Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Toothless Ombudsman and Ignorant Barclays - makes you cry!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been in dispute with Barclays over their (re)definition of BBBR and BOER for many months. I have spent many hours amassing a set of documention around an inch thick and provided internet links and even a video of their own advert proving my case.

 

The Ombudsman is about to rule against me but each point he made and dismissed are not what I asked to be considered. So I asked the Case Review Adjudicator if I could see exactly what questions the Ombudsman had asked of Barclays and what Barclays replies were.

 

Here is the response in full (is it Chinese Whispers or Three Monkeys - you really couldn't make it up):

 

 

Dear Mr Hewitt

 

 

 

Thank you for your e-mail, which has been added to your file. I have attached a copy of the questions that Barclays has been asked during our investigation together with its responses.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barry XXX

 

Case Review Adjudicator

 

 

 

·Mr Hewitt has supplied a number of website links relating to the information Barclays was giving about its base rate (BBBR) around 2007. I understand that you have already received these in an email from Mr Hewitt when he originally brought this complaint. I am also attaching a further link which he has recently sent to us relating to the advertising of the rate. The ombudsman has asked for Barclays' comments on its advertising of the rate

{Link to moneysavingexpert.com removed to allow post}

The attached website has no affiliation to Barclays, therefore, I do not think it is appropriate to comment.

 

·I am also attaching a link to a Barclays advert which aired in 2007 which appears to show that it was marketing its rate as tracking the BoE base rate. Please can I have your comments on this {Link to tellyads.com removed to allow post}

Again, this website has no affiliation to Barclays and therefore I do not think it is appropriate for me to comment.

 

·Does Barclays accept that in 2007 it said its rate was the same as BoE base rate and did it market its products a tracking BoE, rather than its own rate? When did it stop doing this?

 

As stated in my e-mail dated 6 April to Mr XXX, Barclays Bank Base Rate (BBBR) has tracked the Bank of England Base Rate (BofEBR) since the start of the 20th Century and there has not, to ourknowledge, been an exception to this.

 

·Was it likely that in 2006 Barclays staff would have told enquiring customers that its tracker mortgage tracked BoE rate?

 

Our staff would have informed any customer making an enquiry that a Barclays Tracker Mortgage tracked BBBR, which would be disclosed in the Key Facts Illustration and the Mortgage Offer.

 

·Please can Barclays also provide a complete copy of the September 2001 edition of the terms and conditions of the mortgage.

 

Unfortunately,we do not have any additional information to the 2001 Mortgage Terms andConditions. However, as I have said previously, the Conditions applicable to Mr Hewitt and Ms Storm’s Mortgage is attached to their Mortgage Offer, which was attached to my e-mail of 6 April. Condition 7 states:The interest rate charged shall always be 0.75% above the Barclays Bank Base Rate.

 

While I appreciate Mr Hewitt & Ms Storm’s concerns, the interest of their Tracker Mortgage has been charged at BBBR,which is the same as the BofEBR. BBBR is a rate set by Barclays Bank PLC, which typically follows the BofEBR but it is not guaranteed to do so. I do not see the relevance of Mr Hewitt & Ms Storm’s concerns in this respect because the interest rate of their Mortgage has moved in line with each change to the BofEBR. The fact the Bank uses its own rate (BBBR) is for commercial purposes, in view of any unforeseen eventuality that may occur within the property market.

 

 

 

 

I'm going to look around this site to see if anyone has posted links to Mortgage Conditions/KFI/Supplementary Conditions for 2006 (and 2001 if possible). I have seen snippets of these on various websites but need to get a copy of the full versions. If anyone can direct me I would be most grateful. If you have copies and are prepared to upload them (redacting any personal info of course) that would be even better and I can pay a little (say £20) for your trouble.

 

Cheers

Simon

Edited by simmotech
Link to post
Share on other sites

·I am also attaching a link to a Barclays advert which aired in 2007 which appears to show that it was marketing its rate as tracking the BoE base rate. Please can I have your comments on this {Link to tellyads.com removed to allow post}

Again, this website has no affiliation to Barclays and therefore I do not think it is appropriate for me to comment.

 

Hello simmotech

 

In the advert is something that is said or shown on screen ?

 

If it is something that is said, couldn't you record the audio onto a cd and send it to the Ombudsman Service to pass onto Barclays.

 

If it is something on screen, couldn't you get a screen shot (play the video press print screen and paste into word other software package) and send a copy of it to the Ombudsman Service to pass onto Barclays.

 

Just thinking of a way to get other come the petty objections of Barclays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...