Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
    • DX, worth mentioning? I take it that you refer to after ,65 loan is written off clause. I thought that after the problems I had at deferment (/no proof of income satisfied them, and I could not afford an accountant) after they stopped pestering that they had decided that the age related clause  had kicked in. As I said, its time to hit back with SB letter.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How do I prove this Sex Discrimination?


mumstaxi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4637 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I made an appointment with a tradesman who refused to come and see me when he found out that my husband wouldn't be there. He says it's company policy to see all partners together... He then re-phrased this to "all decision makers". I'm OUTRAGED and HUMILIATED. Do I have a case for complaint and how do I prove it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

mumstaxi welcome to The Consumer Action Group community.

 

You haven't received any replies to your problem yet so you might be better off posting your story again directly in the sub-forum which deals with your kind of situation. You will get lots of support there.

 

Also, spend some time looking round the forum. Once you understand the layout, you will be able to get best use from this Consumer Community. It is a big forumm and may take some time. But it will be worth doing.

Good luck.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'm not sure if it's discrimination or not. Are you thinking of buying something that needs you both to sign? In the past, this has happened to us a couple of times. I don't know how they stand legally, but there may be a reason.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know someone who worked making door to door appointments for a company that had this policy.

 

You buy one gnome... You get one gnome free.

 

When the sales rep gets to the house he will ask if the home owner is there. If there is two they both have to be there. Not due to any matter of law but due to as soon as the sales rep steps inside the house that is the moment that the door to door appointment maker will be paid (regardless of whether the sales rep makes a sale).

 

Then it is just to avoid someone getting the free quote and then saying "I'll discuss it with my wife" or one of the two signing to pay and the other cancelling it at a later date.

 

I'm almost certain when they apply this policy they would apply it equally to both men and women (in that they wouldn't allow your husband to agree to buy it without you been present too). Also if it was a same sex couple wanting to buy gnomes for the back garden, therefore getting their front gnomes free, they will still require the other partner to be present.

 

So it is not an issue of what sex you are.

 

and those gnomes are twice as expensive as everywhere else. You really do not get any gnomes free. Take it from me ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Consumer Issues Forum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

no case.....

 

Going into someones house, you dont know their mental state. you dont know what they may accuse the other of doing.

 

I work for a gas company and regulary we would get women asking for women only engineer,

when i worked for a taxi company, again women wouldve asked for women only drivers.... is this discrimination???

I know one driver got freaked out that baly he bought a hackney at great expense, all because one day a women got in the car, rubbed her hands over his head/face touched her breast and claimed if she ddnt get a free fare she would report for sexual assualt.

 

Cery touchy subject, possibly something like this has happeed with the tradesman before therefore he will only enter when both 'partners' are there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the word 'partner' commonly used to denote husband or wife as well as same sex partner?

Not where I live, though it is used to denote fellow lawyers or accountants in a partnership.

 

In a domestic setting, surely it denotes a civil partnership and, as those are not available to heterosexual couples, for you to be in a civil partnership, you'd need to be either bisexual or a ?.

 

A male acquaintance underwent gender reassignment surgery to make him resemble a woman so that he could become a civil partner to his girlfriend. :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not where I live, though it is used to denote fellow lawyers or accountants in a partnership.

 

In a domestic setting, surely it denotes a civil partnership and, as those are not available to heterosexual couples, for you to be in a civil partnership, you'd need to be either bisexual or a ?.

 

A male acquaintance underwent gender reassignment surgery to make him resemble a woman so that he could become a civil partner to his girlfriend. :madgrin:

 

Hello everyone. I have to say this seems a crazy argument to me. Mr_zero, are you in the UK? And has a post that you put here yesterday disappeared?

 

I was under the impression that 'partner' was used so as not to assume that people living together were married, which could be seen as preducial by some.

 

Could I point out that the OP doesn't mention 'partner', just decision maker which is genderless AFAIAA.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...