officer.

 

Your answer make my sister a little bit feel better..one question should she write the letter to Denbemhams store to apologise what she did. ?

 

She could do but to be honest, I don't think it would make much difference. It is likely that she is banned from entering Debenhams again anyway

Thank you

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have question

 

1. Did her case call criminal

2. The police report her case to Home office UK Border(Immigration)

3. Do her name in the data for report at the police station

4. She holding 2 years spouse visa Valid from 21/10/09 Valid until 21/01/12 so it is effect when she apply to british citizen or another visa

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...