Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi  Any free apps to download to pdf from android  H
    • Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
    • Probably about 7 days or so. Do you have her email address?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Picture Loans / Idem Servicing


Gram1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What the O.P should do in their situation is write,write,and write again,do not phone,you get a different person on the phone each time you ring,they are programmed with both a nasty and unhelpful attitude and all they will do is ask for money you dont have and of course if you dont make a card payment over the phone they start threatening repo,happens every time,leave a paper trail that you can use later,something that you can put in front of a judge if worse comes to the worst,what he needs is to build a file of hard black and white evidence,paperwork that no one can refute or dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The O.P must build a file with every scrap of info concerning the loan they have because if things do go bad and they have to go to court,its not easy to get a win against these people for sure.In fact you could be mistaken for thinking that the legal and financial sectors walk hand in hand,its almost as if they work as a team,heres an example.The home loans corporation(now known as Paragon took Nash to court in 2001 with a view to repossession,the nash,s were behind with their payments to the tune of 2.5k,the bank base was something like 6% paragon were charging 14%,the Nash,s argued that this was exorbitant and unfair,which most people would argue was correct,however judge dyson found for Paragon arguing that it was right and proper,and that Paragon were not being unfair in charging their customer a full 8 points above the base rate of intrest,that result to me was a licence to print money for Paragon so when i read some of the threads where people are considering court action i would ask that every t is crossed and i dotted,that is why people need facts figures and paperwork,phone calls can always be denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paragon v Pender 2003 appeal gave Paragon the right to repo even though they had sold on the loan to another company,however because they still retained the legal intrest in the loan pulled the roof from over their heads,thus re-packaging loans and selling them to other investors does not mean they give up the right to take away peoples homes,somehow the financial sector has been allowed to seperate the legal from the equitable and get away with it,and who helped them,the legal profession,you just couldnt make it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct Wrigley however the point im making here is that there was no evidence to suggest that Paragon had held intrest rates unreasonably high in order that borrowers would redeem,now,bringing things back into the real world there is no evidence that Idem would fleece a borrower by continually bringing them into default of their obligation,ie the loan but thats what they are doing,this reinforces my point about always,always deal by letter or email as long as you save the corespondence to a personal file

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Idem have been splashing out.They have just purchased 43.2 million of unsecured loans from the Bank of Scotland,a bank will only sell off that part of its portfolio which it believes is not profitable,so how can Idem make money out of this? whats the betting they turn some of this unsecured into secured debt through the use of charging orders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, searched online and saw this thread so I thought I'd register and let you know of some problems that have cropped up with Idem Servicing/Picture in the last few days!!

 

I was paying a Picture unsecured loan that was the negative equity from a previous house. I am renting at the mo and have no equity. I agreed a reduced payment in 2007 and have been paying that by direct debit ever since, I don't think the interest is frozen. I found the staff at Picture unhelpful and rude but they have left me alone for some time now.

 

I had the same letter as everyone else has had re the changeover from Picture to Idem Servicing. The letter stated that no contact was needed, nothing would change and the current direct debit I paid would continue as is.

 

The October DD went out, as planned. However, on checking my internet banking two days ago, I found out that Idem had taken out over DOUBLE my November direct debit amount!! Although this had gone through, it had consequently bounced all my other direct debits. LTSB were very helpful and have already returned the full payment that Idem had taken out, refunded in advance the bank charges (five DD's @ £10 each) and credited me £10 for the hassle.

 

When I called Idem to see what the 'f' wording hell they were playing at, the operator put me on hold for over 7mins and came back with "I don't know what's happened, must be human error, it's our fault, sorry". When I asked for an assurance that this wouldn't happen again, he couldn't give me that. He instead advised me to cancel the direct debit and set up a standing order instead. This is the first time I've ever heard a company NOT prefer a direct debit!! The guy I spoke to yesterday at Idem was helpful and apologetic, but, I've had to ring therm again today and although I eventually got through to the same guy again (still apologising), the first guy I spoke to today was, well, you could just tell, highly trained to be antagonistic and bullying if at all possible!!

 

I hope there isn't some dark secret to all this, good luck to all!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess that Idem will no doubt leave you be. Only problem, and it is a big one, that interest will be mounting to high levels. Ask them for the figure, and maybe even negotiate a reduction or freeze.

 

Newstarter should be able to assist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrigley is correct,you must get to grips with this,sooner rather than later,not only will the intrest be mounting up big time but there may also be monthly arrears charges being added that you know nothing of.Believe me its not unheard of for lenders to come back to the borrower demanding thousands not hundreds so first thing you need to do is write asking for a statement of account,and sharpish.Dont worry lenders of this nature are quite happy to sit back and let intrest and charges mount up,if it were me i would have aletter in the post no later than Monday morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...